Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 1,360
» Latest member: Natalie Bee
» Forum threads: 16,346
» Forum posts: 51,262

Full Statistics

Online Users
There are currently 387 online users.
» 0 Member(s) | 383 Guest(s)
Applebot, Bing, Google, Yandex

Latest Threads
Moderator Sandy Larsen
Forum: JFK Assassination
Last Post: Alan Ford
27-03-2024, 06:12 PM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 455
Harvey In Hungary
Forum: JFK Assassination
Last Post: Brian Doyle
21-03-2024, 07:03 PM
» Replies: 7
» Views: 366
Evidence of a Frontal Sho...
Forum: JFK Assassination
Last Post: Gil Jesus
05-03-2024, 02:07 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 112
Evidence of a Frontal Sho...
Forum: JFK Assassination
Last Post: Gil Jesus
02-03-2024, 02:16 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 48
Evidence of a Frontal Sho...
Forum: JFK Assassination
Last Post: Gil Jesus
27-02-2024, 01:40 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 69
ELEVATORS TELL NO LIES- ...
Forum: JFK Assassination
Last Post: Brian Doyle
22-02-2024, 07:40 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 131
Evidence of a Frontal Sho...
Forum: JFK Assassination
Last Post: Gil Jesus
14-02-2024, 01:31 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 118
Evidence of a Frontal Sho...
Forum: JFK Assassination
Last Post: Gil Jesus
06-02-2024, 02:32 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 127
Speer Says Deep Politics ...
Forum: JFK Assassination
Last Post: Brian Doyle
24-01-2024, 09:56 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 167
Why Jeremy Bojczuk Is A F...
Forum: JFK Assassination
Last Post: Brian Doyle
24-01-2024, 09:24 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 110

 
  DiEugenio Gives Reference To ROKC Troll Farm And Kamp
Posted by: Brian Doyle - 09-08-2023, 03:02 PM - Forum: JFK Assassination - No Replies

Jim DiEugenio is at it again on the Education Forum...


He has given ringing endorsement to one of the biggest evidence manglers on the planet in the form of Bart Kamp and has done so by means of praising some of the worst screwed-up hack researchers over on the Education Forum...


Jim wrote:


"Nice work , all three of you, DJ, Pat and Andrej.
I am looking forward to this book when it comes out in paper.
Its the kind of volume I need to spend like 3 days with at Corner Bakery."


Pat Speer, David Josephs, and Andrej Stancak have just made the Prayer Man/Lovelady-Shelley evidence as clear as mud over on the Education Forum and they are getting the full approval of abstract evidence blind man Jim D...Which goes to show that JFK internet research is based on who you know and not what you know...


When I first signed on to the Deep Politics Forum in 2010 it was clearly understood that the DPF stood in opposition to the loose swamp-like research that was tolerated on the Education Forum as well as its rogue moderation...Regular DPF members Josephs and DiEugenio are making a mockery of that previous orientation and strongly backing what DPF was originally formed to counter...Both Kamp and ROKC administrator Greg Parker are banned from the Deep Politics Forum...Both Josephs and DiEugenio are never taken to task for this serious conflict of interest and I myself cannot point it out on the Education Forum because I am vilified there and permanently banned...Those persons have made an inextricable farce out of JFK research...


That EF crew is mangling the fact that the two men seen going up the Elm St extension are clearly Lovelady & Shelley as they testified...Sandy Larsen could join that discussion because he proved that Gloria Calvery is seen on the steps in Darnell and therefore proves the timing that sends Lovelady & Shelley up the extension, however, since the credo of the Education Forum is dishonesty, Larsen stays quiet and betrays his partner Thomas Graves who got banned for standing up for my research...How honest is that?...


And now we have David Josephs hanging on to Armstrong's belt and arguing that Shelley, with his clearly-seen tie in Altgens, is actually Molina...Josephs is stupidly wrong on that but the blind ignoramus Gordon has made it a permanent banning offense to point it out...Molina is next to Shelley with his hands shielding his eyes from the sun...Gordon has made criticism of such idiotic research claims a banning offense...The Education Forum is dedicated to protecting such stupidity with no accountability for the administration...


