14-09-2014, 08:14 PM
Drew,
If you will revisit some of the info I have posted about the limo slowing down before the extant 313 headshot, you will find you are right where you need to be with your pixel analysis.
Remember, Paul Mandel in his Life Magazine article (Dec 6,1963) stated there was 74 frames between the 1st and 2nd shots.
Robert West who did the corrected survey for Life Magazine on Nov25,1963 plotted the first shot at what is extant frame 207.
Those two previous actions get us to frame 281.
He also states there is 48 frames between shot 2 and 3. This is where the slowdown occurs with the limo traveling at 3.74 mph, what would cause the limo to slow down abruptly, a shot.
Simmons tells us they are using a 240 slant distance as one of their targets. What's not on film?
If you are not aware of CE884, the last two slant entries are for frame 255-313. Frame 255 is 218 ft and 313 is 265.3ft away.
The slant distance between these two points is 47.3ft. Total frames 58.
Just averaging this out equals 1.22frames per 1 slant ft.
So, 218-240 slant ft = 22 x 1.22frames = 27 frames = 255+27 = Frame282
This is another reason why the last two entries are 58 frames apart. It was much easier to hide the fuzzy math and film alterations with a bigger span of frames to work with and then average things out.
chris
P.S.
Proof of Concept + Film Alteration Proof coming soon.
If you will revisit some of the info I have posted about the limo slowing down before the extant 313 headshot, you will find you are right where you need to be with your pixel analysis.
Remember, Paul Mandel in his Life Magazine article (Dec 6,1963) stated there was 74 frames between the 1st and 2nd shots.
Robert West who did the corrected survey for Life Magazine on Nov25,1963 plotted the first shot at what is extant frame 207.
Those two previous actions get us to frame 281.
He also states there is 48 frames between shot 2 and 3. This is where the slowdown occurs with the limo traveling at 3.74 mph, what would cause the limo to slow down abruptly, a shot.
Simmons tells us they are using a 240 slant distance as one of their targets. What's not on film?
If you are not aware of CE884, the last two slant entries are for frame 255-313. Frame 255 is 218 ft and 313 is 265.3ft away.
The slant distance between these two points is 47.3ft. Total frames 58.
Just averaging this out equals 1.22frames per 1 slant ft.
So, 218-240 slant ft = 22 x 1.22frames = 27 frames = 255+27 = Frame282
This is another reason why the last two entries are 58 frames apart. It was much easier to hide the fuzzy math and film alterations with a bigger span of frames to work with and then average things out.
chris
P.S.
Proof of Concept + Film Alteration Proof coming soon.