Oswald's height as given in PS 44 records

[Don Jeffries]

Tonsils growing back is the exception.

Actually I have provided proof that tonsils taken from a 5 year old in 1945 would almost certainly grow back. NOT growing back would be the exception.

In sum, it is because back then, only a portion of the tonsils were removed - and they are still in a growth start until year 8.

Again - your exception is no exception at all. Smoke and mirrors prop this theory up.

You just will not admit you're ever wrong, and yet you insist that this is a trait of those who disagree with you. Classic projection. Here are a few links that will assure any unbiased person that tonsils growing back most definitely is the exception, as Albert stated.

http://doctorstevenpark.com/can-tonsils-...-removal-2
http://ent.about.com/od/entdisorderssu/f...ectomy.htm
http://kidshealth.org/parent/question/ge...again.html
http://www.australiandoctor.com.au/clini...grow-back-

I could have provided a lot more links, from doctors and nurses, testifying to the rarity of tonsils growing back, which when it occurs is a partial regrowth. What "proof" have you "provided" that tonsils taken from a 5 year old in 1945 "would almost certainly grow back?"

It really is ridiculous that we are arguing over whether tonsils can grow back, on a JFK assassination forum. But your refusal to admit you're wrong about something even as insignificant as this says a lot about your personality.

You accuse others of overlooking evidence and logic because of their blind adherence to Armstrong's theory. Here you are, completely misrepresenting minutiae like this, because of your adamant opposition to it.