Proof Kennedy's fatal shot came from the front!

[Tracy Riddle]

The two most significant events in moving the country's understanding toward a conspiracy, were the Good Night America Z film showing, and the Stone film. It would take another event on that scale to move us again. Scientific evidence can be easily refuted by other "expert" witnesses, in the court of public opinion, as well as in court.

Actually, the first wave of skepticism was in 1966-68, when a barrage of books (Lane, Meagher, Weisberg, Thompson, Epstein, etc) came out and sold pretty well. That was back when Americans actually read books. The collapse of the Garrison investigation in 1969 caused the subject to become taboo for the next several years. Very few books on the JFK assassination were published between 1969 and 1974. Then the Z-film, Watergate, etc opened the floodgates again.

[Kelly Bartram]

This is not a theory, it's physics, it's facts.

I'm not an expert on the Kennedy assassination, nor am I a writer or anything else. I'm 66 years old, I decided a few years ago because of all the information/disinformation on the internet and in books, that I would try to figure out for my own self what is the most likely scenario to the puzzle of JFK's murder. This is because I'm getting older and I'm not sure if all the truth will come out before I pass. I know there is an author, Sherry Fiester who has a book, Enemy of the Truth. She promotes one shot from the front. She was a CSI and has the training concerning back-spatter and all that. I have the book, but I can't find it this minute. I do know that she states in her book that a head will go toward a bullet. I don't know the scientific explanation for this, but it is fairly easy to understand for people like me. All I want to know is the truth. If Oswald did it alone, okay, but there is more evidence he had help. Anyway, I think the bullet came from the front. Kennedy's head first moved a few inches or so toward the front. This was to receive the bullet. Then after the butler entered, blood and fluid exited the wound in the front up near the forehead. This is what we see in the Zapruder film. Then the head gave way to the fractures the bullet caused. It is so clear to me as an ordinary, unscientific person that the wound was in the front. I'm open to being wrong, but I don't think I am. I've looked into all this for a long long time.

[Scott Kaiser]

My apologizes, but, there will be no other expert to refute, challenge, discredit or prove this study is incorrect.

This post is only directed to those who believe Oswald acted alone, everyone else, please do not take any offense, as I am having to deal with several of them at DVP forum. Thank you for your understanding.

I call this "From lonenuts to Numbnuts" what's the difference?

I don't run, I don't go back and fourth needing to "change my mind" whether or not Oswald acted alone. When you numbnuts, sorry, lonenuts, have absolutely no proof Oswald fired the fatal shot.

Here's where I come in and explain it to you boys.

Have any of you taken any math in school? Do you know what transferring energy by velocity means? Do you numbnuts understand the word "physics"?

Can you comprehend motion upon impact? Do you know what the definition of Neurology is? It is a physician specializing in neurology and trained to investigate, disorders, reflexes, and sensation.

There are also many non-medical doctors, those with PhD degrees in subjects such as biology and chemistry, who study and research the nervous system, who can identify how Kennedy's right arm clearly moves towards an upwards position at the point of impact in Zfilm indicting a shot came from somewhere other then the rear.

In-fact, because of the nervous systems reaction upon impact, a Neurologist can explain in detail, how the projectile forced Kennedy's body movement and how it reacted upon impact, and the thickness of Kennedy's skin, and layers of tissue beneath the skin blew off the front of his head upon impact.

When you are fully, and completely ready to challenge me, you better be prepared to do your homework, and not just bring to the table nothing but insults, and uncomprehensive, frivolous, jejune, unsophisticated games you numbnuts enjoy playing.

[Scott Kaiser]

^^Edited for proper translation.

[Gordon Gray]

The two most significant events in moving the country's understanding toward a conspiracy, were the Good Night America Z film showing, and the Stone film. It would take another event on that scale to move us again. Scientific evidence can be easily refuted by other "expert" witnesses, in the court of public opinion, as well as in court.

