| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 5 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 1 Guest(s) Applebot, Baidu, Bing, Google
|
| Latest Threads |
Assassination of Charlie ...
Forum: Players, organisations, and events of deep politics
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
04-12-2025, 01:14 AM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 2,682
|
The Dutroux & Nebula file...
Forum: Institute for the Study of Globalization and Covert Politics (ISGP)
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
24-11-2025, 06:09 AM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 111,175
|
Artistic MK Ultra Agents
Forum: Organizations and Cults
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
04-10-2025, 07:35 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 255
|
Audio of the FBI Wiretaps...
Forum: JFK Assassination
Last Post: Brian Doyle
30-09-2025, 07:55 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 667
|
Descent Into Madness
Forum: Political, Governmental, and Economic Systems and Strategies
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
18-09-2025, 04:00 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 1,739
|
Genocide in Gaza - and th...
Forum: Historical Events
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
06-09-2025, 05:43 PM
» Replies: 10
» Views: 5,563
|
Who Was Epstein? Where di...
Forum: Players, organisations, and events of deep politics
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
05-09-2025, 06:07 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 3,491
|
Ruth Paine Dead
Forum: JFK Assassination
Last Post: Brian Doyle
03-09-2025, 04:15 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 3,370
|
Forum Access
Forum: Forum Technical Issues
Last Post: Magda Hassan
23-08-2025, 04:15 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 3,543
|
Film on QAnon - what it r...
Forum: Players, organisations, and events of deep politics
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
10-08-2025, 08:01 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 3,087
|
|
|
| Interview: "Franklin Scandal" Author Nick Bryant w/ Steven Davis discuss Trafficking |
|
Posted by: George Williams - 14-03-2025, 07:48 PM - Forum: Books
- No Replies
|
 |
PLEASE WATCH and SHARE!!
(1/26/24) Sat down for a really great interview with Nick Bryant, author of the very very important book "The Franklin Scandal: A Story of Powerbrokers, Child Abuse & Betrayal," a comprehensive book about the "Franklin" child sex trafficking scandal of the '80s.
In this interview, Nick and I discuss my own journalism under my online pen name "Surviveandheal15", and discuss my investigation into human trafficking crimes in Haiti. In particular, we focus on discussing the extremely suspicious death of University of Denver Human Trafficking Researcher Monica Petersen, the Laura Silsby child trafficking scandal that also erupted in Haiti back in 2010, as well as my personal trip to Haiti in 2022 to investigate human trafficking crimes.
Hope the interview is informative. Please STAY SAFE everyone, take care! -Steve
|
|
|
| The Hypocritical Fraud Jim DiEugenio |
|
Posted by: Brian Doyle - 09-03-2025, 06:35 PM - Forum: JFK Assassination
- Replies (4)
|
 |
Jim DiEugenio is over on The Education Forum admonishing some of the regular trolls for not having read Armstrong's 'Harvey & Lee'...However Jim then turns around and offers one of his classic, patronizing non review reviews of Armstrong where he avoids ever committing to anything...Brian Scantland isn't fooled by this...Scantland asks DiEugenio "Are you going to do a Kennedys And King article on this?"...What Scantland is really saying there is "when are you going to practice what you preach and actually commit to a position on Armstrong?"...This is a classic example of the DiEugenio "trick" where he shows high skill on some assassination subjects but then suddenly fails to show that same level of skill on other subjects like Armstrong where he plays dumb and pretends he's undecided...
In 2018 I made a major break-through in conspiracy research when I discovered Sarah Stanton witnessing Oswald waiting for CIA operative Mrs Reid to clear the 2nd Floor Lunch Room out...The reaction of DiEugenio was to team up with Gordon like two alley muggers and bully it off the board...What I discovered was literally one of the most important evidence discoveries in research history...So while Jim D is hypocritically lecturing people for ignoring evidence he himself has never once mentioned my major solving of the case in his partnership with that coward Gordon...DiEugenio criticizes Greg Parker for never reading Armstrong yet he forgets that he has been giving reference to Parker and sending people to his material for years...DiEugenio has a whole internet full of sycophants who help him avoid accounting for it - many of whom are moderators...It is literally Gordon's job to keep DiEugenio honest on this, however Gordon does the opposite and snuggles up to DiEugenio to stifle a solving of the case...DiEugenio's undecidedness literally directly aids Armstrong's deniers...Jim is much more guilty than them because he HAS read the book...Something that DiEugenio's sycophants will never confront him with...
DiEugenio is a liar...He's not undecided on 'Harvey & Lee'...Instead, he is calculating a political position on how committing to Armstrong affects his clicks...Just like DiEugenio threw me under the bus he is doing the same to Armstrong while pretending to offer him luke warm support...Jim is a coward because he hides behind that cowardly crook Gordon and his cowardly censorship...Gordon trades corruption for a quick route to clicks and Jim takes the dirty deal...Jim then has the balls to lecture others on what he is much more guilty of...
The reason Jim doesn't come over here and answer this is because he knows it is true...Jim prefers the dark shadow of Gordon's leather wing, even if it comes at the expense of the most important discoveries of our generation...He's a bum...
|
|
|
| The Secret Murder Of Brian Jones By Richard Gilbride |
|
Posted by: Brian Doyle - 09-03-2025, 12:20 AM - Forum: Political Assassinations
- No Replies
|
 |
Richard Gilbride has authored a powerful book outlining the murder of Rolling Stones founder Brian Jones...When I first started reading it I said to myself let's see what Richard has to say...By the time I was finished I was impressed by the shocking scenario Gilbride laid out and its profound dimensions...As an investigator of Jimi Hendrix's murder in England many of the shocking things Gilbride exposed came as no surprise to me - however that didn't make them any less interesting and I consider it a must-read...Upon reading this book I now realize the depth of the scandal involved in Jones' death equals the level of cover-up needed to conceal it...Just the cover-up alone is proof in itself...Gilbride does a good job showing how much evidence was suppressed...
Good work Richard...Sometimes justice waits for a skilled writer to come along and put it all together...Brian Jones finally bears witness on all those who so wickedly betrayed him...
|
|
|
| Simpich And Burroughs |
|
Posted by: Brian Doyle - 06-03-2025, 08:09 PM - Forum: JFK Assassination
- No Replies
|
 |
Back in 2019 I drove to Richard Gilbride's in New Hampshire with my cinema-quality SONY camera with the intention of interviewing Butch Burroughs...Burroughs had an important witnessing of a second Oswald at the Texas Theater that had never been recorded on video...This Jim Marrs era witness needed his witnessing recorded and strengthened in relation to the greater conspiracy evidence...Gilbride and myself contacted Bill Simpich, who had communicated with Burroughs, and Simpich said he would arrange the interview...
When Gilbride called Burroughs, Butch told him that he only did interviews with one researcher whom he was in regular communication with...In the days before, Simpich had been less than pro-active in securing an interview for us...Simpich had told The Education Forum that he would interview Burroughs...It is 6 years now and Simpich never interviewed Burroughs...
Butch Burroughs had some seriously important conspiracy witnessing that seriously bolstered the Harvey & Lee theory...That witnessing needed skilled guidance to refine its impact...It needed to be recorded...Gilbride and I had his pick-up truck fueled and ready along with my interview equipment...We were left freezing on the sidewalk with Simpich less than responsive...
Recently on The Education Forum Simpich posted that someone needed to interview Butch Burroughs...
|
|
|
| Is Russia Really The Baddie? |
|
Posted by: Fred Steeves - 20-02-2025, 08:11 PM - Forum: Geopolitical Hotspots
- Replies (29)
|
 |
So after having a legitimate thread deleted, and endured multiple ad hominem attacks on my character, I'm going to try once more just to see if a modicum of free speech is allowed on this once upon a time great forum.
But before I start, one more thing from the forum rules thread:
Quote:2. This forum champions free speech. In this regard, its founders� role models include Lenny Bruce, George Carlin, and certain framers of the United States Constitution.
Forum Rules
Does this forum really champion free speech? No, I think not, not any more, and daring to share any thoughts here not in lockstep agreement with admin will surely be the end of my tenure here. But let me just highlight that these people were instigators for truth, freedom of speech, and challenging establishment narratives, which is exactly what I'm doing here. Did I show back up here with that intent? Absolutely not! But once I happened to stumble into seeing how dissenting opinions are now treated here, it became my mission, my duty as a free man and a free thinker, establishment narratives cand threats of banning be damned.
With no further ado here we go, straight to the soft spot of the western establishment narrative. I contend that Vladimir Putin is not the baddie of this story, that instead, he and his country are guilty of standing in the way of the western unipole order, remaining as such. I contend, that much of the hysteria we are witness to is a modern day McCarthyism. If you don't hate Russia with every fiber of your being, and if you don't long to see that the 3 year old proxy war against them continue on down until the last Ukrainian soldier is dead, then you are hereby rendered a despicable person and to be treated with great suspicion. Maybe even an enemy of the State? A Putin Puppet?
The way I see it, the US has been the world's sole hegemon since the fall of the Soviet Union circa 1991, it got comfortable there, and with the sudden rise of a multipolar world, it is desperate to regain that sole hegemon position at all cost. Perhaps even risking extinction of the huma race at large if it must come down to that.
So why the shrieks of horror at someone going against the "Russia Bad!" narrative machine in today's polite society? Well that's pretty clear now, just as why is it now considered anti Semitic to speak out against the genocide of the Palestinians? Or why was Boy Bush compelled to say "either you're with us, or you're with the terrorists" as he lied our way into destroying Irag...
Getting back to direct topic here - this is not to say Putin is a nice man, this is to say, IMHO, that he is simply not the latest incarnation of Hitler as he is ubiquitously portrayed, and that the narrative of why he invaded Ukraine is a lie similar in magnitude to the big lie that manufactured consent to pave our way into the destruction of Iraq.
Now I'm more than happy to back my opinion with verifying evidence; but being that this thread is likely to meet the same fate as the other deletions, I'm not inclined to go much further than state my opening opinion. This is what I was instructed to do, don't dare challenge the stated opinions of others, state your own case, and that's *precisely* what I'm doing.
|
|
|
| Genocide - Definition, Origin, Applications |
|
Posted by: Peter Lemkin - 11-02-2025, 04:17 PM - Forum: Historical Events
- No Replies
|
 |
Quote:Genocide
Raphael Lemkin
American Scholar, Volume 15, no. 2 (April 1946), p. 227-230
This article is can also be read in the author's French version or in Spanish translation
I: "A crime without a name."
II: The word "genocide"
III: An international crime
IV: Creating a legal framework
V: Genocide in time of war
VI: Proposal for an International Treaty, including the following principles:
1. Definition
2. Universal Repression
3. Extradition
4. Both those who gave and received the orders are liable, as well as those who incited the crime
5. Offending States accont- abler to the United Nations Security Council
6. Revising the Hague Convention
7. Genocide protection in the peace treaties with Axis satillite countries.
Key writings of
Raphael Lemkin
on Genocide
Quick Guide to the Series
Introduction
1933:
'General (Transnational) Danger'
1944:
Axis Rule in Occupied Europe
1945:
'Genocide: A Modern Crime'
1946:
'The Crime of Genocide'
1947:
'Genocide as a Crime under International Law'
I: "A crime without a name."
The last war has focused our attention on the phenomenon of the destruction of whole populations -of national, racial and religious groups - both biologically and culturally. The German practices, especially in the course of occupation, are too well known. Their general plan was to win the peace though the war be lost, and that goal could have been achieved through successfully changing the political and demographic interrelationships in Europe in favor of Germany. The population not destroyed was to be integrated in the German cultural, political and economic pattern.
In this way a mass obliteration of nationhoods had been planned throughout occupied Europe. The Nazi leaders had stated very bluntly their intent to wipe out the Poles, the Russians; to destroy demographically and culturally the French element in Alsace-Lorraine, the Slavonians in Carniola and Carinthia. They almost achieved their goal in exterminating the Jews and Gypsies in Europe. Obviously, the German experience is the most striking and the most deliberate and thorough, but history has provided us with other examples of the destruction of entire nations, and ethnic and religious groups. There are, for example, the destruction of Carthage; that of religious groups in the wars of Islam and the Crusades; the massacres of the Albigenses and the Waldenses; and more recently, the massacre of the Armenians.
While society sought protection against individual crimes, or rather crimes directed against individuals, there has been no serious endeavor hitherto to prevent and punish the murder and destruction of millions. Apparently, there was not even an adequate name for such a phenomenon. Referring to the Nazi butchery in the present war, Winston Churchill said in his broadcast of August, 1941, "We are in the presence of a crime without a name."
