Posts: 5,374
Threads: 149
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2010
David Josephs Wrote:Albert Albert...
Follow please. There was no lunchroom encounter between Baker, Truly and Oswald. It did not happen that way... It happened as Baker described in the affidavit he wrote that afternoon which the WC lawyers were told about by Baker during testimony and ignored 3 successive times... Truly was not asked about who they stopped according to the affidavit... but in the lunchroom
Baker and Truly claim there was not coke to shorten the time frame
Bookout's recap of the interrogation says that Oswald DID say he had gotten a coke, THEN went downstairs for lunch, THEN the officer came in - his name is first, stated incorrectly and with the ELSBETH address which he had not lived at since Dec 1962.
The Fritz notes clearly say: "Claims 2nd floor Coke when off came in".
Mrs Reid says her encounter with Oswald occurred 2 minutes after the last shot. This would perfectly synchronize with the Baker encounter.
Fritz then writes: "To 1st floor had lunch".
Posts: 254
Threads: 5
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: May 2011
For me the fact that Baker made his affidavit while sitting in the same room as Oswald but failed to identify him, tells me the lunchroom encounter didn't happen. PM is either Oswald or a stranger/non TSBD employee, because we know the whereabouts of the other TSBD employees. If a stranger he would have had to make his way through the crowd of TSBD employees standing in front of the building to reach the position on the steps, and surely would have been noticed. If he is Oswald he could have stepped out the front door as the motorcade was approaching and everyone was focused on the Limo, thus not noticed.
Posts: 5,374
Threads: 149
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2010
Funny how Baker managed to identify the Coke that real-time witness Mrs Reid mentioned.
To me Baker not mentioning Oswald while he was sitting right in front of him bespeaks greater issues like CIA association.
If we used your logic we could say the lack of interrogation notes means the whole Police Station event didn't happen.
Posts: 150
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
Sorry, misread something.
Posts: 875
Threads: 45
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Nov 2011
Albert Doyle Wrote:Funny how Baker managed to identify the Coke that real-time witness Mrs Reid mentioned.
To me Baker not mentioning Oswald while he was sitting right in front of him bespeaks greater issues like CIA association.
If we used your logic we could say the lack of interrogation notes means the whole Police Station event didn't happen.
How can you prove that Baker identified Oswald with a Coke?
Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.
Warren Commission testimony of Secret Service Agent Clinton J. Hill, 1964
Posts: 5,374
Threads: 149
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2010
Because he tried to get rid of it.
Posts: 875
Threads: 45
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Nov 2011
Albert Doyle Wrote:Because he tried to get rid of it.
I don't follow you. Explain please.
Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.
Warren Commission testimony of Secret Service Agent Clinton J. Hill, 1964
Posts: 5,374
Threads: 149
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2010
They scratched-out the Coca Cola from the report later.
Posts: 875
Threads: 45
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Nov 2011
Albert Doyle Wrote:They scratched-out the Coca Cola from the report later.
Look at the hand writing of that FBI report. Baker's signature and the content of the note are clearly two different sets of hand writing. The FBI agent wrote the note, and Baker only signed it. Baker crossed out the reference to the Coke, and put his initials beside it.
How do you know the FBI agent did not erroneously assume Baker had seen Oswald with a Coke, and Baker merely corrected him?
Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.
Warren Commission testimony of Secret Service Agent Clinton J. Hill, 1964
Posts: 254
Threads: 5
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: May 2011
Albert Doyle Wrote:Funny how Baker managed to identify the Coke that real-time witness Mrs Reid mentioned.
To me Baker not mentioning Oswald while he was sitting right in front of him bespeaks greater issues like CIA association.
If we used your logic we could say the lack of interrogation notes means the whole Police Station event didn't happen.
Baker made no mention of the coke that day. It came up some time after when they must have been after him to help frame Oswald. I doubt Baker was part of any conspiracy from the beginning.