Actually, the first wave of skepticism was in 1966-68, when a barrage of books (Lane, Meagher, Weisberg, Thompson, Epstein, etc) came out and sold pretty well. That was back when Americans actually read books. The collapse of the Garrison investigation in 1969 caused the subject to become taboo for the next several years. Very few books on the JFK assassination were published between 1969 and 1974. Then the Z-film, Watergate, etc opened the floodgates again.

Some Americans still read books, but Dulles was basically right most did not. Mainstream public opinion was influenced mostly by those two events IMO.

[Gordon Gray]

This is not a theory, it's physics, it's facts.

I'm not an expert on the Kennedy assassination, nor am I a writer or anything else. I'm 66 years old, I decided a few years ago because of all the information/disinformation on the internet and in books, that I would try to figure out for my own self what is the most likely scenario to the puzzle of JFK's murder. This is because I'm getting older and I'm not sure if all the truth will come out before I pass. I know there is an author, Sherry Fiester who has a book, Enemy of the Truth. She promotes one shot from the front. She was a CSI and has the training concerning back-spatter and all that. I have the book, but I can't find it this minute. I do know that she states in her book that a head will go toward a bullet. I don't know the scientific explanation for this, but it is fairly easy to understand for people like me. All I want to know is the truth. If Oswald did it alone, okay, but there is more evidence he had help. Anyway, I think the bullet came from the front. Kennedy's head first moved a few inches or so toward the front. This was to receive the bullet. Then after the butler entered, blood and fluid exited the wound in the front up near the forehead. This is what we see in the Zapruder film. Then the head gave way to the fractures the bullet caused. It is so clear to me as an ordinary, unscientific person that the wound was in the front. I'm open to being wrong, but I don't think I am. I've looked into all this for a long long time.

I was just going to post the same thing. I'm currently reading Sherry Fiester's book. This strikes me as the best scientific explanation of a frontal shot. However if the back spatter on the Z film is real what happened to the front spatter that should be more apparent. We know it happened because the motorcyclists and the follow up car were struck by it, but it doesn't show up on the Z film.

[Scott Kaiser]

This is not a theory, it's physics, it's facts.

I'm not an expert on the Kennedy assassination, nor am I a writer or anything else. I'm 66 years old, I decided a few years ago because of all the information/disinformation on the internet and in books, that I would try to figure out for my own self what is the most likely scenario to the puzzle of JFK's murder. This is because I'm getting older and I'm not sure if all the truth will come out before I pass. I know there is an author, Sherry Fiester who has a book, Enemy of the Truth. She promotes one shot from the front. She was a CSI and has the training concerning back-spatter and all that. I have the book, but I can't find it this minute. I do know that she states in her book that a head will go toward a bullet. I don't know the scientific explanation for this, but it is fairly easy to understand for people like me. All I want to know is the truth. If Oswald did it alone, okay, but there is more evidence he had help. Anyway, I think the bullet came from the front. Kennedy's head first moved a few inches or so toward the front. This was to receive the bullet. Then after the butler entered, blood and fluid exited the wound in the front up near the forehead. This is what we see in the Zapruder film. Then the head gave way to the fractures the bullet caused. It is so clear to me as an ordinary, unscientific person that the wound was in the front. I'm open to being wrong, but I don't think I am. I've looked into all this for a long long time.

I was just going to post the same thing. I'm currently reading Sherry Fiester's book. This strikes me as the best scientific explanation of a frontal shot. However if the back spatter on the Z film is real what happened to the front spatter that should be more apparent. We know it happened because the motorcyclists and the follow up car were struck by it, but it doesn't show up on the Z film.

Gordon, what if I told you that you don't need a book in order for you to be absolutely positive that a shot came from somewhere else other then the rear, now, I'm not saying don't buy Sherry's book, in-fact, I encourage everyone to buy her book, she can explain the science of blood splatter, which is very important when it comes to a crime scene.

But, what if I said, you don't need to buy my book to get it, you don't just need to understand the science of blood spatter, but, what if I said to you.

