Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Badgeman
#41
Bob Ringler Wrote:Comparing sitzmn to zapruder you can see that siztman is larger than zapruder.

Comparing badgeman to sitzman you can see that sitzman is taller than badgeman.

Also, since the elevation of the betzner camera is higher than the retaining wall, badgemans appears to be taller because his height is relative to the retaining wall.

[Image: sitzman_bman.jpg]


I'm referring to your imaginary Badgeman. Sitzman and Zapruder have nothing to do with this.
You are way of course in your analysis. As I have told you, and as anyone else here will tell you, your imaginary Badgeman is bigger than Blackdogman, and can therefore not be a real person.
JFK Assassination Forum
http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com
Reply
#42
Sitzman has everything to do with this.

Badgeman is actually smaller than siztman!.

Obviously you have no trouble seeing him. He is just as clear as sitzman, actually, in some respects he is clearer than siztman. And his size is completely consistant with sitzmans size.

He is real.
Reply
#43
What are you talking about with this multiple exposure nonsense.
Willis is a single exposure. I think you're just having a laugh, Bob.
JFK Assassination Forum
http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com
Reply
#44
People can see the blur for themsleves. All I have done is resolve the blur for them. I call it "mutliple exposures". That may not be the technical term.
Reply
#45
Bob Ringler Wrote:Sitzman has everything to do with this.

Badgeman is actually smaller than siztman!.

Obviously you have no trouble seeing him. He is just as clear as sitzman, actually, in some respects he is clearer than siztman. And his size is completely consistant with sitzmans size.

He is real.

I dont see anybody. I see the illusion of someone, who because they are behind Blackdogman, and are far larger in size, can not be a human being.
Take the advice or leave it, it's up to you.
JFK Assassination Forum
http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com
Reply
#46
And what deconvolution software did you use to remove the blur?
As the blur is still there, I'm suggesting you didn't use any.
JFK Assassination Forum
http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com
Reply
#47
Sorry, but I cant take your advice. You claim that there is nothing in the following picture. I see what is plainly there, as do many others. The fact that you cannot see it or will not admit to seeing it tells me that the search for the truth is not as important to you as harassing me.

[Image: baby_on_retaining_wall2_black.jpg]
Reply
#48
Our eyes are very good at deconvolution.

When I blacked out the other images that formed the blur I was deconvolving the image.
Reply
#49
Please listen to this video by gil jesus. Badgman is not described as being standing on a car bumper. He appears to be described as being out in the open.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hn1-dy5-Ebs
Reply
#50
I'm not harassing you, and I resent you saying so. I'm trying to help you believe it or not.
If you wish to continue seeing things that are not there, like imaginary Badgemen, Reflections of the Elm street crowd above the fence in Betzner ( Posted Elsewhere ) etc, then so be it.
JFK Assassination Forum
http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)