14-06-2024, 05:15 PM
(This post was last modified: 14-06-2024, 05:39 PM by Brian Doyle.)
" As Jim D. said, I also have never heard anyone who is a serious researcher state an "Israel killed KFK" opinion. Not the Mossad, not David Ben Gurion, not anyone connected to Israel. I personally consider anyone who subscribes to an "Israel killed JFK" theory a crackpot, making statements that cannot be supported by facts. "
Knight follows DiEugenio's lead and bases his dismissal of Piper on the strawman of Israel planning the assassination...This dishonestly oversimplified device is then used to avoid discussing Piper's 500 pages of high quality research that exposes strong motivation for Israeli involvement...Knight talks about "the facts" and then avoids every single one of Piper's facts that make a strong case against Israel (Knight probably hasn't even read 'Final Judgment')...This is the advantage of "neutralizing"...You can ban your opponent and then make bogus arguments, and omit information, unopposed...This is the Jim DiEugenio school of research...
Knight fails to realize that his statement above is no different than the commonly-seen statement that no major media outlet ever says Kennedy was killed by US government conspiracy...
The research community continues to offer mediocre nobodies whose only credential is a moderator avatar who have the nerve to pose themselves as dismissing critics of a monster researcher like Piper, whose skills are beyond compare...
DiEugenio said Piper's material was "weak"...The truth is it is so strong that Jim D was literally unable to discuss it directly...Remember, Jim was afraid to debate Piper - not the other way around...Jim is so arrogant that he sees his own cowardly refusal to debate Piper as evidence of Piper's lack of credibility and not the other way around...Jim sees the act of him refusing to debate as refutation while he skips the part where he actually has to discuss Piper's evidence...
You see a good case here how the moderators on the Education Forum work with Jim D to get rid of good evidence...
Knight follows DiEugenio's lead and bases his dismissal of Piper on the strawman of Israel planning the assassination...This dishonestly oversimplified device is then used to avoid discussing Piper's 500 pages of high quality research that exposes strong motivation for Israeli involvement...Knight talks about "the facts" and then avoids every single one of Piper's facts that make a strong case against Israel (Knight probably hasn't even read 'Final Judgment')...This is the advantage of "neutralizing"...You can ban your opponent and then make bogus arguments, and omit information, unopposed...This is the Jim DiEugenio school of research...
Knight fails to realize that his statement above is no different than the commonly-seen statement that no major media outlet ever says Kennedy was killed by US government conspiracy...
The research community continues to offer mediocre nobodies whose only credential is a moderator avatar who have the nerve to pose themselves as dismissing critics of a monster researcher like Piper, whose skills are beyond compare...
DiEugenio said Piper's material was "weak"...The truth is it is so strong that Jim D was literally unable to discuss it directly...Remember, Jim was afraid to debate Piper - not the other way around...Jim is so arrogant that he sees his own cowardly refusal to debate Piper as evidence of Piper's lack of credibility and not the other way around...Jim sees the act of him refusing to debate as refutation while he skips the part where he actually has to discuss Piper's evidence...
You see a good case here how the moderators on the Education Forum work with Jim D to get rid of good evidence...