04-01-2014, 06:58 PM
Tracy Riddle Wrote:But Jim, why do you think Shaw put himself out there trying to get Oswald a lawyer, rather than cutting him loose? If he had kept quiet, he might never have been put on trial.
This might tell you Shaw was deep CIA enough to feel he had the latitude to risk bailing out a fellow operative. It could tell you Shaw saw Oswald's capture as a mistake and was laying the ground work for his legal exoneration. Or it could tell you Shaw was conscious enough of Oswald's being witnessed as being associated with some New Orleans intel heavyweights that he saw it in his own self-interest to defend and free Oswald. It could tell you Shaw was confident enough in the deep-layered corruption surrounding the event that he might actually be able to pull it off. Or he might be able to pull off burying Oswald by introducing a corruptable lawyer as a pseudo defendant. Shaw's actions could be seen as that of a desperate man conscious of the broad witnessing of himself, Oswald, and Ferrie in Clinton and New Orleans. Shaw was prone to such incautious behavior as his slipping with his alias showed.
Shaw had deep connections as any Gladio/Permindex member would. Far beyond any remote compartmentalization as a minor New Orleans operative. This is why the media is forced to ignore Destiny Betrayed because it pretty much proves the conspiracy.