This muddy farce is all designed to promote Bart Kamp and his book in a popularity club fashion that is the true purpose of the Education Forum...All the stray bullshit that is being posted in the Education Forum Prayer Man thread is designed to support Oswald as Prayer Man even though it has been conclusively proven that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...This matters not to Gordon who deals with his moderation incompetency by falsely accusing those who point it out...The EF is still up to its old business only this time with the strong support of several Deep Politics Board members...


It should be made clear by somebody that Victoria Adams & Sandra Styles did NOT see Lovelady & Shelley when they got down to the 1st Floor...All of those offenders are failing to mention the fact that Barry Ernest got to Sandra Styles and she corroborated Adams' insistence that the two girls never saw Lovelady & Shelley on the 1st Floor...


Even though Jim praises Stancak, Josephs, and Speer on their Prayer Man input he fails to explain why he omitted the Prayer Man theory from his recent 'JFK Revisited' documentary...Actions speak louder than words...   

Print this item

  Prayer Man More Than Just A Fuzzy Picture
Posted by: Brian Doyle - 04-08-2023, 05:04 PM - Forum: JFK Assassination - Replies (4)

Pete Mellor has posted on the Education Forum that Bart Kamp has put out a new book entitled "Prayer Man More Than Just A Fuzzy Picture"...This is the Prayer Man hijacking network taking over the Education Forum and being allowed by the criminally-incompetent moderator James Gordon to post pro-Prayer Man posts right in the face of my evidence that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...Remember now people...James Gordon is getting away with the murder of posing himself as the superior judge here for whom I failed to pass muster while he ignores my highly intelligent proof that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton and allows one of the worst pernicious troll farms to infect JFK research - all under the guise of Education Forum administration, the definition of which is who Gordon bans and doesn't ban with his heavily-applied banning button...My correct Prayer Man proof had a special rule made for it by the Nazi tyrant Gordon pronouncing that neither myself or my evidence could ever be posted on the Education Forum...To this day Gordon refuses to explain why he is disallowing his membership access to the correct Prayer Man solution or why he is basically turning his Education Forum website over to Greg Parker's trolls...There is a giant elephant in the room here as well as an entire community marching naked down Main Street...It is incredible how cowardly the research community is...Instead of speaking up for me and my unfair banishment they stay silent and don't answer Mellor's post...They obey Gordon's academically-backwards edict and aid this movement towards wrong evidence...Gordon uses false accusations and false pronouncements of rules violations to avoid honestly accounting for why he disallows the correct solution for Prayer Man and encourages already-disproven evidence...


Kamp and the Prayer Man group could not have done this without the aid and assistance of the JFK Conspiracy research community and its moderators...That group has aided and abetted this affront to good research and legitimized Greg Parker's troll group by means of failure to respond...Staying quiet while your research community is being invalidated by trolls, shoddy researchers, and cranks like Parker, is equal to consent and there is no excuse for it no matter how much Jim DiEugenio approves...There's not one person brave enough to stand up and say "What about Brian Doyle's evidence that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton?"...

Print this item

  Evidence of Witness Tampering in the case against Oswald
Posted by: Gil Jesus - 28-07-2023, 11:31 AM - Forum: JFK Assassination - No Replies

https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.ne...-tampering

Print this item

  NO Evidence
Posted by: Gil Jesus - 16-07-2023, 06:10 PM - Forum: JFK Assassination - Replies (3)

https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.ne...7/evidence

Print this item

  Why Mark Knight Should Never Be Allowed To Be A Moderator
Posted by: Brian Doyle - 15-07-2023, 05:38 PM - Forum: JFK Assassination - Replies (1)

Knight wrote:


" I'm agnostic as to whether there's any "there" there in the Harvey and Lee story. Here's why.

I was born and grew up in a county in southern Indiana. I married a girl from the next county to the east, and we lived most of our married life in the second county to the east of my home county. A few years into our marriage, my wife was a patient in the local hospital. When I was getting her registered, the registrar asked me if I'd ever been a patient in the same hospital. I had not, and when I inquired why she was asking, I discovered that there was ANOTHER Mark Knight, down to the same middle initial, who had a substantial outstanding bill. Only after giving her my Social Security number did I establish in her mind that I was a different Mark Knight.

So I started asking questions. I discovered there was another Mark Knight, same middle initial, who had graduated high school the same year I had graduated, but in the county in which I was then living. We had grown up 25 miles apart, we weren't related as far as I'd been able to determine to date, and neither of us has ever met the other. But his credit problems came up every time I applied for credit, and I've had to dispute numerous items on my credit report over the years.

So as far as Harvey and Lee go, perhaps there's nothing nefarious involved. Maybe there are just a lot of coincidences such as what I discovered with my own "namesake" in southern Indiana. To this point, I remain unconvinced that the Harvey and Lee case involves a great depth of subterfuge. "



Any person who is qualified to post on the Education Forum as a JFK Assassination researcher would understand what is wrong with the above statement and why Mark Knight should not be allowed to be an Education Forum moderator...Remember, the Education Forum is a website that goes out of its way to host Lone Nutters in some kind of dubious attempt at free speech...So right at the start it is a wheel-spinning forum where, no matter how strong a case of conspiracy evidence you present, the format of the forum is going to allow the deniers to ignore it and argue against it by structure...It is this kind of bogus format that generates moderators like Mark Knight and James Gordon...Why Mark Knight is a moderator or what qualifies him is unknown, but that doesn't stop him from having the final word without review or making self-exposing comments like the one above...To think that the brilliant, near-genius work of John Armstrong could be reduced to the moronic analogy Knight produces is an insult to the intelligence of any credible researcher...Armstrong's work on Captain Westbrook alone cracks the assassination...My brilliant work being reduced to "a shit-poster who doesn't work well with people" while ignoring my substantial, historical gains in JFK research, is also proof of Knight's lack of qualification and bias in favor of Gordon...All it really takes to be an Education Forum moderator is agreeing with Gordon all the time...

Jim DiEugenio also uses the exact same "I'm an agnostic" cop-out when asked to put some skin in the game on Harvey & Lee...He gets away with pretending he doesn't possess his usual expertise when it comes to certain issues...

It's time for a moderation shake-up in the research community...

Print this item

  My Education Forum Re-admission Request To James Gordon
Posted by: Brian Doyle - 11-07-2023, 07:15 PM - Forum: JFK Assassination - Replies (4)

James Gordon wrote:


Mr Doyle,

I agree with all Mark has said.

I will await your response to Mark, but I fully support Mark’s reference to “shitposting.”

Clealry in time the members of the admin team will make a decision on your re-admitance. Not to jump ahead to what that decision might come to be - and a non re-admitance is possible - if the team decide to give you another chance and you return ( even once to your previous antics ) I will immediately remove your membership for ever.

I recollect in the past giving you chance after chance. That will not happen this time. The admin team is tired of playing these games.

Do not assume this email suggests you will be re-admited. It does not. That said you now know the conditions that will affect your re-admitance should the admin team allow you back.

I suggest you take Mark’s email to you with the upmost seriousness.

James



Mr Gordon is lying above when he says he gave me chance after chance...It simply isn't true and the thread record will back me...Gordon is used to getting away with unchallenged murder on the Education Forum, so that is what he's doing here because he knows he will never be called on it by his automatically-approving back-up man Knight (who I have never seen disagree with Gordon or any of his terribly unjust rulings)...

So while Knight gets away with admitting that he didn't know what my original banning was about but he was going to enforce it anyway, and gets away with calling me a "Shit-Poster" (a hypocritical violation of Education Forum rules), Gordon is clearly abusing his authority and acting on personal grounds...

Gordon wrote "If you return to your previous antics you will be permanently banned"...And in doing that he succeeds in condemning me without ever showing any evidence of those "antics"...In Gordon's moderation world his simply accusing someone of violations is equal to condemning proof and unquestioning guilt...Gordon speaks from a position of unquestionable-ness...He says it - you are guilty...