II: The word "genocide"
Would mass murder be an adequate name for such a phenomenon? We think not, since it does not connote the motivation of the crime, especially when the motivation is based upon racial, national or religious considerations. An attempt to destroy a nation and obliterate its cultural personality was hitherto called denationalization. This term seems to be inadequate, since it does not connote biological destruction. On the other hand, this term is mostly used for conveying or for defining an act of deprivation of citizenship. Many authors, instead of using a generic term, use terms connoting only some functional aspect of the main generic notion of the destruction of nations and races. Thus, the terms "Germanization," "Italianization," "Magyarization" are used often to connote the imposition by a stronger nation (Germany, Italy, Hungary) of its national pattern upon a group controlled by it. These terms are inadequate since they do not convey biological destruction, and they cannot be used as a generic term. In the case of Germany, it would be ridiculous to speak about the Germanization of the Jews or Poles in western Poland, since the Germans wanted these groups eradicated entirely.
Hitler stated many times that Germanization [p. 228] could only be carried out with the soil, never with men. These considerations led the author of this article to the necessity of coining a new term for this particular concept: genocide. This word is made from the ancient Greek word genos (race, clan) and the Latin suffix cide (killing). Thus, genocide in its formation would correspond to such words as tyrannicide, homicide, patricide.
III: An international crime
Genocide is the crime of destroying national, racial or religious groups. The problem now arises as to whether it is a crime of only national importance, or a crime in which international society as such should be vitally interested. Many reasons speak for the second alternative. It would be impractical to treat genocide as a national crime, since by its very nature it is committed by the state or by powerful groups which have the backing of the state. A state would never prosecute a crime instigated or backed by itself.
By its very legal, moral and humanitarian nature, it must be considered an international crime. The conscience of mankind has been shocked by this type of mass barbarity. There have been many instances of states expressing their concern about another state's treatment of its citizens. The United States rebuked the government of Czarist Russia as well as that of Rumania for the ghastly pogroms they instigated or tolerated. There was also diplomatic action in behalf of the Greeks and Armenians when they were being massacred by the Turks. States have even entered into international treaties by which they assumed specific obligations in the treatment of their own nationals. We may, in this respect, refer to the treaty entered into between the United States and Spain in 1898, in which the free exercise of religion was assured by the United States to the inhabitants of the territories which were ceded to her.
Another classical example of international concern in the treatment of citizens of other states by their governments is provided by the minority treaties under the auspices of the League of Nations which were signed by a number of European countries after the first World War. Again, the declaration of the Eighth International Conference of American States provides that any persecution on account of racial or religious motives which makes it impossible for a group of human beings to live decently is contrary to the political and judicial systems of America. The Charter of the United Nations Organization also provides for the international protection of human rights, indicating that the denial of such rights by any state is a matter of concern to all mankind.
Cultural considerations speak for international protection of national, religious and cultural groups. Our whole heritage is a product of the contributions of all nations. We can best understand this when we realize how impoverished our culture would be if the peoples doomed by Germany, such as the Jews, had not been permitted to create the Bible, or to give birth to an Einstein, a Spinoza; if the Poles had not had the opportunity to give to the world a Copernicus, a Chopin, a Curie; the Czechs, a Huss, a Dvorak; the Greeks, a Plato and a Socrates; the Russians, a Tolstoy and a Shostakovich.
There are also practical considerations. Expulsions of law-abiding residents from Germany before this war created frictions with the neighboring countries to which these peoples were expelled. Mass persecutions forced mass flight. Thus, the normal migration between countries assumes pathological dimensions.
Again, international trade depends upon confidence in the ability of the individuals participating in the interchange of goods to fulfill their obligations. The arbitrary and wholesale confiscations of the properties of whole groups of citizens of one state for racial or other reasons deprives them of their capacity to discharge their obligations to citizens of other states. Many American citizens were deprived of the possibility of claiming debts incurred by German importers after these importers were destroyed by the Hitler regime. Finally, genocide in time of peace creates international tensions and leads to war. It was used by the Nazi regime to strengthen the alleged unity and totalitarian control of the German people as a preparation for war.
IV: Creating a legal framework
Once we have recognized the international implications of genocidal practices, we must create the legal framework for the recognition of genocide as an international crime. The significant feature of international crime is a recognition that because of its international importance it must be punished and punishable through international cooperation. The establishment of international machinery for such punishment is essential.
Thus, it has been recognized by the law of nations and by the criminal codes of many nations that crimes which affect the common good of mankind - as, for example, piracy, unlawful production and trade in narcotics, forgery of money, trade in women and children, trade in slaves - all these are international crimes (delicta juris gentium). For such crimes, the principle of universal repression has been adopted, namely the culprit can be punished not only before the courts of the country where the crime has been perpetrated, but also by courts of the country where the culprit can be apprehended if he escaped justice in his own country. For example, a currency forger who committed his crime in Paris and escaped to Prague can be punished validly in the latter city.
In 1933, at the Fifth International Conference for the Unification of Criminal Law (under the auspices of the Fifth Committee of the League of Nations) the author of the present article introduced a proposal providing for this type of jurisdiction for acts of persecution amounting to what is now called genocide. Unfortunately, at that time, his proposal was not adopted. Had this principle been adopted at that time by international treaty, we would not now have all the discussions about ex post facto law, in relation to crimes committed by the German government against its own citizens prior to this war. [p. 229]
V: Genocide in time of war
A ruthless regime finds it easiest to commit genocide in time of war. It then becomes a problem of the treatment, or, rather, mistreatment, of a civilian population by an occupant. The Fourth Hague Convention establishes a rule of law in the protection of civilian populations which an occupant must respect. Within the purview of this law comes the protection of the honor, liberty, life, family rights and property rights of the population in the occupied country.
Genocide can be carried out through acts against individuals, when the ultimate intent is to annihilate the entire group composed of these individuals; every specific act of genocide as directed against individuals as members of a national or racial group is illegal under the Hague Convention. If the killing of one Jew or one Pole is a crime, the killing of all the Jews and all the Poles is not a lesser crime. Moreover, the criminal intent to kill or destroy all the members of such a group shows premeditation and deliberation and a state of systematic criminality which is only an aggravated circumstance for the punishment.
Genocide has been included in the indictment of the major war criminals for the use of the Nuremberg trials. It reads as follows:
Quote:They (the defendants) conducted deliberate and systematic genocide - viz., the extermination of racial and national groups - against the civilian populations of certain occupied territories in order to destroy particular races and classes of people, and national, racial or religious roups, particularly Jews, Poles, Gypsies and others.
By including genocide in the indictment, the enormity of the Nazi crimes has been more accurately described. Moreover, as in the case of homicide, the natural right of existence for individuals is implied: by the formulation of genocide as a crime, the principle that every national, racial and religious group has a natural right of existence is claimed. Attacks upon such groups are in violation of that right to exist and to develop within an international community as free members of international society. Thus, genocide is not only a crime against the rules of war, but also a crime against humanity.
Only after the cessation of hostilities could the whole gruesome picture of genocide committed in the occupied countries be reviewed. During the military occupation unconfirmed rumors about genocide leaked out from behind the iron curtains covering enslaved [p. 230] Europe. The International Red Cross was precluded from visiting occupied countries and gathering information about the mistreatment of the civilian populations. It so happened because the Geneva Convention gave to the International Red Cross the right to supervise and control only the treatment of prisoners of war. A paradoxical situation was created: men who went into the battlefield with a considerable expectancy of death survived, while their families, left behind in supposed security, were annihilated.
The author of the present article has proposed in his book Axis Rule in Occupied Europe that international law be changed so that in time of war the treatment of civilian populations will also be under supervisory control of an international body like the International Red Cross. The Swedish newspaper, Dagens Nyheter, of November 2, 1945, announced that the chairman of the Swedish Red Cross, Count Bernadotte referred to the author's proposal as acceptable for consideration at a future conference of the International Red Cross, and declared that the Swedish Red Cross would support it. While the writer is gratified by this development, he hopes that other governments will support the proposal to change international law.
VI: Proposal for an International Treaty,
including the following principles:
On the basis of the foregoing considerations, the author proposes that the United Nations as they are now organized, together with other invited nations, enter into an international treaty which would formulate genocide as an international crime, providing for its prevention and punishment in time of peace and war. This treaty, basically, should include, among other things, the following principles:
Quote:1. The crime of genocide should be recognized therein as a conspiracy to exterminate national, religious or racial groups. The overt acts of such a conspiracy may consist of attacks against life, liberty or property of members of such groups merely because of their affiliation with such groups. The formulation of the crime may be as follows: "Whoever, while participating in a conspiracy to destroy a national, racial or religious group, undertakes an attack against life, liberty or property of members of such groups is guilty of the crime of genocide."
2. The crime so formulated should be incorporated in every national criminal code of the signatories. The defendants should be liable not only before the courts of the country where the crime, was committed, but in case of escape shall be liable as well, before the courts of the country where they are apprehended.
