17-08-2009, 08:27 PM
Charles Drago Wrote:Peter Lemkin Wrote:NB - can anyone in a neutral and sane, intelligent way explain to me why the JFK research community is divided into TWO conferences.....and has been for some time...seems to me we 'ain't gonna win until we re-unite!
...divide and conquer...?
The internecine warfare that for too long has characterized the organized (keep your nasty comments to yourself) JFK research community (see previous parenthetical admonition) is simultaneously a manifestation of base human nature (selfishness, jealousy, tribalism) and the product of "meddling" by the conspirators.
As we know, minority control of the majority exists only to the degree that the former can keep the latter at each others' throats.
So far, so bad -- for us.
About ten years ago I was honored to deliver one of two keynote addresses at a JFK Lancer conference in Dallas (I was scheduled to lead off; David Lifton would follow with the major speech). Earlier in the day, between presentations, George Michael Evica, Ian Griggs, and I sat in the otherwise deserted ballroom and discussed matters grave and not so grave.
Ian spoke of the counter-productivity of two competing JFK conferences running at the same time in the same city. The mood somehow remained light as Ian conjured the image of "John Judge, standing in front of his hotel, handing out pamphlets."
At which point I chimed in, "Yeah ... the Fair Play for COPA Committee."
We all laughed. But not for long.
Cut to the evening's activities. I used the line in my remarks that were focused all but exclusively on just this topic: how and why JFK Lancer and COPA were doing the enemy's work by competing with each other.
After Lifton's inspiring and eloquent speech, Debra Conway took to the podium and, referencing my comment, tearfully reminded everyone how COPA had done Lancer wrong.
Reverse the organizations' names, and you'll have COPA's argument.
Nothing has changed.
I'm not going to the Dallas jamborees this year. And neither should anyone else until the madness stops.
an entire new venue is needed, ala the best of both -- of the non-educating the public variety.... focusing on, "is there enough data/evidence available right now to make a new case for CONSPIRACY..." Add to the mix Retired Superior Court Judge or two, a few retired DA/Prosecutors, few criminal Defense Attorney's, published assassination case related authors (that CITE), a whole slew of case related controversy EXPERT like Witnesses....
...a television production crew -- for the obvious reasons....