Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Edwin Ekdahl's height
#11
Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Didn't Fetzer get banned from this forum for being a persistent idiot?

Trolling isn't allowed here. Speaking for myself, I found Mr. Jeffries' post most helpful.
"We'll know our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the American public believes is false." --William J. Casey, D.C.I

"We will lead every revolution against us." --Theodore Herzl
Reply
#12
Lauren Johnson Wrote:
Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Didn't Fetzer get banned from this forum for being a persistent idiot?

Trolling isn't allowed here. Speaking for myself, I found Mr. Jeffries' post most helpful.

That was the other thread Lauren, and yes... Don's post was Spot on...

Re: Fetzer... it appeared to most that it was a completely different person using/postin on the account... or that Fetz had lost his mind...
but at least he attempted to provide back-up to his argument, wrong as it was...

We will now be subject to multiple threads by this person... all leading nowhere with nothing but opinions and ad homs...

As if the is about the chlorophyll... and not the size of the forest and how under the surface the roots all interconnect...


Salandria warned us... with what was without a doubt the most ignored truth of the assassination...

Peace all... time to dance merrily thru the dandelions
DJ

::runaround::
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right.....
R. Hunter
Reply
#13
Lauren Johnson Wrote:
Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Didn't Fetzer get banned from this forum for being a persistent idiot?

Trolling isn't allowed here. Speaking for myself, I found Mr. Jeffries' post most helpful.

My post had nothing to do with Don Jeffries.
Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.

Warren Commission testimony of Secret Service Agent Clinton J. Hill, 1964
Reply
#14
Interesting replies people. I've had 2 moderator warnings for calling a comment (as opposed to a person) moronic.

Yet it seems to be Open Season on this little black duck. Any comment is a-ok with your friendly mods, so long as they are aimed at, and coming froml... me.

Where's Elmer Fudd when you need him?

But all these remarks do serve a purpose - they divert from the EVIDENCE I posted showing that the reliance on Pic's memory for Ekdahl's height was a bad call.

Given shrinkage with age, I'd say he was no more than about 5' 9 [SUP][SUB]1/2"[/SUB][/SUP] to 5' 10" in that wedding photo. And since it was her wedding photo, I'd say Marguerite was probably wearing heels - unlike later in life where her work as a practical nurse would mean flats. She of course, would also have shrunk by the time of those latter photos.

When it is looked at scientifically, instead of through the smoke and mirrors Armstrong deploys to sell his wares, there are NO discrepancies at all.
Reply
#15
As I explained Greg, when you call a person's comment "moronic" you are, by extension, saying they are moronic.

This has to cease now please.

I'm PM'ing you.
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14
Reply
#16
Greg R Parker Wrote:
Jim Hargrove Wrote:
LR Trotter Wrote:I assume the question of Edwin A Ekdahl's height is an effort to compare the relative height of a person known as Marguerite Francis Claverie Pic Oswald Ekdahl. If so, I am curious as to any side by side comparison photographs being available showing "Lee's" mother and "Harvey's" mother. According to IMDb, Marguerite Francis Claverie/Pic/Oswald/Ekdahl died on January 17, 1981, in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas.
:Confusedhock::

Wish we had that picture, but it probably doesn't exist. Here, though, is a picture of short Marguerite looking up at short Marina.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]5825[/ATTACH]

For one, she is not looking "up" at Marina, unless she is cross-eyed, she is looking behind Marina. As I said before, people shrink with age. I am certain you already knew that. We also cannot see the whole person. Marguerite looks like she is stooped to me. There is also perspective to take into account. Without that perspective, you would have to judge the man in the white hat to be also rather short, since sans perspective, he looks only a few inches taller than Marguerite.

Please look at the pic of the other Marguerite and try to convince anyone this is the same person. The lack of resemblance is beyond stunning. You also have yet to reply to the question asked first by Jim Hargrove, then DJ then me (twice). Have you READ Harvey and Lee? It is a simple yes or no question.
Dawn
Reply
#17
Dawn Meredith Wrote:
Greg R Parker Wrote:
Jim Hargrove Wrote:
LR Trotter Wrote:I assume the question of Edwin A Ekdahl's height is an effort to compare the relative height of a person known as Marguerite Francis Claverie Pic Oswald Ekdahl. If so, I am curious as to any side by side comparison photographs being available showing "Lee's" mother and "Harvey's" mother. According to IMDb, Marguerite Francis Claverie/Pic/Oswald/Ekdahl died on January 17, 1981, in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas.
:Confusedhock::

Wish we had that picture, but it probably doesn't exist. Here, though, is a picture of short Marguerite looking up at short Marina.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]5825[/ATTACH]

For one, she is not looking "up" at Marina, unless she is cross-eyed, she is looking behind Marina. As I said before, people shrink with age. I am certain you already knew that. We also cannot see the whole person. Marguerite looks like she is stooped to me. There is also perspective to take into account. Without that perspective, you would have to judge the man in the white hat to be also rather short, since sans perspective, he looks only a few inches taller than Marguerite.

