From Vince Salandria to Phillip Nelson: Descent into the Maelstrom

[Vasilios Vazakas]

Vince Salandria's work beautifully explains who the false sponsors were and why they wee chosen to fulfil this designated role. He explains how the far right, LBJ, the Left, the Liberals, Cuba-Russia, the FBI, the Military were all framed in such a way as to allow the true instigators to escape notice. The next time they tell you that LBJ and Hoover did, or Fred Korth and General Cabell did, the Mafia did it, you should refer them to Salandria to prove how wrong they are and ask them why they try to mislead us. It is a surprise that we have allowed these people to waste our time and brain matter. To borrow Richard Helms' words,I am amazed that we did.

[Stan Wilbourne]

http://home.comcast.net/~johnkelin/vs.html

http://home.comcast.net/~johnkelin/schotz.html

Thanks, John, for posting those links.

Please do not seek comfort in the probability that the killing of President Kennedy was the work of a low-level conspiracy. Chief Justice Warren, Allen Dulles, McGeorge Bundy, all of the other government operatives, the U.S. media, the U.S. historians, would not have failed to perform the work which we have just performed in order to protect the Mafia or some small group not associated with the center of U.S. power. If the killers had not been in the very center of the National Security State and therefore beyond reach of punishment, the President's family, having considerable wealth and power, would have insisted upon a fair investigation and punishment of the conspirators. Our government at this time would not have its very legitimacy at issue throughout the world in order to protect rogue elements who had committed this crime thirty-five years ago.

There is no rational manner in which we can strip away the guilt of the highest levels of our national security state. The government's consistent criminal pattern of ignoring a whole series of data indicating conspiracy and consistently twisting the meaning of evidence to support a single assassin killing compels the conclusion that the U.S. national security state killed President Kennedy. President Kennedy himself had posited that he might be killed by the national security state, as reported in Paul B. Fay, Jr.'s book, The Pleasure of his Company.

And, I found this quote from David Talbot on the EF forum:

As I got deeper into my research, the air of sinister menace that hung over the Kennedy presidency was palpable to me. I simply can't understand how other Kennedy biographers and historians have missed this. As I've been saying in my talks on the book tour circuit, it was Rome on the Potomac. Some of this comes across in Richard Reeves' book on Kennedy, as well as Beschloss's book on JFK and Khrushchev -- but they stop short of the obvious conclusion. It was indeed an administration at war with itself.

One of the most chilling things I heard in my interviews for the book was from Arthur Schlesinger, when I asked him if Kennedy was in full control of his own government. Well, he told me, we certainly were not in control of the Joint Chiefs.