The LBJ-Did-It Operation Continues to Unfold

[Bill Kelly]

Talk about an impossible mission!

Yet it may be all too possible ...

Over at the Disinformation Bazaar known as the Education Forum, a certain "Jim Phelps" (what, "Dan Briggs" was taken?) appears as the latest tout to be assigned to the LBJ-as-Prime-Mover operation.

The title of "Phelps'" newest thread there:

"A Zionist Shoots his way into the Cat Bird Seat: Just about everyone knows LBJ was the top Conspirator"

To buttress "his" argument, "Phelps" drags out the wholly discredited Regicide, by the wholly discredited Gregory Douglas.

"Phelps" also is prone to lengthy, multiple part posts -- another tactic used by disinformers to confuse and misdirect.

And it gets better. Currently "he's" engaged in a three-way with Robert Morrow and "Len Colby."

They take each other so seriously and treat each other with such respect ... paradigms of academic discourse, one and all.

And we are left to marvel at the fatal naïveté displayed by those who, ostensibly in deference to a standard of decorum, allow the disinformation and other forms of enemy action to continue unabated and unrecognized for what they truly are.

Sorry Charles, this is what I was responding to.

BK

[Bernice Moore]

if not related please move..from this thread...txs b

http://www.creators.com/opinion/alexande...r-inc.html

[Vasilios Vazakas]

Israel is not the sponsor of the assassination and the majority of us we are on agreement. They might have been used at the facilitator or operational level but we don't have the evidence. Talking of Final Judgement that book shares on thing in common with Perfect cover. I don't imply that they are of the same value, you do know my opinion reagrding Final Judgement. However they both mention a simulated attack/fake attempt in Dealey Plaza. Any thoughts on this scenario?

The sine qua non for effective disinformation is the inclusion of verifiable data in its midst. The more revelatory in nature that data is, the more persuasive the disinformation will be.

The simulated attack hypothesis is sound, profoundly underappreciated, and ultimately essential to the process of understanding the structure of the final attack scenario. Piper was NOT the first to postulate it; George Michael Evica early on had argued for just such a component in the prime Facilitators' attack meta-structure.

Back in the early 1990s my own relatively primitive thinking about the assassination produced just such a scenario. I had neither the standing nor the chutzpah to argue for it publicly.

George Michael had both.

(The Evica simulated attack hypothesis directly gave birth to Vince Palamara's "Third Alternative" work -- the title of which was taken directly from and with the permission of George Michael, who generously helped direct Vince's thinking along these lines.)

Nothing that I've learned since has moved me off this position. Much that I've learned has helped sustain and evolve my original thinking.

The deeply layered Dallas structure, in all its nuance, leads me to conclude that no other similar scenario could have been run simultaneously -- including the Chicago "plot".

Finally: To categorize "Israel" as a False Sponsor is NOT to absolve Israeli interests from participation in the assassination at many levels of Facilitation -- including very high levels indeed.

Unfortunately Dr. Evica did not explain in detail what he meant by simulated attack and if he had any sources or indications when he mentioned it in his fine essay Perfect Cover. Vince Palamara discussed the security stripping but not a simulated attack. I think he has now changed his mind and he does not believe in the security tests by the SS anymore.
you said above that "To categorize "Israel" as a False Sponsor is NOT to absolve Israeli interests from participation in the assassination at many levels of Facilitation -- including very high levels indeed". Do you mean Tibor Rosenbaum and the Lansky syndicate?

[Charles Drago]

I wrote, "To categorize 'Israel' as a False Sponsor is NOT to absolve Israeli interests from participation in the assassination at many levels of Facilitation -- including very high levels indeed."

I might have added, "Nor is it to implicate Israeli interests at any level of the conspiracy."