Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sean Murphy's research deserves more
Mrs Reid and Truly gave affidavits to the Dallas PD the afternoon of the assassination. So it is possible the Coca Cola was inserted into Oswald's hands by the FBI agent who assumed the Coke Oswald had in his hand during the Mrs Reid encounter was also in his hand during the Baker encounter. That report was written September 23rd 1964. So Baker could have confronted Oswald in the lunch room without any Coca Cola and after Baker left Oswald could have bought the Coke and walked over to the Mrs Reid encounter. This would remove sinister intent and simply be a presumption on the dictating FBI agent's behalf.


If you step back and think about this it is still just as interesting either way. For your version to be true would put Oswald closer to the 6th floor and have Baker and Truly making an alibi for him. It would also exclude Oswald from being Prayer Man since the man was coming down the stairs.


I contend that it doesn't make sense for Baker and Truly to conspire to put Oswald further away from the 6th floor. That goes against the grain of the set-up. It also doesn't make sense that FBI would help them exonerate Oswald by putting him further away from the 6th floor. They would be much more likely to accent Oswald being caught descending the steps at the 4th floor. It makes sense to me that the difficultly here was caused by Baker running across two Oswalds two floors apart. The true hiding here is the figure at the 4th floor and not the lunch room encounter. Baker's omission could then be explained as a blown attempt to place Oswald closer to the 6th floor while hiding the double. Remember, Bernard Haire's backdoor Oswald was similarly omitted (Mr Parker ignores this while demanding evidence of doubles).


The Fritz document linked below specifies Lee Harvey Oswald was the man seen on the 3rd or 4th floor landing. Truly told of the lunch room encounter that day.


The two Oswalds theory still stands, all considered.



http://www.whokilledjfk.net/officer_m.htm



http://jfkthelonegunmanmyth.blogspot.com...r-was.html
Reply
Oswald told Fritz he went up to the second floor lunchroom to buy a coke. Maybe these clever FBI guys are adding details to reports that matches stuff Oswald said.

PS Fritz may not have taken notes, but Hosty claims he took notes while Fritz interviewed. Would make sense that Hosty might pass tidbits to his co-workers straight from Oswald's mouth. I wouldn't trust Hosty too far, though.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)

James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."

Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."

Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
Reply
Yeah, don't forget the Fritz notes.


In a way the delay of the Fritz notes is a similar burp to Baker's delay.


The short-hand of the Fritz notes could possibly allow Oswald to have purchased the Coca Cola after the Baker encounter. The long-hand could have been "Claims was on the 2nd floor getting a Coke when officer came in".


Can Oswald go to the 1st floor from Mrs Reid's desk?
Reply
So this is the combined list the DPD put together related to the names and addresses of the employees of the TSBD...

This is the sum total of everyon from that building? seems a bit short

2nd - Stringfellow's account of Oswald being arrested in the balcony includes the 605 Elsbeth Address - when he had not lived in since March 63.


[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=6889&stc=1]


Attached Files
.jpg   TSBD employee list taken right after assassination - ALL.jpg (Size: 466.08 KB / Downloads: 39)
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right.....
R. Hunter
Reply
I have been digging into this whole thing, and the earliest mention I can find, for now is 1967

https://slack-files.com/files-tmb/T04DA3...e_1024.png

In 1967 (!) Richard Bernabei , writes Weisberg, and I quote from page 4 of this doc.
http://jfk.hood.edu/...68/Item 25B.pdf

