20-05-2011, 12:39 PM
Hello Seamus,
I agree with that: Among the elite there is divergent opinion.
But, when the big dog wags his tail the other dogs move back and give him some room.
Who has been the "big dog" in the American political/economic/financial landscape for the last hundred plus years?
That's why I don't think H.L. Hunt or Clint Murchinson (and certainly not LBJ) were big enough dogs to get this done. They hated President Kennedy, but did they have the power to kill him and cover it up and know there would never be any repercussions?
When the "big dog" makes a decision, the rest get in line. What could they do otherwise?
I've recently been reading some of what Lisa Pease has written about the potential involvement of the Howard Hughes machine in the RFK murder. We see Henry Crown's fingerprints all around the JFK assassination. Vasilios compared it to fingers on a glove. More like tentacles on a octopus.
But, what is the face of it? The tentacles have had our attention for the last fifty years.
Could the plot, as we know it, have worked with one conversation between two men?
I think so.
All the layers. All the intricacies. One conversation.
Who has that kind of power?
The list isn't very long. At least as I currently know it.
I agree with that: Among the elite there is divergent opinion.
But, when the big dog wags his tail the other dogs move back and give him some room.
Who has been the "big dog" in the American political/economic/financial landscape for the last hundred plus years?
That's why I don't think H.L. Hunt or Clint Murchinson (and certainly not LBJ) were big enough dogs to get this done. They hated President Kennedy, but did they have the power to kill him and cover it up and know there would never be any repercussions?
When the "big dog" makes a decision, the rest get in line. What could they do otherwise?
I've recently been reading some of what Lisa Pease has written about the potential involvement of the Howard Hughes machine in the RFK murder. We see Henry Crown's fingerprints all around the JFK assassination. Vasilios compared it to fingers on a glove. More like tentacles on a octopus.
But, what is the face of it? The tentacles have had our attention for the last fifty years.
Could the plot, as we know it, have worked with one conversation between two men?
I think so.
All the layers. All the intricacies. One conversation.
Who has that kind of power?
The list isn't very long. At least as I currently know it.