Anyone can try a simple experiment right where you are, right now, if I were to show what to do, and you did it, then, would it convince you, that the shot came from somewhere else other then the rear?

And, if it could even convince the worlds biggest skeptic, then how could it be disputed?

[Gordon Gray]

This is not a theory, it's physics, it's facts.

I'm not an expert on the Kennedy assassination, nor am I a writer or anything else. I'm 66 years old, I decided a few years ago because of all the information/disinformation on the internet and in books, that I would try to figure out for my own self what is the most likely scenario to the puzzle of JFK's murder. This is because I'm getting older and I'm not sure if all the truth will come out before I pass. I know there is an author, Sherry Fiester who has a book, Enemy of the Truth. She promotes one shot from the front. She was a CSI and has the training concerning back-spatter and all that. I have the book, but I can't find it this minute. I do know that she states in her book that a head will go toward a bullet. I don't know the scientific explanation for this, but it is fairly easy to understand for people like me. All I want to know is the truth. If Oswald did it alone, okay, but there is more evidence he had help. Anyway, I think the bullet came from the front. Kennedy's head first moved a few inches or so toward the front. This was to receive the bullet. Then after the butler entered, blood and fluid exited the wound in the front up near the forehead. This is what we see in the Zapruder film. Then the head gave way to the fractures the bullet caused. It is so clear to me as an ordinary, unscientific person that the wound was in the front. I'm open to being wrong, but I don't think I am. I've looked into all this for a long long time.

I was just going to post the same thing. I'm currently reading Sherry Fiester's book. This strikes me as the best scientific explanation of a frontal shot. However if the back spatter on the Z film is real what happened to the front spatter that should be more apparent. We know it happened because the motorcyclists and the follow up car were struck by it, but it doesn't show up on the Z film.

Gordon, what if I told you that you don't need a book in order for you to be absolutely positive that a shot came from somewhere else other then the rear, now, I'm not saying don't buy Sherry's book, in-fact, I encourage everyone to buy her book, she can explain the science of blood splatter, which is very important when it comes to a crime scene.

But, what if I said, you don't need to buy my book to get it, you don't just need to understand the science of blood spatter, but, what if I said to you.

Anyone can try a simple experiment right where you are, right now, if I were to show what to do, and you did it, then, would it convince you, that the shot came from somewhere else other then the rear?

And, if it could even convince the worlds biggest skeptic, then how could it be disputed?

I find this post virtually unintelligible so I can't say anything. Except, I wasn't referring to her blood spatter analysis. I was referring to her explanation of the forward head movement Z 312-313, the radiating and concentric fracturing, and the effects of cavitation and transfer of momentum.

[Scott Kaiser]

Scott R Kaiser - Reveals that his father, Edwin Kaiser, was an original Watergate burglar! Scott recently discovered his father's, Edwin Kaiser, long hidden personal papers. In those papers are stories about his friends and Watergate burglars CIA operatives Frank Sturgis, E Howard Hunt (many who believe that they were directly involved with the JFK Assassination). Edwin Kaiser reveals that he once led an Anti-Castro Cuban Exile group in Miami. CIA's Gerry Patrick Hemming, Alpha 66 Antonio Veciana, CIA Miami Station JMWAVE and a host of others are discussed with revelations from Scott in every sentence. This is a must for all interested in JFK and the behind the scenes machinations that were taking place. Subscribe to Night Fright Show for the best shows on JFK, RFK and MLK.

Please click here: https://www.youtube.com/nightfrightshow
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1HwspawIMk

[Scott Kaiser]

Whether or not Oswald was apart of the conspiracy to assassinate Kennedy, is anyones guess, and just after getting shot himself, Oswald kept his mouth shut to the very end to protect his family as my father did.

Or, perhaps, Oswald simply knew something. And, he still kept his mouth shut to the end. The only thing I know for a fact, and yes, I said FACT. Is that the fatal shot that struck Kennedy in the head did not come from the rear, and all it took was a Neurologist to explain it to me, soon, it will all come out.

And the truth shall set me free!