Posts: 5,374
Threads: 149
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2010
Once again, Cinque moronically fails to realize Lovelady is east of the ceiling lamp in the doorway according to the correctly applied angle of perspective from Altgen's vantage point.
Lovelady is holding on to the center railing with his left hand bringing his arm and shoulder down into a dropped position as Weigman shows.
Cinque once again publicly shows he has no basic grasp whatsoever of photo analysis.
If Cinque had any ability, which he does not, he would see that the best indicator is the aluminum door frame behind Lovelady. This frame is divided into 3 parts and Lovelady is clearly framed in the 3rd most eastward section.
Posts: 5,374
Threads: 149
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2010
Those EF guys aren't as sharp as they credit themselves. Cinque has left himself wide open. He says the overhead lamp in the doorway shows Lovelady was on the west side of the portal, however if you look at the three-part aluminum frame in the Depository entrance Lovelady is squarely standing in the eastern-most aluminum frame. This completely disproves Cinque's claim yet none of the self-described experts on EF have pointed it out. Once again, because Cinque lacks a basic competent understanding of perspective he fails to understand that the overhead lamp is forward in the entrance throwing off its apparent location.
Posts: 3,965
Threads: 211
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2008
Three observations:
1. One is left to wonder if the application of the late Tom Wilson's controversial, to date non-falsifiable photo analysis technology to studies of Altgens 6 would resolve alteration and identification issues.
2. QUESTION: "In Altgens 6, is that LHO in the doorway, or is the photograph unaltered?"
MY (TENTATIVE) ANSWER: "No."
3. Our perceptions of Altgens 6 clearly and intentionally are being altered.
Posts: 5,374
Threads: 149
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2010
04-06-2012, 03:25 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-06-2012, 03:52 PM by Albert Doyle.)
The EF brain trust praises Sean Murphy's observations but fails to realize Prayer Man is obviously much shorter in height than Lovelady which automatically excludes him as Oswald. These are the "great points" Don cites and gives credit to for equal opinion.
The picture of "Prayer Man" shows the crowd facing the Depository steps. At that point if Prayer Man was Oswald they would have seen him standing right there. Plus his still being on the steps after the shooting gives him less time to run back to the 2nd floor.
Posts: 3,905
Threads: 200
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2008
Charles Drago Wrote:Three observations:
1. One is left to wonder if the application of the late Tom Wilson's controversial, to date non-falsifiable photo analysis technology to studies of Altgens 6 would resolve alteration and identification issues.
2. QUESTION: "In Altgens 6, is that LHO in the doorway, or is the photograph unaltered?"
MY (TENTATIVE) ANSWER: "No."
3. Our perceptions of Altgens 6 clearly and intentionally are being altered.
There was no time to alter, from what I have seen/read.
3-- agreed, totally. And intentionally. To what end? To keep peoples' minds off more significant matter is what I believe.
Dawn
Posts: 904
Threads: 6
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Feb 2011
Even if proved, which to me is very unlikely, that Billy Nolan Lovelady was not in the doorway at the time of the Altgens photograph taken as the John Fitzgerald Kennedy murder was being executed, that would not place the person identified as Lee Harvey Oswald in the TSBD building doorway at 12:30 pm CST on 11/22/1963. And, after well over 30 years of somewhat dedicated study of the research of the John Fitzgerald Kennedy assassination, I just don't believe there is any evidence forthcoming that will put, in my mind, the person that has been identified as Lee Harvey Oswald, in the 6th floor southeast corner window known as the snipers perch with a Mannlicher-Carcano rifle shooting at the President. What I am fairly certain of, is that at least during November, 1963, there appears to be multiple choices of persons that could be identified as Lee Harvey Oswald in the Dallas, Texas area. That being said, although I don't believe it to be the case, it would appear possible for someone other than Lee Harvey Oswald to have been mistaken for Billy Nolan Lovelady. But to me, at 12:30 pm CST on 11/22/'63, Billy Nolan Lovelady was in, as pictured in the Altgens photograph, the doorway and on the porch/landing of the TSBD building. And, the person known as Lee Harvey Oswald was either on the 1st or 2nd floor, inside the building, for his lunch break as the assassination occurred.
Larry
StudentofAssassinationResearch
Posts: 5,374
Threads: 149
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2010
It was definitely Lovelady there's no doubt about it.
What's interesting to me is that Prayer Man could be Buell Frazier. Considering how deep he might be into the conspiracy it's very interesting that he actually could be praying.
Posts: 19
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
The idea that conspirators, within minutes of the assassination, and with the patsy (LHO) set-up in advance, discover a photo of Oswald
on the steps of the TSBD as JFK is wounded and don't make that photo disappear (altering it with a Oswald lookalike instead - ala Fetzer's
mobile alteratation lab) is a proposition constructed for reasons other than convincing readers of it's veracity.
A deliberate diversion, IMO.
Too often we... enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.
John F. Kennedy
Posts: 906
Threads: 67
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: May 2010
Gary Craig Wrote:The idea that conspirators, within minutes of the assassination, and with the patsy (LHO) set-up in advance, discover a photo of Oswald
on the steps of the TSBD as JFK is wounded and don't make that photo disappear (altering it with a Oswald lookalike instead - ala Fetzer's
mobile alteratation lab) is a proposition constructed for reasons other than convincing readers of it's veracity.
A deliberate diversion, IMO.
Gary,
You are spot on in your evaluation.
GO_SECURE
monk
"It is difficult to abolish prejudice in those bereft of ideas. The more hatred is superficial, the more it runs deep."
James Hepburn -- Farewell America (1968)
Posts: 3,965
Threads: 211
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2008
I second that opinion, Greg.
What we are dealing with here is enemy action.
|