Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mr. Fetzer I have been to your site
#38
Charles Drago Wrote:Gentlemen,

Before you can fill in the blanks, you must have ...

blanks!

I respectfully submit to my good and true friends Jim Fetzer and Mark Stapleton that your respective arguments would be best served were you to share with us your respective organization charts of the conspiracy.

As you may know, I have offered my own version (jointly developed with George Michael Evica) more than once on this website (http://www.deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/....php?t=419) and on at least one other. Feel free to review it and, if you deem it worthy in part or in full, work with its structure.

If you deem it to be unworthy, and/or if you already are confident in your own model(s), then please share your hypotheses with us.

In the spirit of full disclosure, I remain of the informed opinion that the parties each of you identify as bearing culpability in the JFK murder belong on what in the Evica/Drago model is termed the "Facilitator" level of the plot.

Just trying to help, gentlemen. Please carry on.

Charles

Well it seems Mr. Fetzer doesn't want to reply on this thread anymore and I am no wiser about his hypothesis of the who and why, and importantly, its basic structure.

My basic argument that Israel's motive trumps any of the others is contained in post #20, which I have now completed.

Needless to say Charles, I would have Israel as the sponsor in my model.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Mr. Fetzer I have been to your site - by Mark Stapleton - 01-05-2010, 09:42 AM
Mr. Fetzer I have been to your site - by Mark Stapleton - 05-05-2010, 12:36 AM
Mr. Fetzer I have been to your site - by Mark Stapleton - 05-05-2010, 09:31 AM
Mr. Fetzer I have been to your site - by Mark Stapleton - 07-05-2010, 02:30 AM
Mr. Fetzer I have been to your site - by Mark Stapleton - 07-05-2010, 03:38 AM
Mr. Fetzer I have been to your site - by Mark Stapleton - 07-05-2010, 09:55 AM
Mr. Fetzer I have been to your site - by Mark Stapleton - 08-05-2010, 12:53 AM
Mr. Fetzer I have been to your site - by Mark Stapleton - 08-05-2010, 07:17 AM
Mr. Fetzer I have been to your site - by Mark Stapleton - 08-05-2010, 08:50 AM
Mr. Fetzer I have been to your site - by Mark Stapleton - 10-05-2010, 03:43 AM
Mr. Fetzer I have been to your site - by Mark Stapleton - 10-05-2010, 03:00 PM
Mr. Fetzer I have been to your site - by Mark Stapleton - 11-05-2010, 01:24 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  DPF Bans Professor James H. Fetzer: The Rationale The Moderators 69 361,626 04-04-2020, 09:01 AM
Last Post: Mark A. O'Blazney
  The Decline and Fall of Jim Fetzer Jim DiEugenio 132 66,500 18-03-2016, 06:51 PM
Last Post: Richard Coleman
  Is there something wrong with the MFF site? David Josephs 6 4,684 30-10-2015, 06:52 PM
Last Post: David Josephs
  From James Fetzer's Group - for those interested Adele Edisen 5 3,386 08-06-2013, 12:47 AM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  Fetzer gets a listing in Urban Dictionary: 'Fetzering' is a term for talking balls. Seamus Coogan 83 19,228 26-03-2013, 11:24 PM
Last Post: John Mooney
  The Palamara, "Doyle," Fetzer, and Jeffries Dust-Ups: The Simple Reason Why Charles Drago 4 3,790 20-02-2013, 07:15 PM
Last Post: Charles Drago
  Jim Fetzer - The Tehran Tiger -- Strikes Again Charles Drago 1 2,042 19-02-2013, 07:44 PM
Last Post: Jan Klimkowski
  Fetzer Deemed "Not Credible" by Morley and Bradford; Accused of Spreading "Misinformation" and "Disi Charles Drago 33 10,655 05-01-2013, 09:32 PM
Last Post: Charles Drago
  "Cinque," Fetzer, "Doyle" and the Tactics of Subversion Charles Drago 1 3,736 13-12-2012, 01:16 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Fetzer and guilt by association Greg Burnham 10 4,448 13-11-2012, 03:52 PM
Last Post: Charles Drago

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)