Please look at the pic of the other Marguerite and try to convince anyone this is the same person. The lack of resemblance is beyond stunning. You also have yet to reply to the question asked first by Jim Hargrove, then DJ then me (twice). Have you READ Harvey and Lee? It is a simple yes or no question.
Dawn


No Dawn.. he has not...obviously. Nor the notebooks, nor the documents on the CD that comes with the book...

He makes arguments about tonsils and heights (the stems of leaves rather than the tree itself) and thinks we are going to applaud him for his insights and debating abilities like the 1 moderator and 3 members at his "forum"... (which doesn't even qualify as a minyan to sit shiva).

He offers carbon copy FBI reports referencing the wrong years and does so with pride.... and only opinions about people who MAY have done this or COULD have done that since he can't see it any other way... or offer any evidence to support them.

THIS is the type of person we want discussing the case here? A man who needs yet another to fend for him and plead that we accept his bona fides cause he's done something elsewhere that was equally as weak...?

I may be channeling Charles here ... and I do so gladly...

he needs to

::gtfo::
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right.....
R. Hunter
Reply
#18
David and Dawn and several others are right on the mark that this nonsense should end now.

I feel guilty because I helped this situation occur by telling Parker to post his evidence right here rather than send us scurrying to some other place to see it. It never occurred to me that he would just make up so much crap and present it as fact. If anyone thinks that is an unfair statement, please just read through the tonsil thread, and If I have to be censored for calling Parker's crap what it is, so be it!!!

This is a huge waste of time. I hereby retract my invitation to Parker to post his stuff here, urge him to go away, and apologize to all for my role in making this nonsense happen.

Jim
Reply
#19
Jim Hargrove Wrote:David and Dawn and several others are right on the mark that this nonsense should end now.

I feel guilty because I helped this situation occur by telling Parker to post his evidence right here rather than send us scurrying to some other place to see it. It never occurred to me that he would just make up so much crap and present it as fact. If anyone thinks that is an unfair statement, please just read through the tonsil thread, and If I have to be censored for calling Parker's crap what it is, so be it!!!

This is a huge waste of time. I hereby retract my invitation to Parker to post his stuff here, urge him to go away, and apologize to all for my role in making this nonsense happen.

Jim

Hmm. A moderator here has asked EVERYONE to discuss the evidence and not play the man. I assume then, that you all the others have had warning messages?

Ohhh.... I can see a flying pig !!!

What "crap" have I made up, Jim? I have posted documentary evidence that as a young man, Ekdahl was between 5'10" and 5'11". Dd you mean I made up that people shrink with age? If so, it is you who needs to stop living in fantasy land. It is a scientific fact. http://www.uamshealth.com/?id=12264&sid=1

Marguerite was NEVER tall and it is you, Armstrong and his supporters who have latched onto Pic's faulty memory and misinterpretion of photos to prop this nonsense up.

I know this is heresy. I know giving you the facts means I am in danger of being moderated, but someone has to do it.
Reply
#20
Jim Hargrove Wrote:
LR Trotter Wrote:I assume the question of Edwin A Ekdahl's height is an effort to compare the relative height of a person known as Marguerite Francis Claverie Pic Oswald Ekdahl. If so, I am curious as to any side by side comparison photographs being available showing "Lee's" mother and "Harvey's" mother. According to IMDb, Marguerite Francis Claverie/Pic/Oswald/Ekdahl died on January 17, 1981, in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas.
:Confusedhock::

Wish we had that picture, but it probably doesn't exist. Here, though, is a picture of short Marguerite looking up at short Marina.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]5825[/ATTACH]
It does appear that Russian born Marina Nikolayevna Prusakova/Oswald/Porter is not a tall person. But, I do wonder, as I wander, how "not tall" is she? By observing various photographs with others nearby, I would have to guess her height to be about 5' 4", +/- 1".

:Shrug:

Larry
StudentofAssassinationResearch

Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  John T Martin: Filmed on same reel: Edwin Walker's Home, Oswald NOLA Leaflets Distribution Tom Scully 1 2,494 10-03-2023, 09:34 AM
Last Post: Tom Scully
  On Edwin Kaiser and Related Topics Scott Kaiser 981 440,714 17-12-2019, 04:02 PM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  All About Edwin Kaiser Peter Lemkin 6 8,676 23-03-2018, 04:57 AM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  The Edwin Walker Collection Tracy Riddle 2 3,430 18-03-2016, 02:47 PM
Last Post: Tracy Riddle
  General Edwin "Ted" Walker Drew Phipps 9 6,956 01-08-2014, 06:03 AM
Last Post: Drew Phipps
  Edwin Kaiser's address book and Oswald Magda Hassan 8 7,385 30-04-2014, 04:17 PM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  Oswald's height as given in PS 44 records Greg R Parker 61 16,888 11-04-2014, 01:28 AM
Last Post: David Josephs
  Height and Shoulders Herbert Blenner 1 2,548 11-04-2014, 01:10 AM
Last Post: David Josephs
  Who Was Edwin Albert Ekdahl, Stepfather of Lee Harvey Oswald? Peter Lemkin 1 4,548 17-04-2013, 11:13 PM
Last Post: David Josephs
  The Chicago Plot: Edwin Black's Ground-Breaking Investigation Charles Drago 5 7,900 29-05-2011, 03:06 PM
Last Post: Charles Drago

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)