28-12-2009, 07:36 PM
Jack White Wrote:Myra Bronstein Wrote:Dawn Meredith Wrote:After years of never examining the issue of Z film alteration I am now convinced By Fetzer's video, Doug Horn's blog and Jack's posts.
On Gary Mack- that he'd send an email to McAdams says it all. I now doubt that Mack was EVER on the side of truth.
Dawn
I just have to wonder about that, and so I have to ask.
Jack, sorry to put you on the spot. But I gotta know. When "Gary Mack" (forgot his real name) went over to the dark side and started spewing official lone nut propaganda, was it gradual or sudden? Did it correspond to a significant life event, like getting a job as PR minister of the 6th floor?
WTF?
It was sudden. It coincided with Dave Perry becoming his "best friend" and
his wife divorcing him. It coincided with Readers Digest threatening to sue
him for a million dollars over the Easterling matter and his ceasing to
publish his fine COVERUPS newsletter. Larry Dunkel.
Jack
Reader's Digest threatening to sue over the Easterling matter??? Hmmmm. I had several phone conversations and carried on a correspondance with Henry Hurt when Reasonable Doubt came out ( mid 80s). I told him both on the phone and in writing that the Easterling "confession" was nonsence. He told me it was a call from Easterling that got him interested in the case. I found that odd and suspect thinking "now why would a pretend assassin just call up some guy at Reader's Digest and 'confess'?" I thought the book was very good BUT FOR Easterling and Chapter 11 and all the disinfo there, re RJK, JFK and Castro, which is why I called Hurt to begin with.
So I am curious why they threatened to sue and how it ended.
I used to get Cover-Ups and in fact in 04 when I began posting at Ed forum I asked Gary (PM) if he had been involved in that publication and he disavowed it.
Dawn