02-03-2013, 06:59 PM
IS THE MAN WHO KNEW TOO MUCH an underrated book? Should more to be done to promote it?
Hello,one of my very first JFK books ON THE ASSASSINATION that I read was The 2003 edition of The Man Who Knew Too Much.*
The first three pages kind of draw the reader in. eh?*
This book certainly made me curious about a lot of stuff. Do people think it should be more widely known? To me it seems unjust that its sales are so low.
Along similar lines, you know what other marketing reality similarly irks me? THE FACT THAT THERE IS STILL NOW KINDLE EDITION OF Breach of Trust!! Now that book is so important for the 50th because it isolates on the WC alone, and its case rock solid, to some extent, because of this more limited focus. In many ways it is a perfect first book and it is by a historian, which is a good marketing point in a field strewn with so much disinformation.
We should take all actions to demand a kindle edition on Amazon and really let way more people know about this all over the political spectrum.
Hello,one of my very first JFK books ON THE ASSASSINATION that I read was The 2003 edition of The Man Who Knew Too Much.*
The first three pages kind of draw the reader in. eh?*
This book certainly made me curious about a lot of stuff. Do people think it should be more widely known? To me it seems unjust that its sales are so low.
Along similar lines, you know what other marketing reality similarly irks me? THE FACT THAT THERE IS STILL NOW KINDLE EDITION OF Breach of Trust!! Now that book is so important for the 50th because it isolates on the WC alone, and its case rock solid, to some extent, because of this more limited focus. In many ways it is a perfect first book and it is by a historian, which is a good marketing point in a field strewn with so much disinformation.
We should take all actions to demand a kindle edition on Amazon and really let way more people know about this all over the political spectrum.