25-05-2011, 07:18 PM
Seamus Coogan Wrote:Hey its all good to have a back and forth Jan. I disagree in many ways but I came across as needlessly heavy handed. Crisman, yes he's an interesting character and I agree theres more to him than meets the eye. The Torbitt document stuff about him is of course dubious. But yeah he is definitely hooked up in disinfo. But theres also a ton of disinfo about Crisman. Hence I tread the path very warily.
Seamus - Pax!
I'm a fan of robust exchanges too. In fact, they are part of the core rationale for DPF.
No one researcher knows everything, and philosophically I believe that working hypotheses benefit from being exposed to new evidence and new interpretations of (existing and new) evidence.
I understand your concerns about Crisman - the man, the legend, the disinformation and the lies. I appreciate your articulation of those concerns. They add to our understanding.
However, fundamentally, we all have the right to choose where to expend our precious research time. Some of our decisions will inevitably prove less than fertile.
Rightly or wrongly, I believe that an examination of an established psyop (or disinformation operaton) can itself help to peel back another layer of the onion skin.
Seamus Coogan Wrote:Unfortunately for our continued good relations I levelled my sights at Levenda in my new Farrell piece. Farrell quoted him. You'll see it when it comes out. But its a shame Levenda-whom I incidentally took an interest in after seeing a thread with you and Magda discussing him a while back does have some interesting stuff. But the Shaw stuff is really wack and he really let's himself down. Guy Banister the originator of the X-Files? Ummmmm right moving along!!!!!! I emailed Levenda asking for the documentation to all of this (and yes I asked politely and I didn't get a reply) am still waiting!!
I look forward to reading, and perhaps engaging with, your piece on Farrell and Levenda.
In my hardback copy of Sinister Forces, Vol One, p212, footnote 4, Peter Levenda notes several FBI files in his possession consisting (essentially) of official reports by the FBI's WG Banister about - loosely - "flying saucers". I have not seen those documents. I would very much like to see them. My instinct is to trust the author until it is proven that those documents either do not exist or do not provide the corroboration claimed for them.
Seamus Coogan Wrote:In saying that though like I say, I respect your points of views on a lot of things here and no matter when we differ its still the same. Like I said my apologies if the last few posts were a tad antagonistic. Dare I say let battle commence my good fellow!
Seamus - once again, Pax!
We may joust again over your Farrell/Levenda article. I hope our jousting will, once again, be undertaken in a spirit of respect and with the aim of advancing research still further.
I have attached a poor quality scan of a 1947 news article mentioning FBI Special Agent WG Banister investigating what turned out to be a phony "flying disk/saucer" (cymbal) incident.
The text in the scan is hard to read, so here is a transcription:
Quote:FBI Drums Up Cymbals-Like 'Disk' in Idaho
BUTTE, Mont, July 11 - AP - FBI Agent W. G. Banister said an object which appeared to be a "flying disk" was found early today at Twin Falls, Ida. , and turned over to federal authorities there.
Banister, special agent in charge of the FBI in Montana and Idaho, said the bureau had reported the discovery to the army at Fort Douglas, Utah.
An FBI agent in Twin Falls inspected the "saucer" and described it as similar to the "cymbals used by a drummer in a band, placed face to face. "
The object measured 30 1/2 inches in diameter, with a metal dome on one side and a plastic dome about 14 inches high on the opposite side...
I accept that this does not prove that Banister was in charge of some real life "X-Files", although sight of the rest of the memos cited by Levenda may make the case stronger.
Regardless of the veracity of that specific "real X-Files" claim, it does seem that both Crisman and Banister were involved in the "investigation" of "flying saucer" sightings in the immediate post-WW2 period.
David Guyatt and I (and I believe Peter Lemkin) are of the view that these "flying saucer" sightings represent something real and something archetypal. Elements of that working hypothesis can be found here.
"It means this War was never political at all, the politics was all theatre, all just to keep the people distracted...."
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War."
Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon
"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta."
The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War."
Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon
"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta."
The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war