Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
9/11: The Social Network - Daniel Hopsicker joins the dots
Another solid and well-researched article by Daniel Hopsicker on the criminal networks involved behind 9/11, and the drug traffic trade that always seems to be on the periphery of this event. Also note Hopsicker's oblique mention of a major 9/11 book due out in September this year (he didn't write it, but he assisted with its research) that sounds like it might make some big waves in the mainstream when it appears.
Anthony Thorne Wrote:Another solid and well-researched article by Daniel Hopsicker on the criminal networks involved behind 9/11, and the drug traffic trade that always seems to be on the periphery of this event. Also note Hopsicker's oblique mention of a major 9/11 book due out in September this year (he didn't write it, but he assisted with its research) that sounds like it might make some big waves in the mainstream when it appears.

Great dot connecting...and can't wait for this book!!!!!
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Great dot-joining by Daniel Hopsicker and to be read in its entirety.

Quote:While Mexican drug cartels make $30 billion transporting drugs to the U.S. drug market each year,a highly-placed source tells me, the American drug lords make $120 billion.

It is not a trifle. But it is a misunderstanding.

I'm sure Henry Kissinger can explain.

Just as George W Bush attempted to have Henry deliver the "Kissinger Commission" version of 9/11...
"It means this War was never political at all, the politics was all theatre, all just to keep the people distracted...."
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War."

Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon

"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta."
The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war
A thing of frightening beauty. Great connecting there. I'm looking forward to reading his new book.
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx

"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.

“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
Agreed about the dot-connecting but.....

But before Hopsiker is duly cannonised, have a look at this article. It puts him in a rather less flattering light, with detailed, well reasoned research.


Maybe, but I remain agnostic on a guy who presents himself as the standard-bearer of the Gary Webb legacy and - were an Official Narrative fall-back position to become necessary - whose over-arching thesis on 911 would fit the bill
Peter Presland

".....there is something far worse than Nazism, and that is the hubris of the Anglo-American fraternities, whose routine is to incite indigenous monsters to war, and steer the pandemonium to further their imperial aims"
Guido Preparata. Preface to 'Conjuring Hitler'[size=12][size=12]
"Never believe anything until it has been officially denied"
Claud Cockburn

Always good to be cautious, but I don't quite buy the thesis of the article Peter links above, nor do I really find it that well researched.

"At this very moment in time they are getting him ready for the major talk show circuit. They are grooming him as the atom bomb to destroy the 911 truth movement.."

Hopsicker wishes he had this much attention. Sander Hicks' THE BIG WEDDING has a chapter on Hopsicker which notes how DH, in an attempt to get airtime for some of his drug traffic expose videos, appeared on camera onetime in interview with another figure who was later linked (loosely, indirectly, I forget all the details) to unsavory right-wing racist groups. Hicks states right away that he doesn't feel that Hopsicker shares any of those aforementioned racist viewpoints, but that he made a clear error of judgement (or failed to properly research his interviewee) by appearing with the chap on camera. When questioned about the incident, Hopsicker argued with some frustration (if I recall the chapter accurately) that it was hard enough to get any airtime anywhere. (I could be misremembering the section in THE BIG WEDDING but I recall this is a fairly accurate paraphrase of it). Anyway, this is hardly the act of someone carefully grooming themselves in preparation for appearances on mainstream TV.

Citizen Spook Blog then quotes a prior article by Hopsicker and critiques it for not being aggressive enough regarding the likelihood of direct US government involvement in the attacks. Hopsicker's article is dated as November 7th 2001, barely a handful of weeks after the attacks themselves. I date the first 9/11 truth book as probably being Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed's THE WAR ON FREEDOM from 2002 (later revised by that author into THE WAR ON TRUTH), the first Western mainstream media questioning of the event being Barrie Zwicker's late 2001 / early 2002 analysis in Canada, and the first major articles seriously digging in to the inconsistencies surrounding the attacks being those by Michael Ruppert and Stan Goff through early 2002 onwards. (Ruppert's OH LUCY! YOU GOTTA LOTTA 'SPLAININ TO DO. A TIMELINE SURROUNDING SEPTEMBER 11TH' is probably the most notable of those). German author Mathias Broeckers was questioning the event nearly immediately after the attack but his articles didn't appear in English translation until 2006. The sporadically brilliant Xymphora blog managed four or more years solid of important 9/11 analysis (before drifting perhaps too heavily into aggressively anti-Zionist polemics) but even that blog didn't get all its ducks in a row regarding 9/11 until probably the turn of 2001 / 2002. Hopsicker's failure to completely dive into all the inconsistencies of the 9/11 story since then is worthy of comment, but I'm prepared to cut him some slack regarding an article written less than eight weeks after the event. Sibel Edmonds and Coleen Rowley, to name two of many, have been equally careful about pointing direct fingers but their own critiques remain of great merit. To date, I think Webster Tarpley has appeared on mainstream US TV more often than Daniel Hopsicker.

Hicks accurately notes Hopsicker as being the point man in establishing Atta and his cohorts as being lovers of pork chops and devotees of drugs and strip clubs, not really behavior typical of radical muslims preparing for holy suicide. In the Hicks book, asshole 9/11 Commission member Richard Ben Veniste reacts with dismay and snide anger when Hicks mentions both Barry Seal and the above Atta facts in an interview. Anyone that gets under the skin of creeps like Ben Veniste deserves some credit, and Hopsicker deserves recognition for keeping those facts in the public spotlight, even if only to a minor extent.

As an aside, though I haven't finished listening to the whole thing, there's a pretty good (and long) interview between Alex Jones and Hopsicker here -

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Saudi Funding Of Network Nailed Down Further Peter Lemkin 13 7,179 10-01-2014, 03:47 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Social Psychological Implications ... Ed Jewett 6 5,220 06-05-2010, 05:30 PM
Last Post: Ed Jewett
  "The super-classified network that served as command and control for the 9/11 false flag attack on A Ed Jewett 2 3,022 01-05-2010, 04:57 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Gordon duff: 9/11 planners confess on network tv Ed Jewett 0 2,312 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:
  Hopsicker stays on the trail.. Anthony Thorne 0 1,650 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:
  Where did the bodies go? 3,000 "deaths" from 9/11 not in Social Security death index James H. Fetzer 0 6,160 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:
  Disconnecting the Dots - New Book on 911 - By Fenton Peter Lemkin 0 1,758 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:
  The super-classified command and control network for the 9/11 false flag attack on America Ed Jewett 0 2,258 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:
  William Pepper Joins The Legal Fight For 911-Truth! Peter Lemkin 0 3,629 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:
  Two new articles - Hopsicker and Hicks on Jeb Bush and the 9/11 cover-up Anthony Thorne 0 14,967 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)