Posts: 56
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,374
Threads: 149
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2010
15-09-2015, 07:38 PM
(This post was last modified: 15-09-2015, 07:57 PM by Albert Doyle.)
1) I've never seen those buttons before. So why are they showing up now and what process made them visible?
2) Your arrow reference does not show anything that I can detect as a match on the woman in the doorway. I don't see the buttons you are lining up.
3) Your scarf lady has no matching features that I can detect that make her worth comparing to Prayer Man.
4) The paranoid side of me detects a pearl collar necklace photoshopped onto Prayer Man's neck in the new shot.
5) Do you realize your arrow woman and your scarf woman are two different people and therefore can't both be Prayer Man?
.
Posts: 56
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
Albert Doyle Wrote:1) I've never seen those buttons before. So why are they showing up now and what process made them visible?
2) Your arrow reference does not show anything that I can detect as a match on the woman in the doorway. I don't see the buttons you are lining up.
3) Your scarf lady has no matching features that I can detect that make her worth comparing to Prayer Man.
4) The paranoid side of me detects a pearl collar necklace photoshopped onto Prayer Man's neck in the new shot.
5) Do you realize your arrow woman and your scarf woman are two different people and therefore can't both be Prayer Man?
.
1./ I don't know why they are showing up, they just do. My image is just a simple blow up of one of the usual highly pixelated frames
2./ They are not meant to represent a match, only to show that some women wore long coats with visible buttons on that day in Dallas.
3./ I see matches, you don't, that's fine.
4./ If any Photoshop work was done on the image, which I don't detect, it wasn't me, and I don't see a pearl collar necklace.
5./ The button woman is not meant to represent Prayer Woman.
Posts: 5,374
Threads: 149
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2010
Duncan,
I don't see how you couldn't automatically detect that scarf woman can't be Prayer Man because the white-colored scarf automatically conflicts with Prayer Man's dark hair.
Posts: 56
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
Albert Doyle Wrote:Duncan,
I don't see how you couldn't automatically detect that scarf woman can't be Prayer Man because the white-colored scarf automatically conflicts with Prayer Man's dark hair.
The top back of the head / hair section of Prayer Woman's head is not visible in any of the pixelated frames, so any analysis of the issue raised is subjective.
Posts: 5,374
Threads: 149
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2010
Duncan MacRae Wrote:The top back of the head / hair section of Prayer Woman's head is not visible in any of the pixelated frames, so any analysis of the issue raised is subjective.
No way. That's an incompetent analysis that automatically disqualifies you.
Prayer Man obviously has dark hair covering his head. If you look at your scarf woman she has 2/3rds of her head covered by white scarf. There's just no way that would not be visible on Prayer Man.
Jesus Duncan. Learn how to analyze photos.
Posts: 56
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
Albert Doyle Wrote:Duncan MacRae Wrote:The top back of the head / hair section of Prayer Woman's head is not visible in any of the pixelated frames, so any analysis of the issue raised is subjective.
No way. That's an incompetent analysis that automatically disqualifies you.
Prayer Man obviously has dark hair covering his head. If you look at your scarf woman she has 2/3rds of her head covered by white scarf. There's just no way that would not be visible on Prayer Man.
Jesus Duncan. Learn how to analyze photos.
~~
Absolute nonsense, the view of the scarf lady's scarf starts from behind her ears..................sheesh
Posts: 875
Threads: 45
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Nov 2011
I thought trolls weren't allowed on this forum.
Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.
Warren Commission testimony of Secret Service Agent Clinton J. Hill, 1964
Posts: 2,665
Threads: 378
Likes Received: 3 in 2 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Dec 2010
I don't understand it either.
Just because Albert brings it up, he is allowed to jump on?
Uttering such obvious BS also.
Posts: 77
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: May 2013
16-09-2015, 07:20 AM
(This post was last modified: 28-09-2015, 08:20 PM by Bart Kamp.)
.
