Jim DiEugenio recently appeared on "The Loser's Club" podcast to criticize Stephen King's production that showed Oswald shooting Kennedy from the 6th Floor...Jim participated in an hour and half program that listed the evidence King ignored in order to come to his faulty conclusion...

Part way through the show Jim told of Victoria Adams and her not seeing Oswald on the stairs and criticized King for ignoring it...

In his description of Victoria Adams' witnessing DiEugenio told the host that Adams and Styles ran from the windows as soon as the limousine disappeared under the triple underpass...This was correct and it was 8 seconds after the shots...From there Jim went on to describe how Mrs Garner saw Truly & Baker appear on the 4th Floor staircase landing immediately after Adams & Styles descended...

The problem with this is Jim DiEugenio stupidly endorses Bart Kamp's false belief that the 2nd Floor Lunch Room Encounter never happened...However DiEugenio fails to realize that he just endorsed evidence that forces the 2nd Floor Lunch Room Encounter to be real...Jim is a political bastard and this is his Achilles Heel...Jim is excellent at book-sourced research and one of the best in the business, however he has weird paradox of having a moron level ability at abstract analysis...Jim doesn't detect that for him to admit that Adams & Styles dashed from the 4th Floor windows 8 seconds after the shots, and that Mrs Garner saw Truly & Baker emerge as the first people after Adams & Styles, is tantamount to admitting that Truly & Baker passed the 2nd Floor Lunch Room at the time of the Lunch Room Encounter...What this shows is that Jim doesn't really believe Bart Kamp's bullshit about the 2nd Floor Lunch Room Encounter not happening...Jim endorses Kamp not out of evidentiary accuracy and rigor but out of a loyalty to mob-like packs of researchers...As Richard Gilbride correctly put in his recent post - Jim DiEugenio is not to be trusted...He offers moron-level fatal conflicts in his claims and enforces them with crony moderators who, like Jim, don't bother to pay attention to the details of what is being discussed...Jim doesn't pay attention to what he writes...He endorses Kamp in public but then cites material that refutes Kamp and doesn't notice the difference...

Jim gets away with this because he has a loyal set of moderators on the JFK internet who betray normal research standards and back anything he posts...Even though those moderators say they are beholden to rigor and good research they lie and they are just approving of anything that Jim posts...They are enforcing an insider's club (Loser's Club)...Those moderators are beneath low and they have now reached a point where you can publicly disprove them and they are arrogant enough to not answer...Even worse they offer the teenage girl level of input of giving your correct evidence an automatic one star review even though by doing that they are only proving your point even more...JFK research has reached a new low because of Mr DiEugenio and his implied demand for loyalty...Peer Review and credible moderation are in the toilet...

Does Jim come in to these threads and answer for himself?...No...Jim is above that...But it doesn't really matter because Jim knows he will get an automatic ruling in his favor no matter how badly he contradicts himself...No matter how many notorious trolls he backs at the expense of good researchers who get banned because of him...No matter how much good evidence gets ignored...The commonly accepted definition of what Jim does is known as "Intellectual Dishonesty" or "Cowardice"...

Watch Mark Knight, Sandy Larsen, and James Gordon enforce banning against the guy who disproved DiEugenio and ignore Jim's fatal conflicts while referring to themselves as serious moderators...Nowhere will any of the clique members call Jim out on the fact Adams & Styles bolting from the windows 8 seconds after the shots, and Mrs Garner seeing Truly & Baker as the first people after Adams & Styles (as Jim admits), necessitates Truly & Baker passing the Lunch Room at the time of the Lunch Room Encounter...

Jim should not beat himself up coming in here to honestly straighten it out and find the truth to keep innocent researchers from being banned because of him...Jim, don't worry...We're all in this together and those things happen from time to time...It is because of our personal character as researchers that we cover each other for research's sake...It is heartening to see the research community's response...

https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.ne...oswald-iii

Alastair Crooke gives an in depth analysis of the context of the attack and much more.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsSh0TW3os0

Because JFK research is mainly decided by an incestuous network of friends and not academic rigor charlatans like Bart Kamp not only go unchallenged - but they and their garbage research actually get strong support...Here is a perfect example of podcast host Alan Dale hosting Kamp in an uncritical, obsequious way where Kamp's faulty claims go unaddressed...These people build off each other...Dale promotes Kamp and his garbage research and in turn avoids exposure over the fact Dale is all form no substance...And in reciprocation Kamp is allowed to avoid the evidence that refutes him...A similar model happens on JFK websites where the moderators and members practice the same corruption while avoiding accounting for their faulty material...Dale is getting away with the murder of pretending none of our evidence that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton exists and Kamp is helping him...You are looking at how the Prayer Man theory got legs, and it wasn't by means of credible analysis:




 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAA2yoaxKjI&t=1s




My comment in the You Tube video comments section:


People like Alan Dale, Rob Clark, and Ed Opperman are responsible for seriously misleading the public by hosting Bart Kamp in a fawning, obsequious, uncritical way...As the researcher who has refuted Kamp and his ridiculous Prayer Man theory it is painful to see host after host treating the notorious Kamp this way and refusing to challenge him with the evidence I have proven...You will never see Kamp appear anywhere where there is an opposition or he is asked to confront the refuting evidence...He is always presented by himself on formats where there is no counter evidence...At 49 minutes Kamp makes a Freudian slip by mentioning "chronology"...The reason it is a Freudian slip is because Mr Kamp is very aware that the chronology of the Fritz, Bookhout, and Hosty notes all start at the Lunch Room Encounter 90 seconds after the shots...Fritz made this clear when he added the detail "When Officer Came In"...So Kamp is intentionally misleading the public when he mis-states that "Went Outside To Watch Presidential Parade" means at the time of the shots...The context from the notes clearly designates that passage occurs several minutes after the shots after the Lunch Room Encounter and it is Hosty saying it not Oswald...You will never see Bart Kamp publicly mention that James Hosty told Nigel Turner, with emphasis, "Oswald told us he was alone in the Lunch Room during the assassination"...Any researcher who isn't mainly interested in boyishly supporting Bart Kamp in a cheerleading manner, who pays attention to the facts Bart brags about (but doesn't practice himself), would instantly realize that the reason Hosty did not include that admission in his notes is because he knew it was Oswald's true location and exonerated him...The reason why Hosty didn't say which Lunch Room is because he knew it was the 2nd Floor Lunch Room and he didn't want to perjure himself...Fritz told the Commission outright that Oswald told him he was eating a cheese sandwich and apple in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room during the assassination...Bart never asks himself why Hosty did not include Oswald admitting he was in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room in his notes because he knows it refutes the Prayer Man theory...A credible researcher like myself then takes Hosty's admission that Oswald was in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room and realizes Fritz's, Bookhout's, and Hosty's notes all have a glaring gap where they removed it and that is why all 3 start at the Lunch Room Encounter - because they clumsily removed Oswald telling them he was in the Lunch Room right before...Prayer Man is also visibly 5 foot 4 when compared to Frazier...Sarah Stanton was 5 foot 4...Bart Kamp and his gang of thugs have gotten me banned from the JFK internet all for the crime of solving the scenario in the Depository and its Warren Commission cover-up...He's no hero...

While the production values of this presentation are excellent the content is disgustingly deceptive...Kamp has no respect for the people who paid to go to the Conference and is knowingly lying to them...This presentation is a dishonest exercise in evidence avoidance from beginning to end...Kamp is well aware that there is evidence to refute most of what he claims in this video:




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nd2lJ4Yef40





I posted this comment in the comments section of Kamp's video but it disappeared shortly after:



