Paperback edition of Reclaiming Parkland: Expanded and Revised

[Albert Doyle]

Drago has challenged this book on the Burnham site. While I'm presently not happy with Jim right now because of his treatment of the Prayer Man evidence I would say Jim is not guilty of the credit-grabbing Drago is trying to pin on him. I don't think Jim was suggesting he was the originator of the Mexico City evidence, just that he was covering it. The Chicago evidence is open to interpretation. Even if Charles is right, Jim hasn't committed the extreme violation he's being accused of. Perhaps Jim should have mentioned that Chicago was possibly a ruse to create a false sense of safety in Dallas.


Off-Topic: FYI Jim: Jean Davison has posted at Duncan's forum.