Wikipedia bows to CTKA

[Jim DiEugenio]

Very interesting article which shows that Rob Fernandez, the cover up artist and John McAdams asset at Wikipedia, has been reading our site.

We backed him up on the rifle.

And we are now going to back him up on the revolver.

http://www.ctka.net/2011/wiki_pt2.html

[Seamus Coogan]

Good stuff JP and Jim.

[Jim DiEugenio]

http://www.ctka.net/2011/wiki_pt3.html

This one talks about the actual formation and appointment of the Warren Commission.

What a pile of BS at Wiki, which is fast becoming the NY TImes of the JFK case.

[Kyle Burnett]

Good stuff. I only noticed one trivial fault, a misphrased sentence; "Everyone knew they conducting closed hearings."

[Albert Doyle]

I think America has violated its own false advertising laws by claiming it is a nation of free speech and free press. It's sad that when given the opportunity for free speech people censor themselves and serve the will of their Orwellian lords. Those lords take that as consent.


I got on a Wikipedia internal chat board with one of their moderators over their TWA Flight 800 entry. I told him that Wikipedia had entered provably false information in the case. He told me that Wikipedia only uses "reliable sources". I argued that since those sources were saying things that were provably false they were therefore no longer "reliable" by definition. I shortly after found myself blocked from the board after the moderator kindly asked me "if there was anything else?"

[Peter Lemkin]

I think America has violated its own false advertising laws by claiming it is a nation of free speech and free press. It's sad that when given the opportunity for free speech people censor themselves and serve the will of their Orwellian lords. Those lords take that as consent.


I got on a Wikipedia internal chat board with one of their moderators over their TWA Flight 800 entry. I told him that Wikipedia had entered provably false information in the case. He told me that Wikipedia only uses "reliable sources". I argued that since those sources were saying things that were provably false they were therefore no longer "reliable" by definition. I shortly after found myself blocked from the board after the moderator kindly asked me "if there was anything else?"

That sounds about 'right' for Wikipedia. Some of it is their bound-to-fail notion that everything needs to be 'neutral'- codeword for ás the majority see a historical event', codewords for 'how the Oligarchy want it to be spun and seen'. Wiki is OK on non-controversial issues; on controversial ones, you can bet your bottom, the viewpoint will mirror that of the Government and TPTB. They even have infiltrated moderators [from who knows where] to ensure this is so. Looking up on the major assassinations and Deep Political events, I start to get sick and do not use it for any of that and don't think it can be reformed - but any Don Quixotes who want to try, are most welcome and applauded.:wavey:

[Seamus Coogan]

I think America has violated its own false advertising laws by claiming it is a nation of free speech and free press. It's sad that when given the opportunity for free speech people censor themselves and serve the will of their Orwellian lords. Those lords take that as consent.


I got on a Wikipedia internal chat board with one of their moderators over their TWA Flight 800 entry. I told him that Wikipedia had entered provably false information in the case. He told me that Wikipedia only uses "reliable sources". I argued that since those sources were saying things that were provably false they were therefore no longer "reliable" by definition. I shortly after found myself blocked from the board after the moderator kindly asked me "if there was anything else?"

That sounds about 'right' for Wikipedia. Some of it is their bound-to-fail notion that everything needs to be 'neutral'- codeword for ás the majority see a historical event', codewords for 'how the Oligarchy want it to be spun and seen'. Wiki is OK on non-controversial issues; on controversial ones, you can bet your bottom, the viewpoint will mirror that of the Government and TPTB. They even have infiltrated moderators [from who knows where] to ensure this is so. Looking up on the major assassinations and Deep Political events, I start to get sick and do not use it for any of that and don't think it can be reformed - but any Don Quixotes who want to try, are most welcome and applauded.:wavey:

Here here young Albert!

[Seamus Coogan]

Good stuff. I only noticed one trivial fault, a misphrased sentence; "Everyone knew they conducting closed hearings."

Ssssshhhhhh Jim was having a really good day till you bought that up!!!!!!!

lol!

[Kyle Burnett]

Hehe, I just figured you guys might want it fixed as soon as possible, and I see it is. If you'd like an extra eye for proofreading articles before they're published, I'd be happy to help.

[Seamus Coogan]

Hehe, I just figured you guys might want it fixed as soon as possible, and I see it is. If you'd like an extra eye for proofreading articles before they're published, I'd be happy to help.

Kyle after seeing my shitty posts you know I need it lol. You should contact Jim Di he'd be glad for the time. You can do it here or via the website.