But of we go back to the actual thread record the reality speaks quite differently...In 2016 I tried to present the Davidson enhancement as final proof that Prayer Man wasn't Oswald...I also tried to show my height argument that proved Prayer Man was far too short in height to be Oswald...I was immediately set upon by almost the entire board - with Gordon joining them...Gordon was taking Private Messages from the Prayer Man people, who tried to get around directly discussing my evidence by making specious methodology complaints...Gordon was relaying those complaints without checking their legitimacy first and using them to take moderator actions against me...It was this intentional railroading of the thread by this dubious means that detoured discussion away from my evidence and switched the topic to Gordon's false methodology complaints against me...Even worse, the Prayer Man people were the ones who were guilty of what they were accusing me of...It was when I pointed that out to Gordon that I got banned (He obviously realized I was correct)...

Since 2016 I have massively improved my evidence for Prayer Man being Stanton...However, since the JFK internet has been hijacked by the Prayer Man people, the false slander you see Gordon make above has been effectively used to censor it...Gordon is still being permitted to describe the best most intelligent presentation of evidence on the Prayer Man issue as the "antics" of a "Shit-Poster" that had been justly moderated...Knight gives zero accounting for this true version and Gordon is allowed to continue his horrifically unfair abuse...If you disprove a 95% majority with brilliant research they will not stand up for you when a rogue moderator unfairly bans you...Gordon and the membership have bypassed the rigor they call for and work with each other in an unholy relationship...That's how they avoided my evidence...

Gordon is a liar and the existing thread record does not support his lies above and attempt to disparage and defame me in order to justify his censoring of the correct Prayer Man evidence...Gordon moderated backwards and assisted the Prayer Man people to avoid Peer Review of Davidson and Peer Review of my height argument...This has stood uncorrected since I was banned in 2016 and now I see Gordon has added wrongful defamation and false claims of deserved moderation to his offenses...

All Gordon is doing above is using false moderator complaints to avoid my actually being allowed to fairly argue my proof...Gordon knows that if I were allowed to do what my research has earned that it would, in turn, prove I was correct and, in turn, prove that he wrongfully moderated...He's not going to let that happen as long as he has the power to railroad someone rather than let them make their case...No credible moderator or membership would look at my evidence and not admit I had proven Prayer Man was Sarah Stanton...These people shame themselves by using the intentional destruction of an innocent researcher in order to save face and preserve their bogus theory...

Print this item

  DiEugenio Betrays Conspiracy Research
Posted by: Brian Doyle - 03-07-2023, 11:11 PM - Forum: JFK Assassination - Replies (1)

Jim DiEugenio just made a post in the Education Forum Prayer Man thread praising well-known Conspiracy Denier Jeremy Bojczuk...He gave praise to Bojzcuk even though the post DiEugenio praised from Bojzcuk denied the many cases of films and cameras being seized from witnesses in Dealey Plaza...DiEugenio has teamed up with the Parker crew and is openly denying Gordon Arnold's film being taken from him along with many others...


Jim adds insult to injury by praising notorious disinformation nut Bart Kamp in the same post, adding that Bart Kamp is coming out with a new book that should help confirm Oswald is Prayer Man via Hosty's notes...Again, Jim is committing an in-your-face over the Prayer Man issue that he himself already admitted was Sarah Stanton...Jim avoids mentioning my research that shows Hosty actually admitted Oswald was in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room to Nigel Turner...


Jim's betrayal of good Conspiracy research here used to be a violation of this website's rules...However I'm sure it will be tolerated and my pointing it out (in compliance with the DPF site rules and purpose of the site) will be disliked...


Jim is all-in for ROKC and their notorious nutty claims...That, of course, is no problem because he is a member of the clique to whom the rules don't apply...5 stars for Benedict Arnold...

Print this item

  Gil Jesus Backs FBI Lies Against Important Witness Carolyn Arnold
Posted by: Brian Doyle - 20-06-2023, 05:44 PM - Forum: JFK Assassination - No Replies

Gil Jesus is attacking important Conspiracy witness Carolyn Arnold and he is using FBI lies to do so...


In 1978 Dallas Morning News Reporter Earl Golz met Carolyn Arnold and showed her her FBI statement for the first time since the assassination...The FBI quoted Carolyn as saying she caught a glimpse of Oswald in the Lobby at 12:15...Carolyn vehemently protested to Golz that she never said that and that she told them she had seen Oswald eating lunch alone at 12:25 in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room...Indeed, in the one March 1964 FBI statement that Carolyn was allowed to proofread the time of 12:25 was given...


