15-01-2014, 07:36 PM
Nick - you are of course entitled to whatever you'd like to think...
I've done enough photoshop work to know that the backgrounds of these two images are NOT the same and were NOT taken from the same distance.. It has nothing to do with APPARENTLY Nick...
If the background was the same we'd be able to superimpose it and it would match... it does not.
Oswald was NOT shown 133-C... sorry. The "premature" refers to your using 133-C with regards to ANY witness or ANY relationship to other photos from that day... any time prior to the HSCA
What I am saying is that in Fritz's report HE REMEMBERS the conversation as happening around 12:35 on 11/23 while the photos do not arrive at the DPD until later in the day...
He is SHOWN the photos at 6pm... when he says all these things - supposedly. The CSS form showns only NEGATIVES while Stovall claims the found photos are listed on the inventory as "misc photos"... there is a listing from Irving that shows "misc phots" if you believe that they would seperate the photos and negatives and not specify the BYP photos specifically...
The PHOTOS are printed at the DPD... need I say more as to why one of the negatives disappears?
Now Nick... it is GREAT to speculate when trying to prove a theory... yet there is no evidence I have seen that brings 133-C to light before the early 70's OTHER than the suspicious posing of the DPD and the ghost cutout matching THAT pose.
STOVALL and WHITE each have a copy of 133-C....
Cool?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]5677[/ATTACH]
I've done enough photoshop work to know that the backgrounds of these two images are NOT the same and were NOT taken from the same distance.. It has nothing to do with APPARENTLY Nick...
If the background was the same we'd be able to superimpose it and it would match... it does not.
Oswald was NOT shown 133-C... sorry. The "premature" refers to your using 133-C with regards to ANY witness or ANY relationship to other photos from that day... any time prior to the HSCA
What I am saying is that in Fritz's report HE REMEMBERS the conversation as happening around 12:35 on 11/23 while the photos do not arrive at the DPD until later in the day...
He is SHOWN the photos at 6pm... when he says all these things - supposedly. The CSS form showns only NEGATIVES while Stovall claims the found photos are listed on the inventory as "misc photos"... there is a listing from Irving that shows "misc phots" if you believe that they would seperate the photos and negatives and not specify the BYP photos specifically...
The PHOTOS are printed at the DPD... need I say more as to why one of the negatives disappears?
Now Nick... it is GREAT to speculate when trying to prove a theory... yet there is no evidence I have seen that brings 133-C to light before the early 70's OTHER than the suspicious posing of the DPD and the ghost cutout matching THAT pose.
STOVALL and WHITE each have a copy of 133-C....
Cool?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]5677[/ATTACH]
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter