21-05-2012, 08:34 PM
It is not my job, role or interest to convince you or anyone of anything. Like the experts you believe in such as the very wrong David Chandler who is not a physicists and does not have a degree in Physics but is a high school physics teacher you look to as physics expert, I present information and in this case a book by Tom about the observations of the collapses of all three towers.
What he shows is that the observables do no show controlled demolition. PERIOD. He does not speculate on what initiated the gravity driven collapses. On the other hand he also sees no evidence of explosives of incendiares either. You can't prove or disprove something you can't see or generate data from.
But we are close to understand how and where the initiation likely was. Note the word LIKELY. That's because from a physics and engineering perspective if you break the frame at those likely locations... it produces the observables we have from that day.
I can assure you that if someone wanted to demolish those towers... they would have planned it by studying the structure and attacking it with the least effort and the most reliable approach. Oh I forgot...they were staging a show and so it had to appear as it was from plane strikes and office fires.. so not extremely loud explosions and no blown apart steel frames and the usual evidence of massive explosions of structures... no no no... this has to be a high tech job that LOOKS like a collapse... makes no explosive noise.. leaves no exploded steel or any evidence of explosives. Right Lauren... what was the evidence that convinced you.
If you look to the OCT or JREF you will find the same quality of rubbish that the truth movement *researchers* have presented. By the way one of the truth movement published researches, Gordon Ross PE has withdrawn from the truth movement because their is willful ignorance and lots of armchair experts who know boo. He's also agreed with my work.
Who are the reseachers who you think have done excellent work?
David Chandler - mis applies thermodynamics
Jonathan Cole - admitted to me in email that he forget about Euler Buckling
Steven Jones - lied about the diagonal cut column
Jim Hoffman - claims that the ceiling tiles were painted with nano thermite on 100 floors???
Niels Harrit - organic chemist retired who discusses thermo dynamics and physics as if he knows what he's talking about
Ignorance is bliss... that's why it's so common.
What he shows is that the observables do no show controlled demolition. PERIOD. He does not speculate on what initiated the gravity driven collapses. On the other hand he also sees no evidence of explosives of incendiares either. You can't prove or disprove something you can't see or generate data from.
But we are close to understand how and where the initiation likely was. Note the word LIKELY. That's because from a physics and engineering perspective if you break the frame at those likely locations... it produces the observables we have from that day.
I can assure you that if someone wanted to demolish those towers... they would have planned it by studying the structure and attacking it with the least effort and the most reliable approach. Oh I forgot...they were staging a show and so it had to appear as it was from plane strikes and office fires.. so not extremely loud explosions and no blown apart steel frames and the usual evidence of massive explosions of structures... no no no... this has to be a high tech job that LOOKS like a collapse... makes no explosive noise.. leaves no exploded steel or any evidence of explosives. Right Lauren... what was the evidence that convinced you.
If you look to the OCT or JREF you will find the same quality of rubbish that the truth movement *researchers* have presented. By the way one of the truth movement published researches, Gordon Ross PE has withdrawn from the truth movement because their is willful ignorance and lots of armchair experts who know boo. He's also agreed with my work.
Who are the reseachers who you think have done excellent work?
David Chandler - mis applies thermodynamics
Jonathan Cole - admitted to me in email that he forget about Euler Buckling
Steven Jones - lied about the diagonal cut column
Jim Hoffman - claims that the ceiling tiles were painted with nano thermite on 100 floors???
Niels Harrit - organic chemist retired who discusses thermo dynamics and physics as if he knows what he's talking about
Ignorance is bliss... that's why it's so common.