Carolyn had explained to Golz that she was 9 months pregnant and was in the habit of getting drinks of water from the 2nd Floor clerical Lunch Room...Carolyn told Golz that, because of her pregnancy, and not wanting to stand too long in the sun, she delayed going out to watch the motorcade to the last moment and decided to get a drink of water before going out front...When she ducked-in to the 2nd Floor Lunch Room to get that drink she saw Oswald sitting at his usual spot alone eating lunch...The time was 12:25...


Gil Jesus is posting the FBI's lies that were used to cover-up Carolyn Arnold's real witnessing on Alt.Conspiracy.JFK and the Education Forum...He gets no resistance whatsoever from people who call themselves Conspiracy Researchers on those forums...By staying silent those CT researchers are failing to obey what the Deep Politics Forum was designed for...DPF was designed to counter the wrongful moderation being practiced at the Education Forum...Because of that wrongful moderation I am not allowed to go use the Education Forum for its purpose and raise a discussion on the evidence involved with Carolyn Arnold...This is one of the most important debates the Education Forum could ever host but it is being pre-emptively disallowed in order to serve the likes of the favored CT researchers over there...Don't forget that the Education Forum hosts and gives equal rights to Lone Nutters...


The JFK internet is seriously dysfunctional because even if I did post a debate about Carolyn Arnold it would be intentionally unparticipated in by those favored researchers...Those researchers fail to account for their enthusiastic support of the Education Forum and its moderation...The full evidence involved with Carolyn Arnold shows beyond a doubt that she witnessed something that was damning to the cover-up so the FBI lied and altered her statement in order to push her witnessing down to the 1st Floor where it could be discredited...And here you have so-called CT researcher Gil Jesus backing the FBI's lies and doing so against one of the most important Conspiracy witnesses...Just the fact Carolyn Arnold was never interviewed again to find out more about it tells you it was dangerous and true...After 1978 she never spoke about it again - which bespeaks serious intimidation and witness coercion - with Gil Jesus taking the side of the intimidators and their lies...With all this in mind Gil gets warm welcome and back slaps from the clique...I get universally rejected and if I brought this debate to the Education Forum those who had the information that proved me correct would with-hold it, the whole time calling themselves Conspiracy researchers...


To add insult to injury I discovered something incredibly important when I discovered Sarah Stanton hearing Oswald say he intended to go back in to the "Break Room" and not accompany Stanton down to watch the motorcade...Obviously that Break Room was the 2nd Floor Lunch Room where Carolyn Arnold would see Oswald moments later, therefore corroborating each other's witnessing...Gil and the Education Forum completely ignore this ground-breaking discovery...The normal rules of the game show that CT researchers have badly betrayed their own cause in order to perpetuate their petty spite and friendships over good research...It is amazing that people who call themselves Conspiracy researchers and moderators would leave someone who discovered something that important hanging, flapping out in the cold wind just so they could enforce their own personal spite - and do so because that researcher disproved Greg Parker's nutty Prayer Man theory...


It's a pretty pathetic research world out there with apparently no limit to the depths some will go or hypocrisy...

Print this item

  RUSSIA'S WAR ON ITSELF
Posted by: Lauren Johnson - 19-06-2023, 03:45 PM - Forum: Geopolitical Hotspots - Replies (14)

Putin is a puzzle.  This thread will be devoted to alternative views on his leadership to people such as Scott Ritter, Pepe Escobar, and formally The Saker, who now has quit blogging.  These persons and others cannot say enough good about Putin, despite what I call glitches in the matrix.  Without going into details, there are things that just don't add up to their vision of Putin the Great.

The next post will reveal the Mother of All Glitches: Putin's June 14 disastrous meeting with a group of approved embedded war journalists.

Print this item

  Daniel Ellsberg Dead
Posted by: Brian Doyle - 17-06-2023, 02:48 AM - Forum: Other - No Replies

The author of the Pentagon Papers, Daniel Ellsberg, has died of Pancreatic Cancer at 92...

Print this item