This video is an overt exercise in avoiding evidence...What the average unsuspecting viewer doesn't realize is how much counter evidence Bart Kamp is intentionally omitting in order to deliberately misinform...A person who possesses the technical skill to make such a presentation as this one is a person who is quite capable of showing the evidence that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...Kamp is well aware of the evidence but he deliberately with-holds it...Mr Kamp is not showing the viewers the enhancement of the Wiegman Film done by Chris Davidson where Sarah Stanton's face was seen on Prayer Man...It is quite obvious to those who have studied this subject that the reason Kamp doesn't show the Davidson Enhancement is because he knows it shows Stanton's face on Prayer Man...Another important piece of visual evidence Kamp dishonestly with-holds is the recent discovery of a woman's dress neckline on Prayer Man in Darnell...The clearly-seen woman's neckline in Darnell is corroborating proof of the Davidson Enhancement that also proves Prayer Man is Stanton...Kamp is quite capable of showing the public that woman's dress neckline on Prayer Man in Darnell...He doesn't because he knows it refutes his Prayer Man claim...Mr Kamp is not telling the truth about Sarah Stanton or Pauline Sanders' location on the steps...Sanders was found in between Shelley & Lovelady in the Altgens 6 image which placed her to the east of the glass door up against the divider like she told the Commission and not down the steps where Kamp falsely places her...Again, the level of technical expertise Kamp offers in this video gives no excuse for Kamp not showing the viewers Sanders in between Shelley & Lovelady in Altgens...The reason Kamp is avoiding showing that image is because he knows it refutes what he is claiming...As for Stanton, Lovelady placed Stanton next to him in the Prayer Man spot when the limousine passed the front steps...Kamp doesn't use his technical expertise to show you Gloria Calvery on the steps in Darnell...The reason he doesn't is because any showing of Calvery climbing the front steps in Darnell would calibrate the scene being shown in Darnell with Buell Frazier's statement that Sarah Stanton turned to him to tell him what Calvery had shouted...Very simply, Prayer Man is facing forward towards the motorcade in Wiegman...Darnell shows Prayer Man as having pivoted towards Frazier exactly like Frazier described Stanton as doing at the time...Counter to what Kamp falsely claims, Buell Frazier did describe who was in the Prayer Man spot when he described Stanton's actions in response to Gloria Calvery shouting "The president has been shot"...Frazier didn't quite catch what Calvery shouted so he looked at Stanton with a puzzled look and Stanton turned towards him and said "I think she said the president has been shot"...This is exactly what you see Prayer Man doing in between Wiegman and Darnell when Prayer Man pivots towards Frazier...You can see Frazier describe this in interviews that Kamp forgot to mention...The JFK research community has yet to recognize that it has another Cinque amongst them...Prayer Man was proven to be Sarah Stanton 7 years ago when Davidson showed Stanton's face on Prayer Man in Wiegman...

https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.ne...-oswald-bs

The existing Alt.Conspiracy.JFK Google group got buggy and sent some members to an endless Captcha link making them unable to post...So I created this new one:



https://groups.google.com/u/1/g/altconspiracyjfk

by Gil Jesus ( 2023 )

There are basically several reasons why I believe that the Dallas Police/ FBI/ Warren Commission's case against Oswald was fraudulent. I believe that these reasons are the "smoking guns" of Oswald's innocence because not only were many of the steps taken by authorities ILLEGAL, they do not fall into any category of what a normal homicide investigation would involve.
Not the least of these reasons was that the prosecutorial system in Dallas was corrupt.

Reason # 1: The prosecutorial system in Dallas was corrupt
In a criminal case, the credibility of the case is directly connected to the credibility of the people making the case. Justice cannot be served if the justice system is geared to anything other than bringing the REAL perpetrators to justice. 

During the tenure of Henry Wade as District Attorney of Dallas County, the DA's office was interested in only one thing: conviction rates.
Conviction rates are determined by dividing the number of convictions by the number of arrests.
For example, if you had nine convictions out of ten arrests, you'd have a 90% conviction rate.
Wade compiled a conviction rate so impressive that defense attorneys ruefully called themselves the 7 Percent Club.

The problem with this system is that your interest is not necessarily in convicting the guilty party, but instead convicting the person you arrested.
And if you arrested the wrong person, it would require you to manufacture evidence against that suspect in such a way to convince a judge or jury of his guilt.
This is exactly what they did in Dallas County under Henry Wade's tenure.

