01-01-2011, 06:15 AM
Greg Burnham Wrote:I also agree with Jim Fetzer's analysis, (with the qualifier that "mastermind" is too strong a word for LBJ). However, that qualifier does not diminish the significance of LBJ's role nor does it serve to palliate his perfidy one ounce. Moreover, his role was entirely pivotal in the overall success, not only of the cover-up, but in the assured perpetual impunity of all others who were involved.
Greg,
In the beginning, there was the word.
"Mastermind."
It gives away Nelson's game.
No one with even minimal deep political chops can deny the criminal involvement of LBJ in the public execution of John Fitzgerald Kennedy -- especially the coverup.
No one with even minimal deep political chops can fail to understand that LBJ was, at the pinnacle of his influence, a False Sponsor and Facilitator of the public execution of John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
With each passing day I find myself less able to discern an honest motive for Nelson's egregious ignorance both of deep politics and of the very meaning of the key word in his book's title.
LBJ was wholly owned and controlled by the Sponsors of the assassination. He was designated as a FALSE Sponsor. He was utilized as a Facilitator.
To believe otherwise is to believe that:
A. American presidents (JFK excepted) are anything but figureheads.
B. LBJ, crippled by scandal and on the verge of removal from office and criminal indictment, was in a position to give orders to anyone other than Madeline Brown and his Filippino stewards.
Ask Nelson to provide a model for the assassination conspiracy. I can. I have.
He can't. He won't.
Nelson's book advances the coverup. Whether or not such was Nelson's intent is, in the final analysis, a moot point.