Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
ON FILM: Ruby and Oswald at TSBD?
#11
David Josephs Wrote:
Greg Burnham Wrote:Check out the brief glimpse of an Oswald (Lovelady) look-a-like at frame 13 [right in the center] -- spliced.

Is this who you were referring to Greg?

I don't think so.

I believe that Greg is referring to the face visible at the 13-second mark -- an LHO look-alike if ever there were one. The image is visible for barely a full second, and I don't know how to isolate the particular section of the video for reproduction here.

But it is, by far, the most interesting part of what we're looking at.
Reply
#12
and I included the same angle of view of his face from just before he is killed by Ruby...


Attached Files
.jpg   oswald elsewhere.jpg (Size: 224.92 KB / Downloads: 19)
Reply
#13
So I pulled only the frames with this person in them... and created a gif...

DJ


Attached Files
.gif   Oswald-in-DP-afterward---maybe.gif (Size: 440.58 KB / Downloads: 26)
Reply
#14
Charles Drago Wrote:Is this a dangle directed at Fetzer/Cinque Studios?

Yes.

And you risk being culpable and complicit.

This herring is as red as red can be.....
"It means this War was never political at all, the politics was all theatre, all just to keep the people distracted...."
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War."

Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon

"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta."
The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war
Reply
#15
Jan Klimkowski Wrote:
Charles Drago Wrote:Is this a dangle directed at Fetzer/Cinque Studios?

Yes.

And you risk being culpable and complicit.

This herring is as red as red can be.....

Hang on a second...

Oswald WAS in DP after the assassination... regardless of how he left which was more likely what Craig saw than Bledsoe
Ruby was in DP after the assassination (Cancellare as he walks up to the Overpass and one where he is in front of the TSBD - or maybe his brother)

Do we really feel it impossible that none of the films/photos would capture him/them?

The only way Oswald is not in front of the TSBD is if he left thru the rear... which I believe we have shown in the past that he did not...
Either out to the bus... which I also believe we've disproven, or into the Rambler.

Interesting how that comment about Mrs Paine and the Rambler does not make it into the notes.... anyone's notes...
only Craig's.

I'm sorry but I fail to understand how them being in DP in these films is a red herring... and noone is saying it's them... we're just trying to do a reasonable comparison.

DJ
Reply
#16
Certainly worthy of consideration, by all means. But, my first reaction was that the LHO image appears a few years younger and a few inches shorter than LHO. The JLR image appears heavier around the waist than other pictures of JLR from that time frame. JMO.

This is in reference to Post # 1, and the persons id'd in the video as Lee Harvey Oswald and Jack Leon Ruby.
Sherlock

Larry
StudentofAssassinationResearch

Reply
#17
One thing this clip makes clear to me is how easy it would be to mistake someone of a similar build and with similar clothing for Oswald. If I had been a withness to the Tippit shooting and saw this figure runing away, or had I seen this fellow running down the hill and getting into the Rambler, I might say he was the same guy as the one arrested in the Theatre. This coukd very easily be the Oswald impersonator.
Reply
#18
Jan Klimkowski Wrote:
Charles Drago Wrote:Is this a dangle directed at Fetzer/Cinque Studios?

Yes.

And you risk being culpable and complicit.

This herring is as red as red can be.....

Just maybe my main point in bringing this up -- after it had been introduced into the blood stream at the EF Swamp -- was to expose the dangling herring.

You know ... preemption and what not.

I'm willing to accept that my method may be ill-considered.

But "culpable and complicit"?

Au contraire.
Reply
#19
Peter Lemkin Wrote:At first look....could be....but can't be more sure without some photo enhancement of stills. That appears to be just some 5-10 minutes after the shooting....perhaps. Why was this never noted before?

Well, yes, indeed. Why now? Where is this from?
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx

"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.

“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
Reply
#20
David Josephs Wrote:
Jan Klimkowski Wrote:
Charles Drago Wrote:Is this a dangle directed at Fetzer/Cinque Studios?

Yes.

And you risk being culpable and complicit.

This herring is as red as red can be.....


I'm sorry but I fail to understand how them being in DP in these films is a red herring... and noone is saying it's them... we're just trying to do a reasonable comparison.

DJ

If I may: Jan is suggesting that this footage is the red herring -- a subtle but all-important distinction.

I brought this djinn to DPF because it previously had been let out of the bottle and could not be allowed to wreak havoc without voices of reason bringing forward the likelihood that it is a provocation.

I wrote "likelihood," not "certainty."

Reasonable analysis of the footage presented in advance of a Fetzerian rush to judgment is, in my opinion, the best way to expose the operation -- if that's what it is.

And right now, I'm of the just-shy-of-firm opinion that it is.

By all means let's continue to evaluate -- with the utmost of caution.

And, of course, out in the open.

Sunlight is the best disinfectant.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  DARNELL film Original Richard Gilbride 3 111 20-09-2024, 04:32 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  If the case against Oswald was legitimate Gil Jesus 0 185 04-07-2024, 12:11 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Why the Government's Case Against Oswald is BS --- Part III Gil Jesus 0 467 10-12-2023, 12:08 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Why the Govenment's Case Against Oswald is BS --- Part II Gil Jesus 1 518 28-11-2023, 03:36 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Why the Government's case against Oswald is BS --- Part I Gil Jesus 1 550 15-11-2023, 04:55 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Sarah Stanton (i.e. PrayerMan) in Dan Owens film Richard Gilbride 7 2,033 01-10-2023, 03:25 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Thomas Kelley reports Oswald said he did not view parade Richard Gilbride 1 593 26-09-2023, 04:31 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Evidence of Witness Tampering in the case against Oswald Gil Jesus 0 593 28-07-2023, 11:31 AM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  The REAL reason Oswald went to Irving on 11.21.63 Gil Jesus 1 718 15-06-2023, 03:46 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  The Conspiracy to Kill Lee Harvey Oswald --- Conclusion Gil Jesus 1 866 01-04-2023, 04:23 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)