Please Warn Rachel Maddow

[Jim DiEugenio]

http://www.ctka.net/rachel_maddow_gun_control.html

Promulgating a lie to try and prop up a good cause gets us nowhere.

Please, Rachel, don't let Chris Matthews tell you what to do.

You will lose a lot of good people who back you.

[Albert Doyle]

This is probably a move by the powers that be to have the interface between conspiracy advocates and their closest contact in the form of the left media rip away and send those advocates drifting downward into a dark memory hole while they are now officially ignored. Never underestimate those bastards. The powers that killed Kennedy are still at work.

Ignoring is never a good thing Mr D. You are about to get your turn. Look up and see Rachel getting smaller as you sink away and the last vestige of media hope pretends you don't exist.

[Dawn Meredith]

http://www.ctka.net/rachel_maddow_gun_control.html

Promulgating a lie to try and prop up a good cause gets us nowhere.

Please, Rachel, don't let Chris Matthews tell you what to do.

You will lose a lot of good people who back you.

She's lost me. I don't think it is Matthews telling her, way higher than that.
Too bad. She has to know better.
Say nothing but don't promote the damn lie.
I have messaged her via her fb page many times over the years on this to no avail.
Superstar that she is she likely does not see it.
She sold her soul.

Dawn

[David Healy]

[quote=Jim DiEugenio]http://www.ctka.net/rachel_maddow_gun_control.html

...

She sold her soul.

Dawn

damn EGO gets them every time!

[Phil Dragoo]

This jabberwocky on gun control?

No, it's government control, and she has bowed down.

A Mannlicher-Carcano did not book a flight from O'Hare to Love Field and take up a position in Dunkel's IN basket.

A crossfire reflecting the Inconvenient Man of Peace's problem to the Sponsors which you, Rachel Maddow, now serve.

It is beyond obscene.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]4514[/ATTACH]

[LR Trotter]

http://www.ctka.net/rachel_maddow_gun_control.html

Promulgating a lie to try and prop up a good cause gets us nowhere.

Please, Rachel, don't let Chris Matthews tell you what to do.

You will lose a lot of good people who back you.

Thanks for the letter Mr DiEugenio. As always and as usual, I have high hopes for a significant response. But, admittedly, I have very low expectations. And, I appreciate Ms Maddow as a journalist.

:ballchain:

[Jim DiEugenio]

I had a high regard Cockburn and Navasky as journalists too.

THen I got a load of their stuff on JFK.

And I understood one of two things:

1. Either they were not being honest and consistent in their ethics,

2. Or, they understood that there was very little reward on any side--right or left or MSM--in writing about the true facts of the JFK case.

Neither one reflects well on their journalism or relationship with the Power Elite.

And Maddow has now joined the club.

[Dawn Meredith]

http://www.ctka.net/rachel_maddow_gun_control.html

Promulgating a lie to try and prop up a good cause gets us nowhere.

Please, Rachel, don't let Chris Matthews tell you what to do.

You will lose a lot of good people who back you.

Excellent letter Jim. But don't expect a reply.

I doubt she even reads her own mail.

I so hate MSM.

I watch HLN- headline news -on the latest murder trials. And such.
Real news. Not lies of CNN< Fox and now MSNBC.
Will miss your Rachel. You did some good work.
Especially on "The family".
But, THIS will be your last words to me.
You Chris and the other liars are MSNBC all enjoy a great paycheck.
Lots to be made selling one's soul.
While pretending to have journalistic integrity.

Dawn

[Matthew Poe]

I think its very possible that Maddow believes the Warren consensus whole-heartedly and is not even being especially cynical. (Establishment media players tend to be very credulous folks, especially the newer crop.) Under this hypothesis, the thought of looking into the case wouldn't even occur to her because she's been brainwashed to think that any facts--no matter how solid or reasonably presented--that point towards a conspiracy is just jibberish beyond the pale of reasonable discourse. They don't even register. When it comes to anything CT related these types take Hofstader's essay "The Paranoid Style of American Politics" as gospel. To them, the %80 who believe in conspiracy are rubes or neurotics losing their status. You've all read the thing.

Educating just one, like say, Hayes, that really young kid on MSNBC, would go along away. But its almost like if you've made it to the establishment its because you have no curiosity for deep politics. I don't think it was always that way in journalism.

[Jim DiEugenio]

You would be surprised at how much these people actually do know.

See, this subject is so huge and insinuating that anyone in the news business comes up against it sooner or later. Or anyone interested in politics and current events finds it.

I would be really surprised if she knows nothing about it..

I mean she had to see Stone's movie.