03-01-2011, 06:46 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-01-2011, 09:31 PM by James H. Fetzer.)
While most of Phil Dragoo's outline is correct, no one who understood the character and personality of Lyndon Baines Johnson would ever mistake him for anyone's "lacky". Robert Morrow is a brilliant and aggressive student of this case, who came to his conclusions independently of Phil Nelson. In my opinion, Charles' performance here is simply appalling and cannot possibly conform to the policies of this forum.
I find it offensive that the "master of ceremonies" continues to used derogatory language in discussing him, addressing him as "Nerrow minded"! How childish can we get? Dawn got on me for a very dispassionate and brief mention of a demonstration of deference to Jefferson Morley, where I was offering the mildest reprimand. Anyone who reviews this thread will find that Charles has been abusive from the beginning.
I cannot believe that anyone who has actually read the book would make some of the claims that have been made here. I asked him simple questions about when he obtained the book and when he read it but which, so far as I have been able to discern, he has side-stepped with endless ravings about the meaning of the word "mastermind", as though that issue had not already been thoroughly discussed. This is very bad.
And he continues to use the phrase, "idiot son"! I most certainly have not been reassured as yet by any of his responses since I first raised the question. He feigns that he does not care. It is not a question of friendship. I hope that he has read it and that we continue to remain friends. But I cannot place friendship ahead of truth. If we place friendship ahead of truth, then there is only friendship and no truth.
I find it offensive that the "master of ceremonies" continues to used derogatory language in discussing him, addressing him as "Nerrow minded"! How childish can we get? Dawn got on me for a very dispassionate and brief mention of a demonstration of deference to Jefferson Morley, where I was offering the mildest reprimand. Anyone who reviews this thread will find that Charles has been abusive from the beginning.
I cannot believe that anyone who has actually read the book would make some of the claims that have been made here. I asked him simple questions about when he obtained the book and when he read it but which, so far as I have been able to discern, he has side-stepped with endless ravings about the meaning of the word "mastermind", as though that issue had not already been thoroughly discussed. This is very bad.
And he continues to use the phrase, "idiot son"! I most certainly have not been reassured as yet by any of his responses since I first raised the question. He feigns that he does not care. It is not a question of friendship. I hope that he has read it and that we continue to remain friends. But I cannot place friendship ahead of truth. If we place friendship ahead of truth, then there is only friendship and no truth.
Charles Drago Wrote:Perfectly reasoned, Phil.
The Morrow "filibuster," as you put it, further identifies the Nelson/Morrow clique with the tactics of those who confuse repetition with rationality. Not to mention with those who serve a very dark agenda.
The last time this happened on DPF was when an apparently emotionally disturbed fellow named, if memory serves, Hanson made post after bandwidth-consuming post attempting to "prove" the long-dismissed "theory" that JFK was shot from inside his limousine.
Hanson later went on to forge my reply in which I demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt that he was lying, twisting its meaning 180 degrees and posting it on his site and others over my signature.
Morrow is just another Hanson. They can't help opening their kimonos.
Charles
Charles