Oswald's height as given in PS 44 records

[Bob Prudhomme]

[quote=David Josephs]Is this man for real anymore? Having known Greg in the past I am now alarmed that someone else, who is NOT Greg Parker, is now posting in his place.... Even he is not known for mistakes of this level...

Someone ought to warn him about this... I suggest we put a hold on anymore posting from whoever it is that claims to be Greg until he is made aware of this...


[ATTACH=CONFIG]5834[/ATTACH]

Where did you obtain


[ATTACH=CONFIG]5833[/ATTACH][/QUOTE


Where did you obtain this, David?

Here is what MFF has
http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archiv...elPageId=8

So according to you, he shrank from 67[SUP]1/2" to 64"?
[/SUP]
For the record, I think the first figure is either 51 [SUP]1/2" [/SUP]or 53[SUP]1/2[/SUP]"

So, you're saying he grew 10.5-12.5" in 4 months? What was she feeding that kid?

I have been assured that people here are intelligent.

51 [SUP]1/2" [/SUP]or 53[SUP]1/2 to 54" [/SUP]is a growth of 1/2" to 2[SUP]1/2[/SUP]" when I went to school. Obviously the lower amount is the most probable.

Are you not curious about David's document which indicates he actually shrunk?

You know, I swore I wasn't going to answer another one of your moronic posts but, you, my friend, are literally begging for a good ass kicking. I'll bet you had your ass kicked on a regular basis in school, didn't you.

Okay, for starters, I don't care what backward part of this planet you come from, that number on the right is unquestionably a "64". If you think otherwise, you are likely on some serious drugs and should seek counselling for your addiction. The other number is possibly up for debate but, to my eyes, it appears it would be "67.25".

Yes, this would mean that he shrunk 2.75 inches in four months but, have you never heard of someone making a typographical error? A typo is far more likely than your explanation which would, as I stated, have the child growing 10.5-12.5 inches in four months.