15-01-2014, 03:43 PM
DAVID JOSEPHS:
I think we are half on the same page, and possibly half arguing semantics.
Whatever the records show about when the photos went missing (or never found in the first place, whatever you are trying to say?) I am insinuating that the "missing" photo *was shown to Oswald* and that after he caught their slight of hand, they ditched it. If you could speak to that, I would appreciate it. By "speak to that", I mean, tell me why or why not this theory is off - specifically.
Here are Oswald's words, from Mae Brussell's,
source: http://www.maebrussell.com/Mae%20Brussel...swald.html
6:00 - 6:30 P.M. Interrogation, Captain Fritz's Office[size=12] "In time I will be able to show you that this is not my picture, but I don't want to answer any more questions. . . . I will not discuss this photograph [which was used on the cover of Feb. 21, 1964 Lifemagazine] without advice of an attorney. . . . There was another rifle in the building. I have seen it. Warren Caster had two rifles, a 30.06 Mauser and a .22 for his son. . . . That picture is not mine, but the face is mine. The picture has been made by superimposing my face. The other part of the picture is not me at all, and I have never seen this picture before. I understand photography real well, and that, in time, I will be able to show you that is not my picture and that it has been made by someone else. . . . It was entirely possible that the Police Dept. has superimposed this part of the photograph over the body of someone else. . . . The Dallas Police were the culprits. . . . The small picture was reduced from the larger one, made by some persons unknown to me. . . . Since I have been photographed at City Hall, with people taking my picture while being transferred from the office to the jail door, someone has been able to get a picture of my face, and with that, they have made this picture. . . .I never kept a rifle at Mrs. Paine's garage at Irving, Tex. . . . We had no visitors at our apartment on North Beckley. . . .I have no receipts for purchase of any gun, and I have never ordered any guns. I do not own a rifle, never possessed a rifle. . . . I will not say who wrote A. J. Hidell on my Selective Service card. [It was later confirmed that Marina Oswald wrote in the name Hidell.] . . . I will not tell you the purpose of carrying the card or the use I made of it. . . . The address book in my possession has the names of Russian immigrants in Dallas, Tex., whom I have visited."
IM CONFUSED ABOUT YOUR "MY THEORY IS PREMATURE" SECTION ...
Read the above interrogation words of Oswald. HE *WAS* SHOWN THE PICTURES.
Are you saying that Fritz's diary disputes this? What ARE you saying? (this is friendly, not accusatory - trying to get to the meat here)
Regarding your statements to which I am somewhat confused about the nature of the subjects position in the 3 photos shown at the top of your other post.
I can not discern exactly what you are trying to prove or disprove about my statements, but I ask you to once again look at the photo on the left, and the photo on the right.
Is it *not apparent to you* that both photos use an IDENTICAL EMPTY BACK YARD PHOTO as the basis for the photo ... except the one on the right the photo is cropped in closer and blown up slightly before a slightly larger "oswald" image is inserted?
I BELIEVE THIS IS WHAT OSWALD WAS REFERING TO IN HIS INTERROGATION!
If you look at the photo on the right, it IS slightly smaller in dimensions. Oswald is possibly claiming this one (on the right) "was reduced" from the larger one (left).
I also believe this is probably why the photo on the right "disappeared" (or however you want to semantically phrase it) ...
IT WAS INCRIMINATING OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT to have two obviously "related" (made from the same blank BYP) "different" photos of Oswald.
Even Oswald, with his naked eye could discern this trickery. [assuming my theory holds water]
Now -- i will leave you to respond, if you so choose.
Thanks
[/SIZE]
I think we are half on the same page, and possibly half arguing semantics.
Whatever the records show about when the photos went missing (or never found in the first place, whatever you are trying to say?) I am insinuating that the "missing" photo *was shown to Oswald* and that after he caught their slight of hand, they ditched it. If you could speak to that, I would appreciate it. By "speak to that", I mean, tell me why or why not this theory is off - specifically.
Here are Oswald's words, from Mae Brussell's,
source: http://www.maebrussell.com/Mae%20Brussel...swald.html
6:00 - 6:30 P.M. Interrogation, Captain Fritz's Office[size=12] "In time I will be able to show you that this is not my picture, but I don't want to answer any more questions. . . . I will not discuss this photograph [which was used on the cover of Feb. 21, 1964 Lifemagazine] without advice of an attorney. . . . There was another rifle in the building. I have seen it. Warren Caster had two rifles, a 30.06 Mauser and a .22 for his son. . . . That picture is not mine, but the face is mine. The picture has been made by superimposing my face. The other part of the picture is not me at all, and I have never seen this picture before. I understand photography real well, and that, in time, I will be able to show you that is not my picture and that it has been made by someone else. . . . It was entirely possible that the Police Dept. has superimposed this part of the photograph over the body of someone else. . . . The Dallas Police were the culprits. . . . The small picture was reduced from the larger one, made by some persons unknown to me. . . . Since I have been photographed at City Hall, with people taking my picture while being transferred from the office to the jail door, someone has been able to get a picture of my face, and with that, they have made this picture. . . .I never kept a rifle at Mrs. Paine's garage at Irving, Tex. . . . We had no visitors at our apartment on North Beckley. . . .I have no receipts for purchase of any gun, and I have never ordered any guns. I do not own a rifle, never possessed a rifle. . . . I will not say who wrote A. J. Hidell on my Selective Service card. [It was later confirmed that Marina Oswald wrote in the name Hidell.] . . . I will not tell you the purpose of carrying the card or the use I made of it. . . . The address book in my possession has the names of Russian immigrants in Dallas, Tex., whom I have visited."
IM CONFUSED ABOUT YOUR "MY THEORY IS PREMATURE" SECTION ...
Read the above interrogation words of Oswald. HE *WAS* SHOWN THE PICTURES.
Are you saying that Fritz's diary disputes this? What ARE you saying? (this is friendly, not accusatory - trying to get to the meat here)
Regarding your statements to which I am somewhat confused about the nature of the subjects position in the 3 photos shown at the top of your other post.
I can not discern exactly what you are trying to prove or disprove about my statements, but I ask you to once again look at the photo on the left, and the photo on the right.
Is it *not apparent to you* that both photos use an IDENTICAL EMPTY BACK YARD PHOTO as the basis for the photo ... except the one on the right the photo is cropped in closer and blown up slightly before a slightly larger "oswald" image is inserted?
I BELIEVE THIS IS WHAT OSWALD WAS REFERING TO IN HIS INTERROGATION!
If you look at the photo on the right, it IS slightly smaller in dimensions. Oswald is possibly claiming this one (on the right) "was reduced" from the larger one (left).
I also believe this is probably why the photo on the right "disappeared" (or however you want to semantically phrase it) ...
IT WAS INCRIMINATING OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT to have two obviously "related" (made from the same blank BYP) "different" photos of Oswald.
Even Oswald, with his naked eye could discern this trickery. [assuming my theory holds water]
Now -- i will leave you to respond, if you so choose.
Thanks
[/SIZE]