13-07-2010, 07:51 AM
Phil Dragoo Wrote:Posner might offer a motive, but would first have to copy and paste it from another writer.:hahaha::hahaha::hahaha:
Bugliosi would likely wait for Horne to comment on the subject, then launch into an apoplectic ad hominem.
What is Dunkel's motive for denying truth?
Or Ruth Paine's for framing Oswald?
Or Dulles' for claiming "that little Kennedy. . .thought he was a god"?
Oswald, obedient to a series of intelligence handlers, caused no actual harm to the 35th president, hence requires no motive.
Arlen Specter will launch into a convoluted explanation soon, interrupted by St. Peter pulling the lever on the trap.
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.