30-03-2014, 01:07 AM
Greg R Parker Wrote:The copy at MFF cannot possibly be read as "64". That you say that the copy used is simply missing part of the "6" makes it an awfully convenient flaw in the copy.
Look at the MFF copy. It is full of misprinted voids throughout. Then look at David's copy, there are no such voids. The simple explanation is that the "6" in the MFF version has a random misprint void you are not comprehending. It's a 64 Greg, as David's copy shows.
Quote:Your insistence that there is nothing wrong with David's copy is noted. Can you explain how you know that as a fact?
Compare them yourself. Especially up by the upper right corner where it says "HEALTH CARD".
Quote:And you are yet to address how Oswald could have been in the top 3% tallest 12 year old boys in the US. Do you really, honestly believe he was?
Could it be Armstrong was correct?