Nineteen convictions — three for murder and the rest involving rape or burglary — won by Wade and two successors who trained under him were overturned after DNA evidence exonerated the defendants. 
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna25917791

District Attorney Craig Watkins became the first black elected chief prosecutor in any Texas county  back in 2006.
The new DA and other Wade detractors said the cases won under Wade were riddled with shoddy investigations, evidence was ignored and defense lawyers were kept in the dark. 
They note that the promotion system under Wade rewarded prosecutors for high conviction rates.

In the case of James Lee Woodard — released in April 2008 after 27 years in prison for a murder DNA showed he didn't commit — Wade's office withheld from defense attorneys photographs of tire tracks at the crime scene that didn't match Woodard's car.

John Stickels, a University of Texas at Arlington criminology professor and a director of the Innocence Project of Texas, blamed a culture of "win at all costs."
"When someone was arrested, it was assumed they were guilty," he said. "I think prosecutors and investigators basically ignored all evidence to the contrary and decided they were going to convict these guys."

In other words, the Dallas DA wasn't interested in convicting the right person, he was interested in convicting the person who was ARRESTED.

Wade wrote a manual for prosecutors in 1969 that was used for more than a decade. It gave instructions on how to keep minorities off juries.

By 1953, Henry Wade already had the city wired. Reporters treated his word as gospel, sometimes even buttressing Wade’s efforts in court with their own testimony. The Dallas Police Department and County Sheriff’s Office eagerly did his bidding.

Henry Wade's word was gold.

Wade was so highly regarded by the people of Dallas that he was able to convince a jury in 1954 to send an innocent man to the electric chair.
https://www.dmagazine.com/publications/d...ocent-man/

Wade's office had no problem charging innocent people for crimes they did not commit and presenting evidence in such a way as to obtain a conviction by a judge or jury.
With such a skill for framing innocent people for crimes they did not commit, the credibility of the DA's case against Lee Harvey Oswald deserves a second look.
As does the autheticity of the evidence in this case.

The Scoop Neckline evidence on Prayer Man in Darnell is pure vindication of myself and my evidence...

The JFK research community are a bunch of ball-less lowlifes because they don't stand up for an unfairly banned fellow researcher and his correct evidence...Especially when that researcher made them look like the fools they are...The only good man was Richard Gilbride and he got banned and ignored by those bullies too...

The Scoop Neckline evidence forces the issue of why I was banned in the first place, since my evidence has now been proven to be correct by corroborating proof...Since the Scoop Neckline evidence forces the Davidson enhancement to be correct by moot where then is the apology and re-admission such evidence would normally produce in any credible research community?...

The people who populate the Education Forum are cowards because they sit back and say nothing while that exonerated poster is slandered as being a "Shit-Poster whose antics would no longer be tolerated"...They are afraid to hold the imperialistic, dictatorial moderators accountable even when they are clearly proven wrong by the evidence...That holds true for Greg Parker as well who recently admitted on the ROKC forum that Prayer Man was not Oswald...(Kamp dishonestly pretends not to notice)...

So, since the Scoop Neckline evidence has proven it was the moderation and Prayer Man people who were in violation and not recognizing the correct evidence, what was the reason again why I was banned on the Education Forum and ROKC?...What kind of dishonest schmucks are running the show over there?...Mr Knight is ignoring the part where the "Shit-Poster" got totally validated by the evidence...Should a moderator be allowed to ignore the issue of the evidence so badly?...Especially when he is using that dishonest ignoring to enforce the wrongful banning of a person who was proven correct by the evidence?...

Sandy Larsen has lost his marbles and gone full Fetzer by publicly endorsing Ralph Cinque's "Gorilla Man" theory on the Education Forum...

Larsen is actually on the Education Forum right now bearing a moderator avatar while whole-heartedly endorsing that "Doorway Man" in the plaid shirt is not Billy Lovelady but is an impostor...

Bear in mind that Larsen is a staunch pro-Prayer Man poster...

This is the insult to our intelligence that is protected and overseen by James Gordon on the Education Forum...

Larsen is too unskilled to realize the differences in Lovelady's features in the Martin Film are due to strong variations in aspect ratio...

Just recently Larsen claimed that Lovelady's left arm in Altgens 6 is actually Carl Jones's arm (even though Jones is wearing a light-colored shirt)...