Here is another discrepancy in the pictures that Life prints.
Tina Towner was standing across the street from the TSBD doorway when
she took xxx color movies of the President as his car drove between her
and the doorway. Her movie evidently includes numerous frames that depict
all of the TSBD doorway as it passed from left to right across her films.
The ftame of Towner's movie that Life publishes on page 91 (07) shows
only a portion of the doorway; aga the right side of the doorway has
been cut from the picture. Even the sprocket holes of the insignificant
left side are shown.
Moreover, althouglwe know from other photographs and from the testimon
of witnesses that several people were standing in the doorway when Towner
took her pictures, none of those people are evident in the photo that
Life published. We know that a man resembling Ozwald ( and wearing a
shirt that is identical in every respect to the shirt that Ozwald was
wearing) was standing on the west side of the doorway when the motorcade
passed. Where is he in Towner's picture? Where are the others who are
clearly depicted in the Altgens photograph?
Towner must have photographed that man and the others; she could not
have failed. to photograph them. If her pictures do not show the man's
facial features, they must clearly show the color of his shirt, a vital
niece of information. (The shirt apnears reddish in Houghes' film, but
the whole of that picture by Houghes has a reddish tint, and it leas tal7en
et a great distance)
I suspect that a clear eicture of Ozwald and Lovelady together was
erased from thd,X6ture that Life presents on page 91. You can test that
suspicion by seeing all the frames of Tina Towner's film, or by finding
another photo of the TL;ED doorway.

To be cont.

"edit": bold type added
Reply
It's page 3 not 4.


You see this is the problem with Prayer Man. Bernabei is simply speculating that LIFE has doctored the Towner film. Meanwhile it could be due to perfectly reasonable explanations of Towner's camera not picking up the faint image of Prayer Man in the shadows. Speculation that LIFE doctored the image is similar to Fetzer's claims. Nor have I ever seen any image that is sharp enough to claim Prayer Man's shirt is similar to Oswald's.


In the image presented you can clearly see Lovelady.
Reply
You are missing the point.
"I suspect that a clear eicture of Ozwald and Lovelady together"

And it's page 4 of the PDF
Reply
Bart Kamp Wrote:You are missing the point.
"I suspect that a clear eicture of Ozwald and Lovelady together"

And it's page 4 of the PDF




That's just Bernabei saying he suspects a clear picture of Oswald (Prayer Man) and Lovelady was altered. Meanwhile there are photo analysis processes that could determine that the dark shadow Prayer Man is in matches the other dark shadows in the same picture and is therefore perfectly explainable.

Not sure what point I'm missing? It could be Bernabei's lack of photography knowledge that is to blame.
Reply
"That's just Bernabei saying he suspects a clear picture of Oswald (Prayer Man) and Lovelady was altered"
You mention it and still are missing the point.
The only claim I have made in that post is that the mention of Oswald and Lovelady together on the front steps of the TSBD was already made in 1967, nothing more.
Reply
It is interesting that Prayer Man was under analysis as early as 1967.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Roger Odisio Plants Credibility Time Bomb At Heart Of CT Research Brian Doyle 8 1,547 07-06-2024, 06:18 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Jim Hargrove Chooses Politics Over Good Research Brian Doyle 0 384 12-01-2024, 10:17 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  The JFK Research Community Is Responsible For This Brian Doyle 0 460 28-11-2023, 04:48 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  How The Education Forum Destroyed Credible JFK Research Brian Doyle 8 1,597 09-07-2023, 09:35 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  DiEugenio Betrays Conspiracy Research Brian Doyle 1 751 07-07-2023, 04:32 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  EXCELLENT Research on LHO & Ruth Hyde Paine [and family] - Linda Minor Peter Lemkin 15 40,599 29-07-2019, 08:06 PM
Last Post: Tom Scully
  JFK Research Methodology James Lateer 19 28,848 02-07-2018, 04:00 PM
Last Post: James Lateer
  Sean Murphy- wrong again!!! Richard Gilbride 15 13,068 01-02-2017, 12:18 AM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  THE ANTI-LATELL REPORT Dr. Latell’s Involution in JFK Assassination Research A RNALDO M. F ERNANDEZ Magda Hassan 0 3,102 25-12-2015, 07:19 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  UPDATED RESEARCH: Front Throat Shot Research Analysis "Z225" / Contact for free copy Anthony DeFiore 0 2,087 28-12-2014, 04:48 PM
Last Post: Anthony DeFiore

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)