24-03-2015, 03:59 PM
(This post was last modified: 24-03-2015, 08:33 PM by Scott Kaiser.)
You gotta love supporting evidence, don'tcah? I mean, lets for a moment forget about what my father shared with me on the day he was killed, and look at a much bigger picture.
Mrs. Lorenz's story was dropped by researchers just as fast as it was over by trial in Miami. Lack of evidence. A short recap of her story implicates Frank Sturgis, Orlando Bosch, Pedro Diaz Lanz, two unnamed Cubans and Lee Oswald.
In her movie she names the same individuals, but also adds Hemming.
Hemming denies going to Dallas, but admits there was a caravan, and he was invited to go by Pedro Diaz Lanz and his brother Marcos Diaz Lanz.
Are you with me so far?
Enter Hunt's deathbed confession to his son St. John Hunt. Hunt starts off by saying "I heard from Frank", and admits he was a bench warmer on the "Big Event", but what Hunt does is go a step further and implicates David Morales, Frank Sturgis, a French gunman and LBJ.
Hunt says, "I have a reputation for honesty", but lets face it, he also generated false cables. Was he just a pro at propaganda for the CIA? Maybe? Who knows how far he really decided to tell the truth in his deathbed confession to his son.
Then enter's Mr. Micheal Canfield who shows photos to Dallas police officer Seymour Weitzman who identifies Barnard Barker as the Secret Service agent standing at the Grassy Knoll while all other SS agents left to Parkland Hos.
Now, you have Rudy Junco who says he drove my father to the CIA Headquarters in Miami where my father impersonates a CIA agent to gain access of the premises where he steals the only known photographs of Frank Sturgis, Howard Hunt, Gordon Liddy, David Morales and Barnard Barker, there is no photos of Lee Oswald, Hemming, the Diaz Lanz brother's, Orlando Bosch, or two unnamed Cubans.
However, the story Mrs. Lornez told the FBI their document says there were.
Finally, there is a mountain of questionable evidence that seems to indicate the following. In my father's address book there is two entries of Lee. The first Lee appears to be the brother of Elias Chajet, Elias was a long time friend of Barnard Barker for ten years, and is introduced to Frank Sturgis by my father, the first Lee was in the hospital for having what my father called "blood sickness" when he meant leukemia.
The second Lee appears above the name of Frank Fernnie aka Fiorini aka Sturgis. William Pawley then enters the picture. My father quotes Pawley saying "spending my money on getting rid of Kennedy was my best investment".
Wasn't Pawley working with Morales?
My father enters the United States on January 1960, and devotes his life to the arm services. My father is given a French Visa, then almost immediately gets involved with stealing government property, fuel and two M-2 carbines from a government vehicle during "Operation Willow Freeze" in Alaska 1961.
Those guns were never recovered by the government.
Between 1962 and 69 my father travels to Miami, Connecticut, Alaska and back to Miami.
However, there's a cable dated August 16, 1974 regarding FBI Security Supervisor from Dallas contacting a Security Supervisor in Miami about my father.
Apparently, the FBI was investigating my father, and it wasn't for impersonating an officer of the United States, he was already under investigation since 1971 for that charge.
As far as I know, my father never visited any military bases in Dallas.
This investigation would require a subpoena and three months effort to "obtain desired info". What info? Subpoena who?
Is my father confessing as to who the players involved in the Big Event were? Did my father feel somewhat guilty when he says, Five of the six men involved in Watergate were from the Bay of Pigs. 6 out of 6 from Miami. All involved at one time or another with Cuba and her problems.
I know my father was not involved in the Bay of Pigs, but he was recruited by Frank Sturgis as the sixth burglar in Watergate.
My father, Lee, perhaps, (Oswald), the Navarro brothers and Frank Sturgis all knew each other prior to 1963.
Later, my father orders a hit on Navarro for "treason", and says the U.S. government wants him assassinated. Navarro narrowly escapes while alluding two gunmen at his house.
Both Navarro brother's would later be killed in a car accident.
You have to ask yourself, whose story sounds more plausible? Courtroom drama, a deathbed confession, Seymour Weitzman, a Dallas police officer who identifies Barnard Barker, Jim Rothstein who arrest Sturgis for an attempt to commit harm to Mrs. Lorenz, Rudy Junco who says he drove my father to the CIA Headquarters or Edwin Kaiser's questionable evidence?
Or, all above?
Perhaps, the better question is whose name keeps popping up over and over again.
