07-01-2011, 01:45 AM
Christine Keeler? Now we are really getting out there into Thomas Reeves territory. Except that one is not even in Reeves' pile of excrement.
Bob, now you are getting better. Its not that Nelson R wanted atomic weapons in Nam. Its who he was, where he was in the power structure, and who he had ties to.
But let me return to an earlier point. Morrow apparently likes the Nelson book which calls LBJ the ringleader--mastermind--of the plot.
But yet in Dallas, and elsewhere, he also seems to go for the Hankey/Baker School of Bush. Which is it?
Is there any proof the two knew each other before 1963? Let alone were in on the conspiracy?
ANd this was my point at the end of my talk. See, not everyone killed Kennedy. That is Torbitt Document disinfo. But yet, if you buy into every book ever written, that is what happened. There is even Gilbride and his Byrd/Truly TSBD conspiracy of blacks. whites, Hispanics and racists, all uniting to kill JFK? For what? Go figure. But that is what happens in a research community with no quality control.
If we buy into that, then really no one killed Kennedy. Or its back to the WC. WHy? Because the MSM will use all the confusion to paint us as a bunch of disorganized goof balls who cannot agree on anything. And the public will then shrug its shoulders and say, "Well, I don't really buy Oswald. But these guys are like a flavor of the month club."
That is why we have to have some kind of tradition to apply to new work. And we do. We have a long and rich one. And new works have to be compared and evaluated against that tradition. ANd we should not be shy about applying that past to new work. There have been some very good people who have plowed these fields. We tend to forget that because we are constantly being marginalized by the MSM and shunted aside while Perry and Mack get on Discovery Channel. But with the rise of the web, we are showing they have to pay a price now. ANd we extracted it from them at ctka.net.
But my point is, if you have not read that tradition and are not versed in it, then you cannot apply any standards.
Bob, now you are getting better. Its not that Nelson R wanted atomic weapons in Nam. Its who he was, where he was in the power structure, and who he had ties to.
But let me return to an earlier point. Morrow apparently likes the Nelson book which calls LBJ the ringleader--mastermind--of the plot.
But yet in Dallas, and elsewhere, he also seems to go for the Hankey/Baker School of Bush. Which is it?
Is there any proof the two knew each other before 1963? Let alone were in on the conspiracy?
ANd this was my point at the end of my talk. See, not everyone killed Kennedy. That is Torbitt Document disinfo. But yet, if you buy into every book ever written, that is what happened. There is even Gilbride and his Byrd/Truly TSBD conspiracy of blacks. whites, Hispanics and racists, all uniting to kill JFK? For what? Go figure. But that is what happens in a research community with no quality control.
If we buy into that, then really no one killed Kennedy. Or its back to the WC. WHy? Because the MSM will use all the confusion to paint us as a bunch of disorganized goof balls who cannot agree on anything. And the public will then shrug its shoulders and say, "Well, I don't really buy Oswald. But these guys are like a flavor of the month club."
That is why we have to have some kind of tradition to apply to new work. And we do. We have a long and rich one. And new works have to be compared and evaluated against that tradition. ANd we should not be shy about applying that past to new work. There have been some very good people who have plowed these fields. We tend to forget that because we are constantly being marginalized by the MSM and shunted aside while Perry and Mack get on Discovery Channel. But with the rise of the web, we are showing they have to pay a price now. ANd we extracted it from them at ctka.net.
But my point is, if you have not read that tradition and are not versed in it, then you cannot apply any standards.