14-07-2015, 11:08 PM
As we all know, the selective Service card with photo on it is a forgery.
![[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=7188&stc=1]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=7188&stc=1)
The Warren Commission even provides us a description of the manner of its forgery.
What I'm curious about, is the origin of the photo, which isn't supposed to be there. Has anyone read a article, or have a link to an article, about the provenance of the photo?
It doesn't appear to be one of the photos on "Evolution of Oswald." He looks younger, and he has less receding hair here, than in the other 1963 photos. However, "younger" sort of puts this photo in the Minsk days, or earlier...
The Warren Commission even provides us a description of the manner of its forgery.
What I'm curious about, is the origin of the photo, which isn't supposed to be there. Has anyone read a article, or have a link to an article, about the provenance of the photo?
It doesn't appear to be one of the photos on "Evolution of Oswald." He looks younger, and he has less receding hair here, than in the other 1963 photos. However, "younger" sort of puts this photo in the Minsk days, or earlier...
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."