Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Michael Piper and Final Judgment
Mark Stapleton Wrote:
David Josephs Wrote:The following is the only mention of a statement allegedly heard by one Thomas Mosley:

Informant 2-1-266 heard (Mark, from who did he hear this?)
that Mosley was ALLEGEDLY negotiating to sell guns to Homer
and (ALSO HEARD - from who?) that Homer ALLEGEDLY made a comment on the 21st of Nov about "new Jewish backers"...

To recap...

2-1-266 HEARD these things... from some UNNAMED THIRD PARTY
that Mosley was ALLEGEDLY negotiating with Homer

AND THAT
Homer ALLEGEDLY made a comment about JFK on the 21st.

We have no idea WHO he HEARD it from
or whether it was actually ever SAID by Homer in the first place...

AGAIN: He (2-1-266) said, that he heard that some guy was trying to sell guns to this other guy who ALLEGEDLY made this comment...

Your turn Mark... have you even bothered to read the REST of the report about Mosley and Homer and Mannie? Piper obviously didn't... he stopped at "new Jew Backers"
and called it a done deal...

btw - what do you think Sierra has to do with this? as that's a name you've never even bothered to include in your SUPPORTING EVIDENCE

You think Piper's whole book revolves around this?

What about JFK's secret war with Israel concerning Dimona.
Ruby's arms smuggling to Israel. Ruby's connection to Lansky, Cohen, Gruber and the the rest of the Kosher Nostra.

Lansky's crime syndicate and connections to Permindex. The sudden pro-Israel policy shifts after Kennedy's death. LBJ's undying loyalty to Israel. Angleton, who helped establish Mossad, and his role in the conspiracy and coverup. The control over the motorcade route and the DPD exercised by the Dallas Citizens Committee, chaired by ardent Zionists Scheppes and Bloom. The Zionist control over the US and western media.

Piper's book is much more than the single incident you describe. It doesn't hinge only on this. That's a ridiculous assumption.

Then why not pick one from this list and PROVE IT.... These are all "PIPER FACTS" Statements made without supporting proof or documentation.

Take the "secret war of JFK/BG" POINT TO THE PAGES IN THE BOOK THAT SUPPORT AND IDENTIFY THIS "WAR" AND I WILL POST THEM....

SIMPLE.

Otherwise Mark... you just sound like a bigot... a whiny child of a bigot without the ability to reason or defend one's hatred.
Is that the bottom line here Mark...? it's ok for any and all other races and religions to expand and control, kill and rule... shall we talk about Cathollic Church thru the ages?

Without proof - you're no better than the mumbling fool on the corner, swinging a cat over his head and screaming about the end of the world cause the mayans said so...
Amazing to look at for a second or two but mostly just pathetic.

Are you THAT AFRAID to open the book and FIND the supporting sources and references... or lazy?
Eric Hoffer is in the driveway and I've miles to go before I sleep--

--but I couldn't help but notice one of the True Believer(s) (1951) sounding off at 895:

Go and live your life you clown--I'm not stopping you.

We couldn't have said it better.
I can't find the materials on stormfront. (Piper's JFK book)

It is like holding my breath just being there, but I couldn't find it on Stormfront.

Wikispooks has it. No breath-holding required...

Link below:

http://wikispooks.com/wiki/File:Final_Judgment.pdf

I did read it years ago in a scan read mode.
Many reviews ripped the premise and after returning it to the library,
I agree with the majority of the reviews by longtime JFK researchers.
It is next to useless. Akin to "Case Closed" in manner.

Read it for yourself, but my opinion was set long ago.

Now back to 1910 or so and AWDulles and like bastards.
The original direction of this thread is the creation of Nazism and the consequences on our lives today of taking the Nazi Asp into our home - America, including "paperclip" and people like Gehlen and Von Bolschwing.

Not MCPiper as interjected here.
Nuff Said 'bout him and his here abouts.

Jim
Read not to contradict and confute;
nor to believe and take for granted;
nor to find talk and discourse;
but to weigh and consider.
FRANCIS BACON


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Michael LeFlem reviews Pieces of the Puzzle Jim DiEugenio 2 3,087 26-01-2019, 08:06 AM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  The Skorzeny Papers by Michael LeFlem Jim DiEugenio 4 5,497 22-10-2018, 03:21 AM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  Final chain link Harry Dean 7 22,633 20-07-2018, 10:52 PM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  Michael LaFLem on C. D. Jackson biography Jim DiEugenio 1 3,026 13-02-2018, 09:12 PM
Last Post: Alan Ford
  Michael Baden's Deceptions by Mili Cranor Jim DiEugenio 0 3,832 13-09-2017, 01:51 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  Michael Best Archive R.K. Locke 1 2,735 22-08-2016, 11:44 PM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Michael Collins Piper Albert Doyle 49 12,502 03-10-2015, 06:30 PM
Last Post: Dawn Meredith
  Michael Baden isn't sure about Michael Brown's wounds Tracy Riddle 2 3,192 18-08-2014, 05:33 PM
Last Post: Tracy Riddle
  **OFFICIAL FINAL VERSION ** (NOT a satire!) Jim Hargrove 3 3,536 28-12-2013, 05:28 PM
Last Post: Marc Ellis
  "50 Reasons for 50 Years" Internet Series of Len Osanic (final segment) James Norwood 3 4,800 11-12-2013, 05:06 PM
Last Post: Marc Ellis

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)