When Scott Kaiser receives the tapes from Howard Liebengood he'll play ALL the tapes to have a better understanding of our lost history events in order to see who's telling the truth.
Mrs. Lorenz's story was dropped by researchers just as fast as it was over by trial in Miami. Lack of evidence. A short recap of her story implicates Frank Sturgis, Orlando Bosch, Pedro Diaz Lanz, two unnamed Cubans and Lee Oswald.
In her movie she names the same individuals, but also adds Hemming.
Hemming denies going to Dallas, but admits there was a caravan, and he was invited to go by Pedro Diaz Lanz and his brother Marcos Diaz Lanz.
Are you with me so far?
Enter Hunt's deathbed confession to his son St. John Hunt. Hunt starts off by saying "I heard from Frank", and admits he was a bench warmer on the "Big Event", but what Hunt does is go a step further and implicates David Morales, Frank Sturgis, a French gunman and LBJ.
Hunt says, "I have a reputation for honesty", but lets face it, he also generated false cables. Was he just a pro at propaganda for the CIA? Maybe? Who knows how far he really decided to tell the truth in his deathbed confession to his son.
Then enter's Mr. Micheal Canfield who shows photos to Dallas police officer Seymour Weitzman who identifies Barnard Barker as the Secret Service agent standing at the Grassy Knoll while all other SS agents left to Parkland Hos.
Now, you have Rudy Junco who says he drove my father to the CIA Headquarters in Miami where my father impersonates a CIA agent to gain access of the premises where he steals the only known photographs of Frank Sturgis, Howard Hunt, Gordon Liddy, David Morales and Barnard Barker, there is no photos of Lee Oswald, Hemming, the Diaz Lanz brother's, Orlando Bosch, or two unnamed Cubans.
However, the story Mrs. Lornez told the FBI their document says there were.
Finally, there is a mountain of questionable evidence that seems to indicate the following. In my father's address book there is two entries of Lee. The first Lee appears to be the brother of Elias Chajet, Elias was a long time friend of Barnard Barker for ten years, and is introduced to Frank Sturgis by my father, the first Lee was in the hospital for having what my father called "blood sickness" when he meant leukemia.
The second Lee appears above the name of Frank Fernnie aka Fiorini aka Sturgis. William Pawley then enters the picture. My father quotes Pawley saying "spending my money on getting rid of Kennedy was my best investment".
Wasn't Pawley working with Morales?
My father enters the United States on January 1960, and devotes his life to the arm services. My father is given a French Visa, then almost immediately gets involved with stealing government property, fuel and two M-2 carbines from a government vehicle during "Operation Willow Freeze" in Alaska 1961.
Those guns were never recovered by the government.
Between 1962 and 69 my father travels to Miami, Connecticut, Alaska and back to Miami.
However, there's a cable dated August 16, 1974 regarding FBI Security Supervisor from Dallas contacting a Security Supervisor in Miami about my father.
Apparently, the FBI was investigating my father, and it wasn't for impersonating an officer of the United States, he was already under investigation since 1971 for that charge.
As far as I know, my father never visited any military bases in Dallas.
This investigation would require a subpoena and three months effort to "obtain desired info". What info? Subpoena who?
Is my father confessing as to who the players involved in the Big Event were? Did my father feel somewhat guilty when he says, Five of the six men involved in Watergate were from the Bay of Pigs. 6 out of 6 from Miami. All involved at one time or another with Cuba and her problems.
I know my father was not involved in the Bay of Pigs, but he was recruited by Frank Sturgis as the sixth burglar in Watergate.
My father, Lee, perhaps, (Oswald), the Navarro brothers and Frank Sturgis all knew each other prior to 1963.
Later, my father orders a hit on Navarro for "treason", and says the U.S. government wants him assassinated. Navarro narrowly escapes while alluding two gunmen at his house.
Both Navarro brother's would later be killed in a car accident.
You have to ask yourself, whose story sounds more plausible? Courtroom drama, a deathbed confession, Seymour Weitzman, a Dallas police officer who identifies Barnard Barker, Jim Rothstein who arrest Sturgis for an attempt to commit harm to Mrs. Lorenz, Rudy Junco who says he drove my father to the CIA Headquarters or Edwin Kaiser's questionable evidence?
Or, all above?
Perhaps, the better question is whose name keeps popping up over and over again.
When Scott Kaiser receives the tapes from Howard Liebengood he'll play ALL the tapes to have a better understanding of our lost history events in order to see who's telling the truth.