24-02-2014, 10:57 PM
With so many "disinfo" specialists on the job, I look at them all as the glaring example of the conspiracy. They make it all so real.
As for the 1963 cover up, I think in 1963 that the culture of belief in government made the conspiracy cover up so much more plausible and believable than today. The enormous flow of information in society today makes the conspiracy cover up look almost asinine. It is as obvious as a road runner cartoon. Much like finding The Three Stooges hilarious and kids today finding them boring. The stooges of the cover up are so plain to see now as technology exposes the travesty of the cover up. It's like trying to take Gary Mack and McAdams serious when they litter their work with rude innuendo and half truths.
As for the 1963 cover up, I think in 1963 that the culture of belief in government made the conspiracy cover up so much more plausible and believable than today. The enormous flow of information in society today makes the conspiracy cover up look almost asinine. It is as obvious as a road runner cartoon. Much like finding The Three Stooges hilarious and kids today finding them boring. The stooges of the cover up are so plain to see now as technology exposes the travesty of the cover up. It's like trying to take Gary Mack and McAdams serious when they litter their work with rude innuendo and half truths.
Albert Doyle Wrote:That's what gets to me about this whole thing Anthony, is the plain friggin obviousness of the full-blown, right out there in the open corruption of this whole damned thing. All due to the sick premise of covert CIA national security during the Cold War. Forgive me for being vulgar but sometimes I'd love to push Von Pein's face into it and rub his face in it - personally -.