Nelson's LBJ Mastermind book

[James H. Fetzer]

You misread the sentence. I was saying that, for you to argue there is no
evidence that LBJ was handling Oswald in New Orleans (which OBVIOUSLY
PRESUPPOSES THAT HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN) has to establish a new level
of absurdity, . . .". It is the presupposition that is absurd. I HAVE NEVER
ARGUED THAT LYNDON WAS HANDLING OSWALD ANYWHERE, ANYTIME.

I am now convinced that the suggestion you are just not that bright is true.
If you are this far out of your depth about a matter as trivial as this (what
I was asserting in a post on this thread), then it is no wonder that Judyth,
the CIA at the Ambassador, and the role of LBJ is far beyond you. There is
an old expression that seems to fit this situation to a "t": DUMB AS A POST!

JIm Fetzer:

"For him to argue at this stage of the debate that there is no evidence that LBJ was handling
Oswald in New Orleans has to establish a new level of absurdity, ..."

Jim Fetzer, a few posts later:

"I HAVE NEVER SUGGESTED THAT LBJ WAS CONTROLLING OSWALD ANYWHERE."

Well Jim, which is it? Is there or isn't there?

And by the way, how do you know when CD receives books he ends up reading but does not like? I mean there is more than one person who had that reaction to Nelson. Martin Hay got two chapters into the book and tossed it.

And you never answered my questions did you?

What did LBJ have to do with the murder of Officer Tippit?

Did Mac Wallace kill Kennedy? If he did,who were the other assassins?

How did LBJ get RUby to kill Oswald?

You say Nelson's book is so fine, then go ahead and explain how LBJ masterminded those three events.

Because if he did not, then what is left is the cover up. And as DOn GIbson proved, the Warren COmmission was not even Johnson's idea.