Quote:3. Persons accused of genocide should not be treated as political criminals for purposes of extradition. Extradition should not be granted except in cases where sufficient evidence exists to indicate that the requesting country will earnestly prosecute the culprits.
4. The liability for genocide should rest on those who gave and executed the orders, as well as on those who incited to the commission of the crime by whatever means, including formulation and teaching of the criminal philosophy of genocide. Members of government and political bodies which organized or tolerated genocide will be equally responsible.
5. Independently of the responsibility of individuals for genocide, states in which such a policy obtains should be held accountable before the Security Council of the United Nations Organization. The Council may request the International Court of Justice to deliver an advisory opinion to determine whether a state of genocide exists within a given country before invoking, among other things, sanctions to be leveled against the offending country. The Security Council may act either on its own initiative or on the basis of petitions submitted by members of interested national, religious or racial groups residing either within or without the accused country.
6. The Hague Convention and other pertinent treaties should be changed to the effect that in case of war, an international body (such as the International Red Cross) should have the right to supervise the treatment of civilian populations by occupants in time of war in order to ascertain whether genocide is being practiced by such occupant.
7. A multilateral treaty for the prevention and punishment of genocide should not preclude two or more countries from entering into bilateral or regional treaties for more extensive protection against genocide. In this connection it is well to note that the Allied Governments in accordance with the Moscow agreements of December, 1945, have decided to enter into formal treaties of peace with the Axis satellite countries Hungary, Bulgaria and Rumania, which practiced genocide in this war according to the German pattern. It is of impelling importance that anti-genocide clauses be included in these treaties.
_________
RAPHAEL LEMKIN, eminent Polish scholar, and author of many books and articles published in several languages, is adviser on foreign affairs to the War Department. In his recent book, Axis Rule in Occupied Europe, Dr. Lemkin originated concepts included in the indictment of German war criminals at the Nuremberg trials, where he served on the staff of the U. S. Chief of Counsel for Prosecution of Criminality.
|
|
|
| The Dirty Research Community Under James Gordon |
|
Posted by: Brian Doyle - 09-02-2025, 07:25 PM - Forum: JFK Assassination
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Denis Morissette posted an image of Sarah Stanton in the Owens Film on The Education Forum...Morissette asked for help finding the source of that image and got no response from the regular Prayer Man posters...
Skilled analysis of the frame Morissette posted shows that the bare skin of Stanton's ring neck dress style is visible in the image...What is seen in the Owens frame is a dead match for the open ring neck style seen in the 6th Floor Museum 1st generation copy of the Darnell Film...
I assume that, over a year later, meek and yielding Morissette is finally following-through and trying to locate that film in order find better frames...When I instructed Morissette to do that over a year ago he responded by putting me on block...
If you examine the Prayer Man group they practiced a much higher level of analysis when trying to force Prayer Man to be Oswald...Suddenly, as the total lack of response in that thread shows, the Prayer Man believers no longer possess that level of analysis and there is no one doing any basic searching or technical review of that evidence...This is pure, corrupted, directed non-participation in order to avoid correct evidence...This is the "DiEugenio Trick" where the skill level Jim D offers wildly varies according to the political winds...They are pretending they don't see that ring neck in Owens...
When I applied for re-admission to The Education Forum James Gordon interceded saying "That my nonsense would no longer be tolerated"...Gordon is a total incompetent and unfit for academic moderation...He uses defamation and false accusations to censor people who show what an unqualified jackass he is...I was ultimately denied re-admission by the corpulent ass-kisser Mark Knight who said I had called Kathy Beckett a "whore" on McAdams' unmoderated site - where such things were not considered violations...All Knight was doing there was proving I had committed no violations on The Education Forum...Beckett had gone to MacAdams and taunted me over being banned from the Education Forum...Beckett, Knight, and Gordon had all avoided the basic point that Gordon had invented rules to ban an innocent person for disproving Greg Parker's trolling bullshit...
It is under this dark and backwards rule that Morissette's image of Stanton in Owens, and its visible woman's dress neckline, is being corruptedly avoided by the same group that censors those who show it...That ignorant incompetent Gordon is still being allowed to ban and defame those who show the correct evidence and the lack of follow-through is being protected by persons who have the balls to describe themselves as a credible research society...
I see David Josephs has not offered his "You ain't gonna show what you don't want to know"...
Dishonest bastards...
|
|
|
|