Oswald's height as given in PS 44 records

[Albert Doyle]

Marguerite not understanding what's involved in a tonsillectomy would be an exception?

It's unlikely an osteopath would not explain to Marguerite that it was a non-surgical procedure that wasn't a tonsillectomy per say. Most mothers would want to know what exactly was being done to their child and most osteopaths would be glad to explain it. Most children would remember a tonsillectomy so it would then be likely the Marine Oswald would communicate to the doctors that he had already had his tonsils removed. Doctors are sticklers for medical statistics so they would be likely to record regrown tonsils.

As for the form -- your way of looking at is the exact opposite of mine. You say the form must be correct - after commenting about how many times these forms AREN'T correct - and want to miss connecting 50,000 dots and go straight from a 53 school report to false Oswald sightings 10 years later.

I think a forgery would be visible on the original if put to high tech testing. You are then left with a nurse who did this regularly making a 10 inch mistake. Are there any photos of Oswald standing from this time period that could be compared?

My way of looking at it is, if all the evidence suggests Oswald was not 5' 4" in 1953 EXCEPT this form - them the form HAS to be wrong. How it came to be wrong is a separate matter.

If you look closely you have just made the same argument as Armstrong. Maybe it was just the kid they swapped in that day? All I'm saying is it was definitely a 64.