06-06-2024, 05:03 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-06-2024, 05:43 PM by Brian Doyle.)
" Tolerance was and must continue to an important principle of this forum. "
Typical of Gordon, who doesn't know what he is doing either research or moderator-wise, the 'tolerance' he hails to is not what you would think it was...The tolerance that Gordon is talking about is allowing Speer to lie and distort freely and call it tolerance...
Gordon is a liar because he has zero tolerance for intelligent scrutiny of claims...The Education Forum JFK board calls itself a 'debate' board however as soon as you do that intelligently and challenge the false claims of some of the regular false claim makers you get Gordon and his so-called tolerance coming down on you for ill-defined rules violations that he can't cite that he is obviously making up as he goes along in order to protect the main offenders like Speer...Anyone who has a good handle on JFK research will see that Pat Speer is full of it and deliberately bends evidence in a false direction in order to repeatedly attack the main conspiracy evidence...Gordon is shirking his responsibility to control that and blaming the victims as if they were doing something wrong by holding Speer accountable on what is supposed to be debate board...Gordon is a complete incompetent and his moderation is mostly based on feel-good tone-policing and not good facts-based debate...You can see the regular Education Forum weasels go right for the opening in the current state of the forum thread while Gordon encourages their avoidance of the main issue...Once again Gordon is thundering in with holy intimidation as the site owner and switching the topic...He's helping avoid the main issue and is therefore just as guilty as Speer...He's all form, no substance...He is the problem as he hides behind the banning-guarded mask of seeking a solution...What the pathetic little man Gordon is doing is creating pompous wording to relieve himself of being held to the same standard as the members and that is quite British...
The Education Forum members regularly post high philosophy like Voltaire's aphorism that you should look at those who do not allow themselves to be criticized and you will find those who are in power...However they never apply it to themselves...Gordon and the Forum literally cannot mention me or my research because I am so damning to their hypocrisy...Gordon pleads for tolerance yet he railroaded me off the board on false claims of rules violations when I refuted the Prayer Man theory...Gordon lied and said I had failed to live up to the Forum's strict evidence procedure rules...Rules that he couldn't cite and were only applied to me...He was switching the subject in order to keep the correct evidence from being discussed...Gordon knows he is guilty of this which is why he desperately keeps me from being mentioned on the board...That's what Gordon is getting away with calling "tolerance" while the cowardly membership doesn't ask him how exactly that applied to me and my attempt to present the correct Prayer Man evidence that his "tolerant" website still hasn't acknowledged...
Sandy and Gordon have one commonality...They both need to censor me in order to avoid their own malfeasance and violation of their own rules...
Sandy's doing exactly what I knew that evidence delete-er would do and he is knuckling-under to pompous Gordon who is coming in to re-rig the site back in favor of corruption...This process right here is the whole reason why the Deep Politics Forum was originally set up to counter the corrupted moderation of the Education Forum...
Both Sandy and Gordon are rogue hypocrites because if you input my case through their self-serving so-called philosophy you will find that they violate it worse than anybody...That's why they are desperate to keep anyone from doing that on their "tolerant" forum...Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely...
This is a pathetic failure of Peer Review and shows that those with the most power on a website should have, at minimum, equal knowledge and ability as those who post...A website is doomed to perpetual failure if the person in charge is regularly committed to the opposite and avoiding that...
" That said, Sandy has raised an issue. What do we do with a moderator who is not appropriate?
We are going to have to set up procedures for that.
James "
You mean perhaps, Mr phony poseur, like a moderator who steals nearly a year's worth of member's dues?...
Or perhaps like a moderator who bans innocent researchers on false rules violations charges for posting correct evidence?...
Or one who ignores all this and poses himself as a fair-minded site problem solver in order to protect regular favorites who lie about evidence?...
Typical of Gordon, who doesn't know what he is doing either research or moderator-wise, the 'tolerance' he hails to is not what you would think it was...The tolerance that Gordon is talking about is allowing Speer to lie and distort freely and call it tolerance...
Gordon is a liar because he has zero tolerance for intelligent scrutiny of claims...The Education Forum JFK board calls itself a 'debate' board however as soon as you do that intelligently and challenge the false claims of some of the regular false claim makers you get Gordon and his so-called tolerance coming down on you for ill-defined rules violations that he can't cite that he is obviously making up as he goes along in order to protect the main offenders like Speer...Anyone who has a good handle on JFK research will see that Pat Speer is full of it and deliberately bends evidence in a false direction in order to repeatedly attack the main conspiracy evidence...Gordon is shirking his responsibility to control that and blaming the victims as if they were doing something wrong by holding Speer accountable on what is supposed to be debate board...Gordon is a complete incompetent and his moderation is mostly based on feel-good tone-policing and not good facts-based debate...You can see the regular Education Forum weasels go right for the opening in the current state of the forum thread while Gordon encourages their avoidance of the main issue...Once again Gordon is thundering in with holy intimidation as the site owner and switching the topic...He's helping avoid the main issue and is therefore just as guilty as Speer...He's all form, no substance...He is the problem as he hides behind the banning-guarded mask of seeking a solution...What the pathetic little man Gordon is doing is creating pompous wording to relieve himself of being held to the same standard as the members and that is quite British...
The Education Forum members regularly post high philosophy like Voltaire's aphorism that you should look at those who do not allow themselves to be criticized and you will find those who are in power...However they never apply it to themselves...Gordon and the Forum literally cannot mention me or my research because I am so damning to their hypocrisy...Gordon pleads for tolerance yet he railroaded me off the board on false claims of rules violations when I refuted the Prayer Man theory...Gordon lied and said I had failed to live up to the Forum's strict evidence procedure rules...Rules that he couldn't cite and were only applied to me...He was switching the subject in order to keep the correct evidence from being discussed...Gordon knows he is guilty of this which is why he desperately keeps me from being mentioned on the board...That's what Gordon is getting away with calling "tolerance" while the cowardly membership doesn't ask him how exactly that applied to me and my attempt to present the correct Prayer Man evidence that his "tolerant" website still hasn't acknowledged...
Sandy and Gordon have one commonality...They both need to censor me in order to avoid their own malfeasance and violation of their own rules...
Sandy's doing exactly what I knew that evidence delete-er would do and he is knuckling-under to pompous Gordon who is coming in to re-rig the site back in favor of corruption...This process right here is the whole reason why the Deep Politics Forum was originally set up to counter the corrupted moderation of the Education Forum...
Both Sandy and Gordon are rogue hypocrites because if you input my case through their self-serving so-called philosophy you will find that they violate it worse than anybody...That's why they are desperate to keep anyone from doing that on their "tolerant" forum...Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely...
This is a pathetic failure of Peer Review and shows that those with the most power on a website should have, at minimum, equal knowledge and ability as those who post...A website is doomed to perpetual failure if the person in charge is regularly committed to the opposite and avoiding that...
" That said, Sandy has raised an issue. What do we do with a moderator who is not appropriate?
We are going to have to set up procedures for that.
James "
You mean perhaps, Mr phony poseur, like a moderator who steals nearly a year's worth of member's dues?...
Or perhaps like a moderator who bans innocent researchers on false rules violations charges for posting correct evidence?...
Or one who ignores all this and poses himself as a fair-minded site problem solver in order to protect regular favorites who lie about evidence?...