Nelson's LBJ Mastermind book

[James H. Fetzer]

Why am I not surprised? Anyone can enter "Morgan Reynolds, JFK" on google and come up with multiple articles and interviews he has done about JFK, some of which I consider to be quite brilliant. I don't understand why this guy appears to be too lazy to do the least research about something as simple and straightforward as this.

PLUS what would it matter if this were his first outing on JFK? That DiEugenio is even raising the question is not only a form of self-promotion but an obvious ad hominem attack. If he disagrees with Morgan's position, let him offer evidence and arguments to defeat it. If Jim pays attention, he is going to learn from him about JFK and 9/11.

The Assassination of JFK, 9/11 And David Rockefeller
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=91...ockefeller

Talking with Jim Marrs about JFK and 9/11 Parallels
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=91...rs_JFK_911

Death in Dallas
http://www.assassinationscience.com/DeathInDallas.pdf

Can I ask a question and hope not to be presumptuous?

If this is the Morgan Reynolds from the 9-11 field, you know, no planes hit the WTC and all that, what is his background in the JFK case?

I mean most of us have been studying this case for many, many years and have written books, articles, essays etc. So when we say that it is highly unlikely that LBJ was the mastermind of the plot, we know of what we speak. And we can back it up with more than generalities. And CD and I have done so. We have also shown that Nelson used some highly questionable sources in his book e g. Mr. CIA asset, Sy Hersh and the unreliable Barr McClellan. He also made some assertions for which he had no evidence i.e. that LBJ was somehow in on a body alteration plot. This had to be specualtive since Lifton's theory, as expressed in Best Evidence, the hijacking of the body off of AF One is speculative.

I have never read an article or essay on this case from Mr. Reynolds. Can he point me to where he has ever done such work?