02-01-2011, 11:52 PM
Alan:
Nice reply to Fetzer. And BTW, his analysis of the Ambassador photos was completely unfounded and off the wall. Still, for whatever reason, he tries to revive it WITHOUT EVER DOING ONE IOTA OF ORIGINAL RESEARCH.
Madeleine Brown's story has so many problems to it, that again, I find it hard to believe he takes it seriously. I mean, really, when did LBJ arrive at the Assassination Ball. This incredible, ever evolving, ever growing, ever entangling, social function that never ever seems to end. If you look at Manchester's book, just when did LBj leave the hotel and sneak away?
Howard Hunt's story and Saint John's follow up, further betrays Fetzer's faults--he never went to the primary sources for this whole mess.
And how Nelson's book can carry any weight when os much of it recycles anti JFK trashings.
What Fetzer does not realize is that with long drawn out arguments like this e.g. Judy Baker also, he is a lot of credibility with the younger researchers coming up. In fact, one has even composed a parody letter:
This is Jim Fetzer here. You unintelligent simpletons. Surely you haven't read my books. Obviously you are unworthy. Perhaps you haven't yet mastered the art of critical reasoning, and intelligent thought.
I think the best books are:
-Assassination Science
-Murder in Dealey Plaza
-The Great Zapruder Film Hoax
Best Wishes, Jim Fetzer
Nice reply to Fetzer. And BTW, his analysis of the Ambassador photos was completely unfounded and off the wall. Still, for whatever reason, he tries to revive it WITHOUT EVER DOING ONE IOTA OF ORIGINAL RESEARCH.
Madeleine Brown's story has so many problems to it, that again, I find it hard to believe he takes it seriously. I mean, really, when did LBJ arrive at the Assassination Ball. This incredible, ever evolving, ever growing, ever entangling, social function that never ever seems to end. If you look at Manchester's book, just when did LBj leave the hotel and sneak away?
Howard Hunt's story and Saint John's follow up, further betrays Fetzer's faults--he never went to the primary sources for this whole mess.
And how Nelson's book can carry any weight when os much of it recycles anti JFK trashings.
What Fetzer does not realize is that with long drawn out arguments like this e.g. Judy Baker also, he is a lot of credibility with the younger researchers coming up. In fact, one has even composed a parody letter:
This is Jim Fetzer here. You unintelligent simpletons. Surely you haven't read my books. Obviously you are unworthy. Perhaps you haven't yet mastered the art of critical reasoning, and intelligent thought.
I think the best books are:
-Assassination Science
-Murder in Dealey Plaza
-The Great Zapruder Film Hoax
Best Wishes, Jim Fetzer