Sean Murphy's research deserves more

[Bob Prudhomme]

I'll make it easier for you. Find a witness who even saw him go up the steps. How do you know he didn't go around the corner and up Houston St.?

Don't you see that if that's the investigatory standard you're going to use that it then begs the question where is the witness who said they saw Oswald in the Depository entrance? Some people are the first to complain about proving negatives and then promote a theory based on nothing but that.

I just refuse to believe that Lee Harvey Oswald would be standing right wide out in the open in the Depository entrance during the assassination and nobody would mention it.

This case had total corruption. But the total corruption card can only be used within reasonable limits.

I'm skeptical about Oswald being PM mostly because it shows the plotters having a total lack of control over the patsy. At the very least, Oswald's handler would have told him a story about needing to hang around inside the building at 12:20-30, maybe in the first floor warehouse where there was a phone. Maybe he was told to wait for a call at 12:25 (the motorcade was running late), and by 12:30, he got tired of waiting and went upstairs to the second floor lunchroom. Or something like that. In any case, you can't have Oswald just wandering around outside where he could be photographed by a dozen people.

Or maybe you are assuming the plotters of the assassination had intended for Oswald to be the main patsy. If the original plan had been to foist the blame on Cuba and the USSR, and the "Oswald alone" cover up was hastily thrown together in the immediate aftermath, Oswald might have been a very small part of the original plot, and his actions might never have been noticed if the original plan had stayed together.