Nelson's LBJ Mastermind book

[Charles Drago]

I went to a JFK presentation of Jim Marrs last year (2010). He said he would reveal who murdered John Kennedy. At the end of his presentation, he showed 2 pictures of the JFK killers: Lyndon Johnson and J. Edgar Hoover, both of whom he called "Accessories after the fact" in the murder of John Kennedy.

For the Nerrow-Minded (Nelson + Morrow ... get it?), "Accessories after the fact" [sic] can be twisted like a Cirque du Soleil dancer into "mastermind."

Jim Marrs got it right. Nerrow is being disingenuous in the desperate search for allies.

Jim Marrs is yet ANOTHER person who thinks that LBJ's fave mistress of 21 years, Madeleine Duncan Brown, is a highly credible person. As for me, I don't believe EVERYTHING Madeleine says, but on the big ticket items of LBJ's foreknowledge and his statements on 12/31/63 that it was Texas oil and the CIA who murdered John Kennedy ... I think that is golden.

Nerrow teaches us this much: The colloquial term for Iron pyrite could not be more aptly coined.

Purely subjective, intellectually invalid uses of sources to bolster an indefensible claim. Which is as neat a review of the "Mastermind" abomination as I can muster.

Jim Marrs, I think, would agree to. I have found that the folks who had close contact with Madeleine - people like Ed Tatro, Jim Marrs, James Fetzer, Casey Quindlan, Constance Kritzberg - people who have interviewed or talked with her 30+ times, these folks tend to give her credence.

I do as well, though I never met her. Apparently, she was a sweet lady.

"Sweet lady" -- and Jim Fetzer refers to Morrow as an "expert" in the study of the JFK assassination.

I previously referred to Morrow as Nelson's "idiot son." This literary construction is not uncommon -- an admittedly snarky way to describe a man who evinces not a scintilla of insight, common sense, and original thinking. And, I might add, a man who regularly demonstrates the wisdom inherent in the adage, "Ego is the anesthetic that dulls the pain of ignorance."

In a post above, Morrow has joined Jim Fetzer in asking, rhetorically, if I have special permission to use such language. In the case of Jim, I accept the question as an honest inquiry.

In the case of Morrow, I see it as a sinister ratcheting-up of a larger campaign that is playing out elsewhere.

Time will tell.

I enjoy no special privileges. I use language intended to inform, inquire, and at times provoke toward realizations of greater ends.

Robert Morrow demonstrates the he is Phillip Nelson's unquestioning acolyte. He parrots Morrow's nonsense with the utmost loyalty and not a shard of original thought.

There is an elegantly concise term often used to describe such a person. When the person who is so described interprets it literally, the appropriateness of its use is confirmed.

The term is "idiot son."

Charles