15-12-2009, 11:26 PM
John Bevilaqua Wrote:David Guyatt Wrote:John, are you suggesting that Helen Reyes is some sort of psyops operative? Is that the reason you use the unreasonable term RH/NoP PsyOps to describe her?
I feel quite strongly that attacking/misrepresenting other researchers and members of this forum contravenes the forum rules and I wish to direct your attention to the forums decorum and rules of engagement thread HERE, and in particular draw your attention to item 1. (in the event you haven't read them already).
They are strictly adhered to. I assure you.
Let us, therefore, continue this very interesting and intriguing thread without further disruption and/or objectionable terms/descriptions being used henceforward.
David, Lighten up already. Helen and I have been joking and cajoling for days now, even though you have not noticed it, and everything is just perfectly copasetic. She always gets the HR/CryOps (moaning and groaning award) whenever she goes to the "wailing wall" of words as she calls it in order to plow through all the excessive verbiage that I posted there. Sheesh, already. And she used the "unreasonble term" as you call it, HR/NoP herself first and she used it as a joke about herself. NoP stands for Null Operation or Nothing. Your complaint is itself a Null Operation since there is nothing there. Now get a grip and keep posting. And CryOps, my term, just Rhymes with PsyOps. Please no more further artificial disruptions, we were having fun and you are just an interloper and a voyeur on our fun and games. Thank you very much. Are you a Moderator or something? You know once someone actually filed a "sexual harassment charge against me, on behalf of another person" and she just laughed it off and told the investigator, hey I really like the guy, I wish he would make a sexual advance. The 3rd party sexual harassment filer was sent packing to an early retirement after he was told that there is no such thing as a 3rd party sexual harassment charge. And there is no such thing as a 3rd party "objectionable terms/descriptions" charge either. Objectionable is in the eye of the beholder. I even gave her the Jay/Lo booty shake logo and she said smirks were given. Unless Helen files or filed such a charge it is a Null Operation, for God's sake. Get a grip on yourself already. And please cease and desist with these preposterous disruptions to my otherwise excellent and cogent threads. It is quite disruptive and annoying to have some voyeur interloping on inside jokes.
I think that you are actually "attacking/misrepresenting other researchers"
like me, for instance, in this case. Apology accepted if it is ever proffered.
Sheesh.
To quote:
"Let us, therefore, continue this very interesting and intriguing thread without further disruptions, voyeuristic and gratuitous comments and/or unwarranted charges or accusations being made against 3rd parties, or any objectionable terms/descriptions or imagined characterizations being used or applied to researchers henceforward."
You just broke the forum rules by warning/threatening me about allegedly or purportedly breaking these very same forum rules. How ironic. Thank you very much.
John:
Yes, David is a moderator, as is Jan.
Dawn
(I work full time and lately overtime, so just catching up here).