15-01-2011, 02:45 PM
In my most recent post above I added the following material:
Your understanding of disinformation seems rather superficial, if I may say. "Disinformation" and "lies" are not synonymous. The spreading of false information is but one component of a disinformation operation -- the key element of which is the selective presentation of verifiable fact. Nelson tells us nothing we did not already know. A great deal of what he professes to be true is true. Like all disinformationalists he uses such statements of fact to establish his bona fides, and then goes on to present, for example, the Hersh abominations as fact with the expectation that his readers will accept these arguments from authority.
Previously on this thread I have demonstrated how Nelson has attempted to back away from his now crumbling "mastermind" deception even though in his book he steadfastly maintains, in no uncertain terms, that LBJ did indeed supply the directing or creative intelligence for the assassination conspiracy. You tell me the proper word to describe Nelson's action.
To it I would add this: If in fact LBJ embodied the directing or creative intelligence for the JFK assassination conspiracy, then surely it follows that he would have played the same role in the MLK and RFK plots. Or will you argue that LBJ's genius was so staggering that others used his perfect plan as a template upon which to base subsequent deep political murders?
Also, remember that, as I've documented elsewhere in this too-long thread, Nelson claims that LBJ was hands-on throughout the plot, pre- and post-shooting. He allegedly was handling "hundreds or thousands" of coverup details. Keep this in mind if you choose to argue that LBJ simply gave the orders and let others devise the particulars.
Finally, I'd like you to tell me what kind of "mastermind" stages a presidential assassination in his home state and sends his publicly acknowledged closest advisors to oversee details?
Your understanding of disinformation seems rather superficial, if I may say. "Disinformation" and "lies" are not synonymous. The spreading of false information is but one component of a disinformation operation -- the key element of which is the selective presentation of verifiable fact. Nelson tells us nothing we did not already know. A great deal of what he professes to be true is true. Like all disinformationalists he uses such statements of fact to establish his bona fides, and then goes on to present, for example, the Hersh abominations as fact with the expectation that his readers will accept these arguments from authority.
Previously on this thread I have demonstrated how Nelson has attempted to back away from his now crumbling "mastermind" deception even though in his book he steadfastly maintains, in no uncertain terms, that LBJ did indeed supply the directing or creative intelligence for the assassination conspiracy. You tell me the proper word to describe Nelson's action.
To it I would add this: If in fact LBJ embodied the directing or creative intelligence for the JFK assassination conspiracy, then surely it follows that he would have played the same role in the MLK and RFK plots. Or will you argue that LBJ's genius was so staggering that others used his perfect plan as a template upon which to base subsequent deep political murders?
Also, remember that, as I've documented elsewhere in this too-long thread, Nelson claims that LBJ was hands-on throughout the plot, pre- and post-shooting. He allegedly was handling "hundreds or thousands" of coverup details. Keep this in mind if you choose to argue that LBJ simply gave the orders and let others devise the particulars.
Finally, I'd like you to tell me what kind of "mastermind" stages a presidential assassination in his home state and sends his publicly acknowledged closest advisors to oversee details?
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene

