Deep Political seepage from the deep on Sandy Hook massacre
|
Deep Political seepage from the deep on Sandy Hook massacre
|
04-06-2015, 08:36 PM
I only included a brief line or two about Sandy Hook in my book. You really can go deep down the rabbit hole here.
I wrote a recent article about my feelings on the story on my blog https://donaldjeffries.wordpress.com/201...-question/ for anyone who may be interested.
04-06-2015, 08:54 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-06-2015, 02:15 AM by Drew Phipps.)
It would seem that the shadow time applet and google earth software might produce a date and time for the disputed Oswald BYP as well. Wonder if anyone has done that?
37 25.1 18 N 122 05 36 W Oswald must be standing on the south side of the building for the sunlight to strike him (in Texas). Judging from the picture, he's near the southeast corner of the building.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis." Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease." Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
05-06-2015, 04:12 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-01-2016, 05:00 AM by Peter Lemkin.)
Drew Phipps Wrote:It would seem that the shadow time applet and google earth software might produce a date and time for the disputed Oswald BYP as well. Wonder if anyone has done that? Without going into details...which belong on another thread and are long and complex, I am 99.99999999% sure that no 'Oswald' [either/any of them] was standing in that photo! There was a non-Marina photographer and a stand in to set 'Oswald' up....then some fairly poor cut and paste of the head and papers - maybe on one even the rifle....and the many various versions made. I have a version that has not been made public - and were all too many versions already. As far as time and sun angle et al. Tom Wilson, to my knowledge, did the best calculations on that....down to the angles the objects are facing and the day and time of day. His work is a treasure trove that most don't know about and sadly his family is not allowing to be in the public domain. Only one authorized book on his work exists and it is opaque on many issues and doesn't go into others. I was one of the few researchers to have known Tom and had some idea what he was looking into and how...and I think his work has been horribly mis-understood and ignored. To most it is unknown and/or unknowable. He was a computer genius and fell into the JFK Quagmire from a rather right-of-center-trusting-of-authority viewpoint; but by the end of his life that was all gone.......all!
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn "If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
05-06-2015, 12:50 PM
I read somewhere that Tom Wilson fixed the time of the photos at 9:12 in the morning, while Marina claimed the early afternoon. It would be interesting to see what the software the Sandy Hook guy uses (above) says.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis." Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease." Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
06-06-2015, 12:51 AM
Don Jeffries Wrote:I only included a brief line or two about Sandy Hook in my book. You really can go deep down the rabbit hole here. That's a good overview, Don. The bit about the priest reminded me of this: It's speculative, but my gut feeling is that this represents at least part of the puzzle.
“The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him.â€
― Leo Tolstoy,
19-12-2015, 06:10 PM
"We'll know our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the American public believes is false." --William J. Casey, D.C.I
"We will lead every revolution against us." --Theodore Herzl
22-12-2015, 12:34 AM
I'm reading the free PDF of the book Nobody Died at Sandy Hook by Mike Palecek and Jim Fetzer. It's a bunch of blog posts compiled together without being edited to remove the repetition. So far, it's like all of Fetzer's work - focusing on the wrong things, sloppy research, trying to defend extreme theories: nobody died, everything was staged, the school hadn't been operating for 4 years. It makes more sense that it was a Gladio-style attack done by a professional shooter(s), with the body of Adam Lanza (the patsy) left at the scene.
02-01-2016, 02:19 AM
New documentary: The Life of Adam:
“The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him.â€
― Leo Tolstoy,
03-01-2016, 12:52 AM
Lots of very interesting info in this video.
“The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him.â€
― Leo Tolstoy, 
03-01-2016, 05:02 PM
Tracy Riddle Wrote:I'm reading the free PDF of the book Nobody Died at Sandy Hook by Mike Palecek and Jim Fetzer. It's a bunch of blog posts compiled together without being edited to remove the repetition. So far, it's like all of Fetzer's work - focusing on the wrong things, sloppy research, trying to defend extreme theories: nobody died, everything was staged, the school hadn't been operating for 4 years. It makes more sense that it was a Gladio-style attack done by a professional shooter(s), with the body of Adam Lanza (the patsy) left at the scene. Thanks for this Tracy. I could not get the pdf to open up. Fetzer sent it to me, and I saw others posting it on fb, but I think it may just be too big. There are lots of strange things about this case, but that nobody died is not one of them. I have a good friend back in MA who is a retired school teacher. One of her students lost his favorite cousin there. Went to the funeral, came back to school very distraught. I long ago decided that Fetzer is either a total nut or a disinfo agent. When I was researching this case I found others who lost people too. I will be the first to admit that I do not have a clue what the true story is: For example all the homes on Christmas Day 09 for $0.00 to people connected with this event. Much more...but I cannot believe the entire town would be in on such a lie. Dawn |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
